scholarly journals Distal Revascularisation with Interval Ligation (DRIL): An Experience

2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (5) ◽  
pp. 394-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Field ◽  
J Blackwell ◽  
A Jaipersad ◽  
M Wall ◽  
MA Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Rest Pain ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Central Lines ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Digital Pulse ◽  
Global Increase ◽  
Steal Syndrome

INTRODUCTION The global increase of chronic renal failure has resulted in a growing number of patients on haemodialysis using arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). By virtue of their very function, AVFs at times shunt blood away from regions distally, resulting in an ischaemic steal syndrome. Distal revascularisation with interval ligation (DRIL) has been described as a procedure to treat symptomatic ischaemic steal. We present our experience in the management of this complication. PATIENTS AND METHODS Six patients with severe ischaemic steal were treated using a DRIL procedure between May 2004 and June 2007. There were three males and three females, all with elbow brachiocephalic AVFs. Symptoms ranged from severe rest pain to digital gangrene. Published results from international studies of 135 DRIL procedures were also reviewed. RESULTS Vascular access was maintained along with the elimination of ischaemic symptoms in the six patients using an ipsilateral reversed basilic vein graft. Interval ligation of the distal brachial artery was performed at the same time. All patients showed immediate and sustained clinical improvement of symptoms with a demonstrable increase in digital pulse oximetry. CONCLUSIONS DRIL is a beneficial treatment option that has proven successful at alleviating ischemic steal symptoms and preserving vascular access. This avoids placement of central lines, its associated risks, and the need to create an alternative sited fistula.

Superficialization of Basilic Vein: Last Chance for a Native Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Onaran ◽  
D. Erer ◽  
I. Şen ◽  
E.E. Elnur ◽  
E. Iriz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Brachial Artery ◽  
Subcutaneous Tissue ◽  
Vascular Grafts ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Chronic Hemodialysis ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Number Of Patients

Background Although the best type of vascular access for chronic hemodialysis patients is a native arteriovenous fistula, in an increasing number of patients all the superficial veins have been used and only the placement of vascular grafts or permanent catheters is left. Superficialization of the basilic vein is a possible alternative. Materials and Methods In 49 chronic hemodialysis patients who had no possibilities to have a native arteriovenous fistula created, we performed a basilic vein- brachial artery fistula in the arm. During the same operation the basilic vein was then superficialized for easier access for hemodialysis. Results Mean follow-up was 22.36±15.56 months. Forty-eight patients are still undergoing hemodialysis with their superficialized basilic vein native A-V fistula without any complications. Only one fistula was thrombosed just after the procedure because of poor vessel quality. Conclusion For hemodialysis patients who have no suitable superficial veins at the wrist or elbow, performing a basilic vein - brachial artery fistula and superficializing the vein to the subcutaneous tissue is an acceptable choice before deciding to use more complicated procedures like vascular grafts.

Arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis: Brief review and current problems

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110077
Author(s):  
John J Manov ◽  
Prasoon P Mohan ◽  
Roberto Vazquez-Padron
Keyword(s):  
Renal Disease ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

The number of people worldwide living with end-stage renal disease is increasing. Arteriovenous fistulas are the preferred method of vascular access in patients who will require hemodialysis. As the number of patients with arteriovenous fistulas grows, the role of physicians who intervene who maintain and salvage these fistulas will grow in importance. This review aims to familiarize practitioners with the rationale for arteriovenous fistula creation, the detection of fistula dysfunction, and the state of the art on fistula maintenance and preservation. Current controversies are briefly reviewed.

