Do Individuals Skimp on Health Care After Spouse’s Dementia Diagnosis?

Dementia is a costly disease that places great burden on individuals and families. The substantial time and financial resources taken away by living with persons with dementia (PWDs) may make their spouses forgo essential health care, thus deteriorating long-term health and increasing downstream healthcare costs. However, such negative externality is understudied. This paper studied the impacts of spouse's incident dementia diagnosis on an individual's use of needed care, defined as annual flu shot and regular doctor visits for those with preexisting conditions. Using HRS linked to Medicare claims, I employed a fixed effects approach to compare the use of flu shot and doctor visit during 1 year before and after the index, for individuals whose spouse had dementia (N=691) and otherwise similar controls (N=5,073). After adjusting for time-varying health, caregiving roles, and other socio-demographic factors, spouse’s dementia onset was associated with greater likelihood of getting flu shot and seeing doctors. Among those transitioning into caregiving, spouses of PWDs had a marginally higher risk of skimping on doctor visits, compared to controls (p=0.053). In this broadly representative sample, there lacks evidence for rationed health care ensuing spouse’s dementia incidence, at least within a 1-year time frame. However, for new spousal caregivers, the impact of dementia is more profound and complex than deprivation of time. This group may face a trade-off between caring for spouses with dementia and caring for themselves, for whom policy support merits further study and consideration.

1175. Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy in Hospitalized Children, Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background Influenza vaccine is recommended for all children ≥6 months, yet uptake is suboptimal. We aimed to quantify child influenza vaccine coverage and identify factors associated with influenza vaccine hesitancy (VH) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We conducted a prospective, repeated cross-sectional assessment in English and Spanish of caregiver influenza knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and associated VH among hospitalized children 6 months through 18 years at a large pediatric medical institution. Caregivers were enrolled 4-5 days per week, between 12/11/2019--1/31/2020 and 12/8/2020--4/5/2021. VH was assessed using the Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) survey; PACV score ≥50 denoted VH. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression were used. Results During 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 influenza seasons, 269/282 (95%) and 295/307 (96%) of approached caregivers enrolled, respectively. By caregiver report, 94% of children in 2019-2020 and 91% in 2020-2021 were up-to-date with routine childhood vaccines (p=0.13). Specific to influenza vaccine, 73% and 68% of children received or planned to receive influenza vaccine in 2019-2020 and 2020-2021, respectively (p=0.13). Based on PACV score, 13% of parents were VH in 2019-2020 compared with 17% in 2020-2021 (p=0.24; Figure 1). Caregivers who had not/did not intend to vaccinate their children had a higher family income (71% vs. 57% >&30,000, p< 0.01) and were less likely to be Hispanic/Latino (35% vs. 47%, p=0.02). 77% of caregivers were satisfied with information about influenza vaccine received from healthcare providers. Overall, 36% believed “you can get the flu from the flu shot.” In 2020-2021, caregivers were less likely to believe that “flu can be a dangerous infection in children,” to be “scared of my child getting the flu” and to agree that “all children over 6 months of age should receive the flu shot every year” (Table 1). Table 1. Caregiver knowledge and attitudes about seasonal influenza vaccine, 2019-20 versus 2020-21 Figure 1. Influenza vaccine uptake by PACV score during 2019-2020 (a) and 2020-2021 (b) seasons Conclusion During the COVID-19 pandemic, caregivers of hospitalized children were less concerned about influenza than pre-pandemic and misinformation about influenza and influenza vaccine persisted. Increased efforts may be needed to educate caregivers about the importance of influenza immunization during the 2021-22 season. Disclosures C. Mary Healy, MD, Dexcom (Shareholder)Intuitive (Shareholder)Quidel Corporation (Shareholder)Up to Date (Other Financial or Material Support, Honorarium)Vapotherm (Shareholder)

