scholarly journals Morphing Wing-Tip Open Loop Controller and its Validation During Wind Tunnel Tests at the IAR-NRC

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 41-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
GUEZGUEZ Mohamed Sadok ◽  
◽  
BOTEZ Ruxandra Mihaela ◽  
MAMOU Mahmoud ◽  
MEBARKI Youssef ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 136-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliviu Şugar Gabor ◽  
Andreea Koreanschi ◽  
Ruxandra Mihaela Botez ◽  
Mahmoud Mamou ◽  
Youssef Mebarki

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lourelay Moreira dos Santos ◽  
Guilherme Ferreira Gomes ◽  
Rogerio F. Coimbra

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the aerodynamic characteristics of a low-to-moderate-aspect-ratio, tapered, untwisted, unswept wing, equipped of sheared wing tips. Design/methodology/approach In this work, wind tunnel tests were made to study the influence in aerodynamic characteristics over a typical low-to-moderate-aspect-ratio wing of a general aviation aircraft, equipped with sheared – swept and tapered planar – wing tips. An experimental parametric study of different wing tips was tested. Variations in its leading and trailing edge sweep angle as well as variations in wing tip taper ratio were considered. Sheared wing tips modify the flow pattern in the outboard region of the wing producing a vortex flow at the wing tip leading edge, enhancing lift at high angles of attack. Findings The induced drag is responsible for nearly 50% of aircraft total drag and can be reduced through modifications to the wing tip. Some wing tip models present complex geometries and many of them present benefits in particular flight conditions. Results have demonstrated that sweeping the wing tip leading edge between 60 and 65 degrees offers an increment in wing aerodynamic efficiency, especially at high lift conditions. However, results have demonstrated that moderate wing tip taper ratio (0.50) has better aerodynamic benefits than highly tapered wing tips (from 0.25 to 0.15), even with little less wing tip leading edge sweep angle (from 57 to 62 degrees). The moderate wing tip taper ratio (0.50) offers more wing area and wing span than the wings with highly tapered wing tips, for the same aspect ratio wing. Originality/value Although many studies have been reported on the aerodynamics of wing tips, most of them presented complex non-planar geometries and were developed for cruise flight in high subsonic regime (low lift coefficient). In this work, an exploration and parametric study through wind tunnel tests were made, to evaluate the influence in aerodynamic characteristics of a low-to-moderate-aspect-ratio, tapered, untwisted, unswept wing, equipped of sheared wing tips (wing tips highly swept and tapered).


2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 1346-1355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei V. Popov ◽  
Lucian T. Grigorie ◽  
Ruxandra Botez ◽  
Mahmood Mamou ◽  
Youssef Mebarki

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuting Dai ◽  
Chao Yang

A unified autoregressive (AR) model is identified, based on the wind tunnel test data of open-loop gust response for an aircraft model. The identified AR model can be adapted to various flow velocities in the wind tunnel test. Due to the lack of discrete gust input measurement, a second-order polynomial function is used to approximate the gust input amplitude by flow velocity. Afterwards, with the identified online aeroelastic model, the modified generalized predictive control (GPC) theory is applied to alleviate wing tip acceleration induced by sinusoidal gust. Finally, the alleviation effects of gust response at different flow velocities are estimated based on the comparison of simulated closed-loop acceleration with experimental open-loop one. The comparison indicates that, after gust response alleviation, the wing tip acceleration can be reduced up to 20% at the tested velocities ranging from 12 m/s to 24 m/s. Demonstratively, the unified control law can be adapted to varying wind tunnel velocities and gust frequencies. It does not need to be altered at different test conditions, which will save the idle time.


2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 1309-1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei V. Popov ◽  
Lucian T. Grigorie ◽  
Ruxandra Botez ◽  
Mahmoud Mamou ◽  
Youssef Mébarki

1976 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 495-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Costen ◽  
R. E. Davidson ◽  
G. T. Rogers

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 561-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Joël Tchatchueng Kammegne ◽  
Ruxandra Mihaela Botez ◽  
Lucian Teodor Grigorie ◽  
Mahmoud Mamou ◽  
Youssef Mébarki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document