Vasculitis after Flu Shot; Pulmonary Toxicity Associated with Amiodarone may be Difficult to Assess; Capecitabine-Induced Severe Hypertriglyceridemia; Infliximab-Induced Lupus Erythematosus Tumidus; Ifosfamide-Induced Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus; Seizure Activity Due to an Antiseizure Drug - Especially When Used Off-Label; Two Interesting Reviews concerning Adverse Events

2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-320
Author(s):  
Joel Shuster
2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-25
Author(s):  
Rocco Galimi

In the elderly, new onset of epilepsy is often associated with vague complaints such as confusion, altered mental status, or memory problems. The absence of clinically apparent convulsions in association with an electroencephalogram showing continuous or recurrent seizure activity has been called nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). The purpose of this article is to describe the clinical and electroencephalographic features of NCSE in older adults. NCSE is an important, under-recognised and reversible cause of acute prolonged confusion. Although attempts have been made to define and classify this disorder, there is no universally accepted definition or classification yet that encompasses all subtypes or electroclinical scenarios. A urgent electroencephalogram is considered as the method of choice in the diagnostic evaluation of NCSE. Further researches are needed to better define NCSE.


Author(s):  
Christopher P. Robinson ◽  
Sara E. Hocker

Status epilepticus (SE) is a medical and neurologic emergency defined as persistent seizure activity lasting longer than 5 minutes or recurrent seizure activity without return to baseline between events. Several classifications exist. The Neurocritical Care Society recommends a simplified classification in which SE is dichotomized as convulsive or nonconvulsive, with nonconvulsive status epilepticus further stratified as focal or generalized.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1490.3-1491
Author(s):  
K. Inoue ◽  
K. Misaki ◽  
N. Dobashi ◽  
M. Miyazaki ◽  
Y. Mako ◽  
...  

Background:Prednisolone (PSL) and HCQ are key drugs in the therapy of SLE. However, since PSL induce many harmful adverse events, PSL is preferred to be reduced especially in the maintenance therapy. The efficacy of HCQ for reducing the dose of PSL has not been revealed yet. So, we focused on the cessation of PSL under the treatment of HCQ with conventional SLE therapy.Objectives:The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of HCQ as co-treatment in the standard therapy of SLE.Methods:SLE patients (n=30) under the maintenance therapy were enrolled in this study. Dose of PSL, titer of anti-DNA antibody, WBC count, serum complement and SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) were examined retrospectively at 0 and 12 months after administration of HCQ.Results:Baseline patient-characteristics are as follows (mean±S.E); the age of patients was 54.4±3.2 years old, 21 patients (70%) were female, the disease duration was 108.5±25.2 months, SLEDAI was 4.0±0.9, the dose of PSL was 10.3±1.7 mg/day, the titer of anti-DNA antibody was 7.3±1.8 IU/ml, C3 was 85±4.3 mg/dl and C4 was 18±1.6 mg/dl.The mean dose of PSL was reduced with statistically significance (pre-administration of HCQ:10.3±1.7 mg/day, 24 months after administration of HCQ:2.2±0.3 mg/day,p<0.0001). Furthermore, in this observation period, 6 patients could achieve the cessation of PSL.SLEDAI was also significantly reduced (4.0±0.9 vs 1.0±0.3,p<0.01).There was no statistical significance between before treatment by HCQ and after treatment in the titer of anti-DNA antibody (7.3±1.8 vs 2.8±1.6 IU/ml,p=0.06), WBC count (6208±4.9 vs 5096±3.3 /μl,p=0.06) and serum complement level (C3 85±4.3 mg/dl vs 89±4.0 mg/dl,p=0.52, C4 18±1.6 mg/dl vs 19±1.4 mg/dl,p=0.45). Relapse of SLE was clarified in only one patient.As for adverse events (AEs), Severe bacterial infection (n=4), herpes zoster (n=1) and patellar tendon rupture (n=1) were revealed. All cases of the AEs were fully recovered.Conclusion:Our study suggested that co-treatment with HCQ on standard SLE therapy could be enable to prevent the flare of SLE and reduce the dose of PSL with statistical significance. In some cases, we could achieve the cessation of PSL treatment.References:None.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 107847
Author(s):  
Lucia Maltoni ◽  
Veronica Di Pisa ◽  
Valentina Marchiani ◽  
Silvia Bonetti ◽  
Duccio Maria Cordelli

Author(s):  
Jana Godau ◽  
Kaushal Bharad ◽  
Johannes Rösche ◽  
Gabor Nagy ◽  
Stefanie Kästner ◽  
...  

Epilepsia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Lattanzi ◽  
Giada Giovannini ◽  
Francesco Brigo ◽  
Niccolò Orlandi ◽  
Eugen Trinka ◽  
...  

