Doing the Right Thing: Consequences for Health Care Team Members

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 92-95
Author(s):  
Camille Renella
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 946-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Arnett ◽  
Rebecca L. Sudore ◽  
David Nowels ◽  
Cindy X. Feng ◽  
Cari R. Levy ◽  
...  

Background: Interprofessional health care team members consider advance care planning (ACP) to be important, yet gaps remain in systematic clinical routines to support ACP. A clearer understanding of the interprofessional team members’ perspectives on ACP clinical routines in diverse settings is needed. Methods: One hundred eighteen health care team members from community-based clinics, long-term care facilities, academic clinics, federally qualified health centers, and hospitals participated in a 35-question, cross-sectional online survey to assess clinical routines, workflow processes, and policies relating to ACP. Results: Respondents were 53% physicians, 18% advanced practice nurses, 11% nurses, and 18% other interprofessional team members including administrators, chaplains, social workers, and others. Regarding clinical routines, respondents reported that several interprofessional team members play a role in facilitating ACP (ie, physician, social worker, nurse, others). Most (62%) settings did not have, or did not know of, policies related to ACP documentation. Only 14% of settings had a patient education program. Two-thirds of the respondents said that addressing ACP is a high priority and 85% felt that nonphysicians could have ACP conversations with appropriate training. The clinical resources needed to improve clinical routines included training for providers and staff, dedicated staff to facilitate ACP, and availability of patient/family educational materials. Conclusion: Although interprofessional health care team members consider ACP a priority and several team members may be involved, clinical settings lack systematic clinical routines to support ACP. Patient educational materials, interprofessional team training, and policies to support ACP clinical workflows that do not rely solely on physicians could improve ACP across diverse clinical settings.


1986 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-389
Author(s):  
Sebastian Rodriguez

About 20 years ago, when diabetes education and the development of the health care team were not quite bom, Dr Rodri guez had the dream and the enthusiasm to help the physicians and health team members of Latin America. With unswerv ing determination, end less patience, and good humor, he welded to gether the courses des cribed in this essay. He probably knows more physicians in South and Central America than any one else. His contribution is most timely. —EDS.


2018 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. 985-986
Author(s):  
Jo Shapiro

Evidence clearly indicates that physicians are suffering. This is harming our profession, our colleagues, other health care team members, and sometimes our patients. There are efforts nationally and internationally to explore ways of promoting wellness and decreasing the high levels of burnout among physicians. While promoting wellness is a complex challenge, and the solutions will need to be multifactorial, the literature suggests that the most effective interventions are organizational. Instead of putting the burden solely on us as individuals to be able to cope with challenging environments, we should be working toward improving the culture and processes in the workplace. Some technical solutions will be needed, but the challenges will also require adaptive solutions that address issues of trust and support. Our Center for Professionalism and Peer Support offers organizational initiatives designed to foster a culture of trust and respect through professionalism, conflict management, peer support, and disclosure coaching programs.


Maturitas ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. S129
Author(s):  
F. Mostafazadeh ◽  
M. Mashoufi ◽  
M. Rostamnejad ◽  
M. Karimollahi

2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 784-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Harold Van Houtven ◽  
Katherine E. M. Miller ◽  
Emily C. O’Brien ◽  
Jennifer L. Wolff ◽  
Jennifer Lindquist ◽  
...  

Despite the important role that family caregivers play managing the care of persons with complex health needs, little is known about how caregivers perceive themselves to be recognized and valued by health care professionals. Our objective was to develop and validate a novel measure, the CAregiver Perceptions About Commun Ication with Clinical Team members (CAPACITY) instrument. Questions focus on perceived quality of communication with the health care team and the extent to which caregivers believe that the health care team considers their capacity and preferences in decision making. A confirmatory factor analysis supported a two-factor solution addressing communication and capacity. Internal consistency reliability was .90 for the communication domain and .93 for the capacity domain. Correlations between these two subscales and individual difference measures provided evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. The CAPACITY instrument may be a useful performance measure that quantifies the extent to which caregivers’ experience person- and family-centered health care.


Author(s):  
Kevin Real ◽  
Andy Pilny

Effective communication in health care teams is central to the delivery of high-quality, safe, dependable, and efficient patient care. Understanding how health care team communication operates within healthcare systems is important. Viewing health care teams in hospital settings as creators and channels for diffusions of health and risk messages is an important contribution to health communication scholarship. Health care teams are essential elements of healthcare systems. In many instances, they are components of multiteam systems embedded within larger network ecosystems. These teams are not identical, thus, considering how team type (e.g., unidisciplinary, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary) shapes distinct communication processes offers a better understanding of how these teams facilitate health and risk message diffusion. TeamSTEPPS is an important framework for essential teamwork behaviors that facilitate team processes in healthcare systems. Significantly, we develop specific communication competencies drawn from observation work that facilitate health care team effectiveness. Ideas developed by Kurt Lewin are utilized to consider how different types of multiteam systems can be effective as channels and facilitators of health and risk messages. We end the chapter with examples from field research. A set of hospital nursing unidisciplinary teams comprise a network of teams that form a heterarchical structure with important messages flowing between teams. An innovative form of hospital interdisciplinary rounds relies on specific communication practices to create and exchange health and risk messages to patients, families, health care team members, and other healthcare stakeholders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document