Thermal-Infrared Surveys for Uranium Exploration in South Texas: ABSTRACT

AAPG Bulletin ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry W. Offield, Timothy E. Townse
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 293-295
Author(s):  
I. Vauglin ◽  
N. Gavrilović ◽  
P. Prugniel

2008 ◽  
Vol 177 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Letizia Spampinato ◽  
Sonia Calvari ◽  
Clive Oppenheimer ◽  
Luigi Lodato

1982 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Crawley

By the 1950s most of the uranium districts of the U.S.A. had been discovered as a result of incentives from the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, and 94% of resources proved to be sandstone deposits. Principal resource regions are the Colorado Plateau, producing about 65% of the U.S. total, Wyoming basins (24%) and the South Texas coastal plain (only 5%). The two major types of deposit found in these regions are ‘roll-type’ and ‘peneconcordant’, the former precipitated at geochemical fronts where oxidizing uranium-bearing groundwater penetrated reduced sandstones. The latter occur where uranium in solution has been precipitated locally by agents such as carbonaceous materials, humates or pyrite. Colorado Plateau production is mainly from peneconcordant deposits, the majority from the Grants uranium region (New Mexico) Uravan mineral belt (Colorado) and Lisbon Valley (Utah). These are commonly underground mines, although the largest uranium open pit in the U.S.A. is found in the Grants region. Roll-type deposits of Wyoming, where the Powder River Basin was the most active area of exploitation in the 1970s, are generally mined open pit, though some are underground and have been tested for in-situ leach mining. Both open pit and leach mining are common in Texas. Over 80% of uranium exploration in the U.S.A. since 1974 has been in sandstone deposits, and projections predict that domestic demand to 2000 will be satisfied from U.S. proven reserves and probable potential resources. To meet these requirements, however, most production will be from resources in forward cost categories of more than U.S.$30 per pound U3O8. At present U.S. exploration and production have been curtailed, because of over supply, a trend that will continue for some years. Although demand is expected to grow after 1986, foreign low-cost non-sandstone uranium will compete with U.S. reserves, which may already have been adversely affected by mine closures, ‘high grading’ and decreased exploration and development.


Author(s):  
Patrick Schukalla

Uranium mining often escapes the attention of debates around the nuclear industries. The chemical elements’ representations are focused on the nuclear reactor. The article explores what I refer to as becoming the nuclear front – the uranium mining frontier’s expansion to Tanzania, its historical entanglements and current state. The geographies of the nuclear industries parallel dominant patterns and the unevenness of the global divisions of labour, resource production and consumption. Clearly related to the developments and expectations in the field of atomic power production, uranium exploration and the gathering of geological knowledge on resource potentiality remains a peripheral realm of the technopolitical perceptions of the nuclear fuel chain. Seen as less spectacular and less associated with high-technology than the better-known elements of the nuclear industry the article thus aims to shine light on the processes that pre-figure uranium mining by looking at the example of Tanzania.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document