Superficialization of Basilic Vein: Last Chance for a Native Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
M. Onaran ◽  
D. Erer ◽  
I. Şen ◽  
E.E. Elnur ◽  
E. Iriz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Brachial Artery ◽  
Subcutaneous Tissue ◽  
Vascular Grafts ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Chronic Hemodialysis ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Number Of Patients

Background Although the best type of vascular access for chronic hemodialysis patients is a native arteriovenous fistula, in an increasing number of patients all the superficial veins have been used and only the placement of vascular grafts or permanent catheters is left. Superficialization of the basilic vein is a possible alternative. Materials and Methods In 49 chronic hemodialysis patients who had no possibilities to have a native arteriovenous fistula created, we performed a basilic vein- brachial artery fistula in the arm. During the same operation the basilic vein was then superficialized for easier access for hemodialysis. Results Mean follow-up was 22.36±15.56 months. Forty-eight patients are still undergoing hemodialysis with their superficialized basilic vein native A-V fistula without any complications. Only one fistula was thrombosed just after the procedure because of poor vessel quality. Conclusion For hemodialysis patients who have no suitable superficial veins at the wrist or elbow, performing a basilic vein - brachial artery fistula and superficializing the vein to the subcutaneous tissue is an acceptable choice before deciding to use more complicated procedures like vascular grafts.

scholarly journals Current status of vascular access in Japan—from Dialysis Access Symposium 2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 38-44
Author(s):  
Mizuya Fukasawa
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Good Survival ◽  
Chronic Glomerulonephritis ◽  
Dialysis Access ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Survival Prognosis ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Wide Range

At the second Dialysis Access Symposium held in Nagoya, Japan, a proposal was made to investigate the differences in vascular access methods used in different countries. In this article, we describe the management of vascular access in Japan. The Japanese population is rapidly aging, and the proportion of elderly patients on dialysis is also increasing. There were 325,000 dialysis patients in Japan at the end of 2015, of whom 65.1% were aged 65 years or above. The number of patients with diabetic nephropathy or nephrosclerosis as the underlying condition is also increasing, whereas the number with chronic glomerulonephritis is steadily decreasing. The Japanese health insurance system enables patients to undergo medical treatment at almost no out-of-pocket cost. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty suffers from a severe device lag compared with other countries, but although there are limitations on permitted devices, the use of those that have been authorized is covered by medical insurance. One important point that is unique to Japan is that vascular access is performed and managed by doctors involved in dialysis across a wide range of disciplines, including nephrologists, surgeons, and urologists. This may be one factor contributing to the good survival prognosis of Japanese dialysis patients.

scholarly journals P1296CARDIAC COMPLICATIONS OF ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULAS IN PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nessrine Breik ◽  
Hela Jbeli ◽  
Safa Fattoum ◽  
Imen Ouertani ◽  
Badreddine Ben kaab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
Interventricular Septum ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Chronic Hemodialysis ◽  
Cardiac Complications ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Cardiac Status

Abstract Background and Aims Current literature suggests the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) to be the preferred type of vascular access for hemodialysis. However, AVFs have significant and potentially deleterious effects on cardiac functions particularly in the setting of preexisting heart disease. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and echocardiographic evolution after creation of a proximal AVF and a radial AVF. Method We conducted a retrospective descriptive study including all chronic hemodialysis patients through AVF. Group 1 (G1) included patients with proximal AVF and group 2 (G2) patients with radial AVF. Results Twenty-four patients were collected in G1 and the average age was 55 years. G2 included 13 patients with a mean age of 44 years. Systolic blood pressure decreased after AVF creation in both groups (G1: 62.5%, G2: 45%, NS). A dyspnea was noted in 70% of cases of G1 and 38.4% of cases of G2 (NS). The interventricular septum was thickened in 20.8% of cases of G1 and 38.4% of G2 (NS). Left ventricular (LV) dilatation was observed in both groups with LV diastolic telegram diameter increase of 58% in G1 versus 10% in G2 (p = 0.04). A decrease in LV ejection fraction was found in 62.5% in G1 and 46.1% in G2 (p = 0.066). The major cardiac complications in G1 were acute coronary syndrome in 5 patients and atrial fibrillation in 4 cases after an average of 60 months and 35 months, respectively. No cardiac complications were noted in G2. Conclusion AVFs remain the preferred type of vascular access for chronic hemodialysis therapy because they are associated with better long-term patency and fewer complications compared with synthetic grafts. Its seat will depend on the vascular state and the cardiac status of the dialysis patient.

