scholarly journals Treatment of unstable pelvic ring injury with a dual internal anterior subcutaneous fixator using spinal instrumentation called “dual INFIX”: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Sasagawa

Introduction: External fixation, various subcutaneous screw fixations, and plate fixation can be considered as fixation methods for unstable pelvic ring fractures. We describe a first case of treated unstable pelvic ring injury using a dual internal anterior subcutaneous fixator we called “dual INFIX,” comprising four screws, two subcutaneous rods, and two cross-link connectors, without posterior fixation. Case Report: An 81-year-old man sustained an unstable pelvic injury (AO type B2) with fracture of the left ilium and pubis. Dual INFIX was used to stabilize the pelvic ring injury. Polyaxial screws were introduced along a path between the anterior inferior iliac spine and ipsilateral posterior superior iliac spine until the head of the screw lay immediately above the fascia. Bilateral cranial screws were connected by a rod passed subcutaneously, and caudal screws were connected by the other rod. Finally, cross-link connectors connected cranial and caudal rods on the right and left. One year after the first operation, the patient could walk without a cane and had no limitation of daily living and bony fusion was achieved. Conclusion: The stability of the pelvic ring of dual INFIX was sufficient to achieve bony fusion in this case. The stability of dual INFIX should be stronger than that of INFIX. Dual INFIX as with INFIX has other advantages such as ease of management compared with external fixation, and nonnecessity of strict anatomical reduction compared with various percutaneous screw fixation. Furthermore, this technique is simple and minimally invasive compared with plate fixation because it does not require open surgery. However, because the type C fracture with an unacceptable position of reduction by closed reduction has the possibility to become a symptomatic malunion, such cases should not be treated by this method. Furthermore, it is necessary for pelvic stabilization using dual INFIX that the contralateral pelvis is intact because dual INFIX stabilizes

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Dong Chang ◽  
Young Jin Seo ◽  
Yong Hyuck Choi

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Yongtao Lu ◽  
Yiqian He ◽  
Weiteng Li ◽  
Zhuoyue Yang ◽  
Ruifei Peng ◽  
...  

Background. A large number of pelvic injuries are seriously unstable, with mortality rates reaching 19%. Approximately 60% of pelvic injuries are related to the posterior pelvic ring. However, the selection of a fixation method for a posterior pelvic ring injury remains a challenging problem for orthopedic surgeons. The aim of the present study is to investigate the biomechanical performance of five different fixation approaches for posterior pelvic ring injury and thus provide guidance on the choice of treatment approach in a clinical setting. Methods. A finite element (FE) model, including the L3-L5 lumbar vertebrae, sacrum, and full pelvis, was created from CT images of a healthy adult. Tile B and Tile C types of pelvic fractures were created in the model. Five different fixation methods for fixing the posterior ring injury (PRI) were simulated: TA1 (conservative treatment), TA2 (S1 screw fixation), TA3 (S1 + S2 screw fixation), TA4 (plate fixation), and TA5 (modified triangular osteosynthesis). Based on the fixation status (fixed or nonfixed) of the anterior ring and the fixation method for PRI, 20 different FE models were created. An upright standing loading scenario was simulated, and the resultant displacements at the sacroiliac joint were compared between different models. Results. When TA5 was applied, the resultant displacements at the sacroiliac joint were the smallest (1.5 mm, 1.6 mm, 1.6 mm, and 1.7 mm) for all the injury cases. The displacements induced by TA3 and TA2 were similar to those induced by TA5. TA4 led to larger displacements at the sacroiliac joint (2.3 mm, 2.4 mm, 4.8 mm, and 4.9 mm), and TA1 was the worst case (3.1 mm, 3.2 mm, 6.3 mm, and 6.5 mm). Conclusions. The best internal fixation method for PRI is the triangular osteosynthesis approach (TA5), followed by S1 + S2 screw fixation (TA3), S1 screw fixation (TA2), and plate fixation (TA4).


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyoung-Keun Oh ◽  
Suk Kyu Choo ◽  
Jung-Jae Kim ◽  
Mark Lee

Injury ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 1179-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Soultanis ◽  
Georgios I. Karaliotas ◽  
Dimitrios Mastrokalos ◽  
Vassileios I. Sakellariou ◽  
Konstantinos A. Starantzis ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 795-801
Author(s):  
Paphon Sa-ngasoongsong ◽  
Norachart Sirisreetreerux ◽  
Pongsthorn Chanplakorn ◽  
Patarawan Woratanarat ◽  
Chanyut Suphachatwong ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document