Impact of Two Course Content Delivery Systems on Student Learning

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren H Jarboe ◽  
D Raj Raman
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren H Jarboe ◽  
D Raj Raman ◽  
Katrina L Christiansen

Author(s):  
Salvatore Valenti ◽  
Alessandro Cucciarelli ◽  
Maurizio Panti

The number of educational institutions seeking solutions to the problems associated with the burden of expanded student numbers is increasing every day. Most solutions to the problems of delivering course content, supporting student learning, and assessment may be found through the use of computers, thanks to the continuous advances of information technology. According to Bull (1999), using computers to perform assessment is more contentious than using them both to deliver content and to support student learning. In many papers, the terms Computer Assisted Assessment (CAA) and Computer Based Assessment (CBA) are often used interchangeably and somewhat inconsistently. The former usually covers all use of computers in assessment, including reporting and marking, such as in optical mark reading. The latter is often restricted to the use of computers for the entire process, including delivery of the assessment and provision of feedback (Charman and Elmes, 1998). In this paper we will adopt the term Computer Based Assessment and we will discuss some issues related to the online assessment of students.


Author(s):  
Salvatore Valenti

Most solutions to the problem of delivering course content supporting both student learning and assessment nowadays imply the use of computers, thanks to the continuous advances of information technology. According to Bull (1999), using computers to perform assessment is more contentious than using them to deliver content and to support student learning. In many papers, the terms computer-assisted assessment (CAA) and computer-based assessment (CBA) are often used interchangeably and somewhat inconsistently. The former refers to the use of computers in assessment. The term encompasses the uses of computers to deliver, mark, and analyze assignments or examinations. It also includes the collation and analysis of data gathered from optical mark readers. The latter (that will be used in this paper) addresses the use of computers for the entire process, including assessment delivery and feedback provision (Charman & Elmes, 1998).


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1160-1173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Kone ◽  
Haitao Zheng ◽  
Antony Rowstron ◽  
Greg O'Shea ◽  
Ben Y. Zhao

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
Wilhelm Peekhaus

This paper suggests that the latest digital mechanisms for delivering higher education course content are yet another step in subordinating academic labor. The two main digital delivery mechanisms discussed in the paper are MOOCs and flexible option degrees. The paper advances the argument that, despite a relatively privileged position vis-à-vis other workers, academic cognitive laborers are caught up within and subject to some of the constraining and exploitative practices of capitalist accumulation processes. This capture within capitalist circuits of accumulation threatens to increase in velocity and scale through digital delivery mechanisms such as MOOCs and flexible option programs/degrees.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 984-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuebin Zhang ◽  
Danni Xiong ◽  
Kai Zhao ◽  
Chang Wen Chen ◽  
Tong Zhang

Author(s):  
Mathew J. Bergman ◽  
Kevin J. Rose ◽  
Meera Alagaraja

In this chapter, the authors share specific ways in which the Organizational Leadership and Learning Program provides excellence in access, cost effectiveness, learning effectiveness, and faculty and student satisfaction. The program is designed to meet the needs of adult learners with some college but no degree and incorporates the use of asynchronous content delivery and faculty-student interaction. The exposure to course content via an online platform, interaction with students and faculty online, and the development of a learning community at a distance equips students not only with content knowledge, but also with technical prowess that is necessary in a technology-based workplace. Despite the relative ease of access and clear benefits of higher education, challenges still exist with educating an adult population. Therefore, it is essential that more adult friendly practices become integrated into the fabric of traditional four-year colleges and universities.


2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 937-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Guo ◽  
Sean Marston ◽  
Yuwen Chen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document