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kensuke Nakamura ◽  
◽  
Aiki Marushima ◽  
Yuji Takahashi ◽  
Akio Kimura ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Status epilepticus (SE) is an emergency condition for which rapid and secured cessation is important. Phenytoin and fosphenytoin, the prodrug of phenytoin with less severe adverse effects, have been recommended as second-line treatments. However, fosphenytoin causes severe adverse events, such as hypotension and arrhythmia. Levetiracetam reportedly has similar efficacy and higher safety for SE; however, evidence to support its use for adult SE is lacking. In the present study, a non-inferiority designed multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) is being conducted to compare levetiracetam with fosphenytoin after diazepam as a second-line treatment for SE. Methods This multicenter, prospective, and open-label RCT is conducted in emergency departments. Between December 23, 2019, and March 31, 2023, 176 patients with convulsive SE transported to an emergency room will be randomized into a fosphenytoin group and levetiracetam group at a ratio of 1:1. The definition of SE is “continuous seizures longer than 5 min or discrete seizures longer than 2 min with intervening consciousness disturbance.” In both groups, diazepam is initially administered at 1–20 mg, followed by intravenous fosphenytoin at 22.5 mg/kg or intravenous levetiracetam at 1000–3000 mg. The primary outcome is the seizure cessation rate within 30 min. Seizure recurrence within 24 h, severe adverse events, and intubation rate within 24 h are secondary outcomes. Discussion The present study was approved and conducted as an initiative study of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. If non-inferiority is identified, the society will pursue an application for the national health insurance coverage of levetiracetam for SE via a public knowledge-based application. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs031190160. Registered on December 13, 2019


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1433.1-1433
Author(s):  
J. G. Rademacher ◽  
V. Korendovych ◽  
P. Korsten

Background:The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (RTX) is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). In addition, RTX is used in a wide range of autoimmune diseases. Belimumab (BEL) is an anti-BAFF antibody approved for the treatment of non-renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Europe. These agents are generally well-tolerated but severe adverse events (AEs) can occur. The frequency of and factors associated with AEs are currently unknown.Objectives:To identify adverse events with the use of B-cell directed therapies in a large population of RA, AAV, and SLE.Methods:This is a single-center retrospective cohort study using routine clinical data over a ten-year period (2010-2020). We recorded epidemiological and clinical data of patients receiving either BEL or RTX. Data included age, gender, type of disease, number and efficacy of infusions, patient-years and concomitant treatment. Patient records were screened for AEs, such as infections, anaphylaxis, occurrence of malignant disease, laboratory abnormalities and immunoglobulin (Ig) deficiency. Between group comparisons were performed.Results:Database screening yielded 445 patients treated with RTX and 23 with BEL. After exclusion of patients with incomplete data, 425 RTX and 23 BEL patients were analyzed.Our preliminary analysis of a sample of 60 of these 448 patients (184 patient-years) resulted in 43 patients (72%) with RA, 8 patients with AAV (13%), 5 patients with a renal disease, and 4 patients with mixed connective tissue disease, as well 23 SLE patients. 46 (77%) were female. In RA, a median of 13 treatments of 1000 mg were administered, corresponding to 3.37 patient-years per patient. Primary non-response occurred in 2 patients, secondary non-response in 13 patients. For AAV, a median of 8.4 treatments were given (3.3 patient-years), no treatment failure was detected. SLE patients received a median of 15 treatments.15 patients had infectious complications during treatment, 11 needed treatment. Herpes zoster infection occurred in 3 patients with RA. Three of the 8 patients with AAV had an infection requiring treatment. In SLE patients, only 2 developed infectious complications, and no Ig-deficiency occurred.Lymphopenia was the most common laboratory abnormality detected in 25 patients with RTX, 19 of whom had RA. Ig deficiency was common in RA, affecting 30% of patients. Deficiency of IgM and IgG was recognized in 5 patients each; 1 patient had low levels IgA.Neither the maintenance prednisolone dosage nor Ig deficiency were associated with risk for infection. However, lymphopenia appeared to be associated with risk for infection.Conclusion:Our preliminary data observe a 184 patient-year period. RTX and BEL were generally associated with few AEs. RA patients frequently had laboratory abnormalities (lymphopenia, Ig-deficiency) which did not necessarily translate to clinical events. Infections were more common in AAV, BEL was the best tolerated B-cell directed agent. Overall, our data are reassuring, but we suggest a more careful vigilance in AAV patients.Disclosure of Interests:Jan-Gerd Rademacher: None declared, Viktor Korendovych: None declared, PETER KORSTEN Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Sanofi Aventis, GSK, Chugai, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Consultant of: Lilly, Gilead, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, GSK, Grant/research support from: GSK


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document