scholarly journals Comparative effectiveness of one-stage versus two-stage basilic vein transposition arteriovenous fistulas

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 529-535.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir A. Ghaffarian ◽  
Claire L. Griffin ◽  
Larry W. Kraiss ◽  
Mark R. Sarfati ◽  
Benjamin S. Brooke
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Stage Versus ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
One Stage

The value of ultrasound in the multivariate assessment complications of permanent vascular access for hemodialysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-67
Author(s):  
T. V. Zakhmatova ◽  
V. S. Koen ◽  
R. E. Shtentsel
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Main Tool ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Maximum Duration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Dynamic Ultrasound ◽  
Access Complications ◽  
Design And Methods ◽  
Steal Syndrome

Background. The maximum duration of vascular access for hemodialysis functioning rarely exceeds 4 years. The main tool for diagnosing access dysfunction is duplex ultrasound. Dynamic ultrasound examination of vascular access is not included in the standard examination of patient undergoing hemodialysis in Russia.Objective. To study the structure of complications and changes in hemodynamics in the vascular access for hemodialysis and to determine the risk factors contributing to its development.Design and methods. Ultrasound, clinical and laboratory examination was performed in 550 patients undergoing program hemodialysis, 517 (94.0 %) of them had arteriovenous fistula, 33 (6.0 %) patients had arteriovenous graft.Results. Vascular access complications occurred in 26.7 % (147 patients), there was no significant difference in the detection rate of thrombosis (26.5 %), stenosis (23.8 %), and aneurysm (21.1 %). A combination of two complications was observed in 20.4 %, the steal syndrome — in 8.2 %. A correlation was established between the presence of significant stenosis, aneurysm of the outflow vein and the development of thrombosis, between the presence of concomitant diseases of the peripheral arteries and the development of steal syndrome and stenosis of the inflow artery and the anastomosis zone.Conclusion. Duplex ultrasound allows to diagnose complications of vascular access for hemodialysis and determine its causes.

scholarly journals Gender Disparities in Vascular Access Surgical Outcomes in Elderly Hemodialysis Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timmy Lee ◽  
Joyce Qian ◽  
Mae Thamer ◽  
Michael Allon
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Relative Rate ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Elderly Male ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas

Background: Despite national vascular access guidelines promoting the use of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) over arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) for dialysis, AVF use is substantially lower in females. We assessed clinically relevant AVF and AVG surgical outcomes in elderly male and female patients initiating hemodialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC). Methods: Using the United States Renal Data System standard analytic files linked with Medicare claims, we assessed incident hemodialysis patients in the United States, 9,458 elderly patients (≥67 years; 4,927 males and 4,531 females) initiating hemodialysis from July 2010 to June 2011 with a catheter and had an AVF or AVG placed within 6 months. We evaluated vascular access placement, successful use for dialysis, assisted use (requiring an intervention before successful use), abandonment after successful use, and rate of interventions after successful use. Results: Females were less likely than males to receive an AVF (adjusted likelihood 0.57, 95% CI 0.52–0.63). Among patients receiving an AVF, females had higher adjusted likelihoods of unsuccessful AVF use (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46, 95% CI 1.36–1.56), assisted AVF use (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17–1.54), and AVF abandonment (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10–1.50), but similar relative rate of AVF interventions after successful use (relative risk [RR] 1.01, 95% CI 0.94–1.08). Among patients receiving an AVG, females had a lower likelihood of unsuccessful AVG use (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73–0.94), similar rates of assisted AVG use (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.78–1.40) and AVG abandonment, and greater relative rate of interventions after successful AVG use (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01–1.33). Conclusions: While AVFs should be considered the preferred vascular access in most circumstances, clinical AVF surgical outcomes are uniformly worse in females. Clinicians should also consider AVGs as a viable alternative in elderly female patients initiating hemodialysis with a CVC to avoid extended CVC dependence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document