COVID-19: economic aspects of influenza vaccine prevention

Relevance. A viral pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has led to the development of a new coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). The COVID-19 pandemic has forced the mobilization of all available health system resources. There are separate publications on reducing the risk of developing coronavirus infection in people vaccinated against influenza. Objective: to study the cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination in the conditions of the» first « wave of COVID-19. Materials and methods. The archival data of 2,452 people from among the sick employees of JSC «Russian Railways» were analyzed. The control group consisted of 2,911 employees who were not infected with COVID-19, comparable by gender, age and territory of residence. Scores on the Charlson comorbidity scale were calculated for all individuals. The pharmacoeconomical cost of the patient’s treatment was predicted using the Markov model. Results. Having a flu shot reduced the likelihood of getting COVID-19 by 1.3 times. In the presence of a diagnosis of coronavirus infection, inpatient treatment for influenza vaccinated patients was required 2 times less often than for unvaccinated patients. Compared to the situation of the absence of vaccinated persons, in the «first wave», the estimated cost savings for the treatment of patients with coronavirus infection amounted to 124 million rubles. When the number of points on the comorbidity scale increased from 1 to 8, the average cost of treatment of patients without previous influenza vaccination increased by 2 times, and in the presence of vaccination, the average cost of treatment increased by 1.7 times. Conclusion. Thus, this study shows that influenza vaccination is cost-effective against COVID-19. The effect is achieved by reducing the likelihood of getting a coronavirus infection in the presence of a flu shot.

Influenza infection, Acute myocardial Infarction, Flu Shot during COVID-19 Pandemic in US population. A Review of Literature.

Influenza is a major cause of hospitalization in all age groups but can cause more severe infections in specific high-risk population. Novel Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and Influenza virus infection cause similar illness and coexist. Cardiovascular complications due to influenza are important causes of morbidity and mortality in the US, especially in the elderly population (aged more than 65 years). Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is the most serious among the cardiovascular causes of mortality following the attack of influenza, mainly in patients with various co-morbidities like pre-existing coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), and heart failure (HF). We have reviewed the association between influenza virus infection and AMI and extrapolated the beneficial effects of influenza vaccine in preventing AMI and its grave consequences. We have also highlighted about the importance of flu shot during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Factors Associated with Influenza & Tdap Vaccine Uptake in Pregnant Patients at the UT Family Medicine Clinic in Memphis

INTRODUCTION: Given the increased risk for infections among pregnant patients and newborns, vaccination against influenza (>50,000,000 annual US cases affecting all ages) and pertussis (>15,000 annual US cases disproportionately affecting newborns) are recommended among pregnant patients in order to protect them and their babies via passive immunity to cover a newborn’s window of vaccine ineligibility. Though flu and Tdap vaccination rates among pregnant patients have been trending upwards nationally, there is still room for improvement to achieve optimal rates. OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives were to study factors that affect the vaccination rates at the University of Tennessee Family Medicine Clinic at Memphis (UTFMC-M), compare those rates with national pregnancy flu/Tdap vaccination rates, and to generate recommendations based off observed factors associated with vaccine uptake to improve flu/Tdap vaccination rates in UTFMC-M pregnant patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of UTFMC-M patients who were pregnant from September 1, 2019-April 24, 2020 (included 2019-2020 flu season) (n=465). Variables studied included demographic data (race, age, insurance), immunization history (vaccine status, history of physician encouragement), and prenatal history (parity, number of prenatal visits, trimester at first visit, high risk clinic (HRC) admittance status). Vaccination status was based on ACIP recommendations (Flu shot eligible = any gestational age; Tdap eligible = ≥27 weeks). Positive HRC admittance was noted for patients with ≥2 visits to the UTFMC-M HRC, a clinic that specializes in high risk pregnant patient care. RESULTS: The patient sample was predominantly black (84.3%) and insured by Medicaid programs (88%). Among eligible UTFMC-M pregnant patients, 50.1% were flu-vaccinated (n=465); 73.8% were Tdap-vaccinated (n=317); and 52.1% were Flu+Tdap-vaccinated (n=317). No significant associations were found between vaccine uptake and HRC status, parity, and age. However, statistically significant relationships were found between vaccine uptake and physician encouragement (positive relationship with flu shot: X2(1, N = 465) =131, p < 0.001, Tdap: X2 (6, N = 465) =476, p < 0.001), number of prenatal visits (flu shot group median 8 visits, Tdap group median 9 visits vs. unvaccinated group median 4 visits; p < 0.001), and early trimester age at first prenatal visit (X2(6, N = 465) =47.635 , p CONCLUSION: 2019-2020 UTFMC-M vaccination rates were on par with 2018-2019 US flu vaccine rates and higher than 2018-2019 US Tdap and Flu+Tdap rates. There were statistically significant relationships between vaccine uptake at UTFMC-M and physician encouragement, number of prenatal visits, and early trimester age at first prenatal visit but no significant relationships with UTFMC-M HRC admittance, parity, or age. Recommendations following from our observations to address further vaccine rate improvement include: continue vaccine encouragement, continue booking multiple visits (8 for flu, 9 for Tdap), prioritize Tdap vaccine higher for late trimester intake patients, and focus on flu vaccine encouragement and education.