Time to Finger Point or Fix? An Invitation to Join Ongoing Efforts to Promote Ethical Authorship and Other Good Publication Practices

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1084-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L Woolley ◽  
Art Gertel ◽  
Cindy W Hamilton ◽  
Adam Jacobs ◽  
Gene P Snyder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Good Publication ◽  
Publication Practices ◽  
Ethical Authorship

scholarly journals A guide to applying the Good Publication Practice 3 Guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blair Hesp ◽  
Katshisa Arai ◽  
Magdalene Chu ◽  
Stefanie Chuah ◽  
Jose Miguel Curameng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
International Committee ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Pacific Region ◽  
Asia Pacific Region ◽  
Journal Editors ◽  
Cultural Expectations ◽  
Good Publication ◽  
Publication Practices ◽  
Medical Writers

Numerous recommendations and guidelines aim to improve the quality, timeliness and transparency of medical publications. However, these guidelines use ambiguous language that can be challenging to interpret, particularly for speakers of English as a second language. Cultural expectations within the Asia-Pacific region raise additional challenges. Several studies have suggested that awareness and application of ethical publication practices in the Asia-Pacific region is relatively low compared with other regions. However, guidance on applying ethical publication practice guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region is lacking. This review aims to improve publication practices in the Asia-Pacific region by providing guidance on applying the 10 principles of the Good Publication Practice 3 (GPP3) guidelines and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship. Recommendations are provided for encore presentations, applying the ICMJE authorship criteria in the context of regional cultural expectations, and the role of study sponsors and professional medical writers. Ongoing barriers to compliance with guidelines are also highlighted, and additional guidance is provided to support authors submitting manuscripts for publication. The roles of regional journals, regulatory authorities and professional bodies in improving practices are also discussed.

scholarly journals A guide to applying the Good Publication Practice 3 Guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blair Hesp ◽  
Katsuhisa Arai ◽  
Magdalene Chu ◽  
Stefanie Chuah ◽  
Jose Miguel Curameng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
International Committee ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Pacific Region ◽  
Asia Pacific Region ◽  
Journal Editors ◽  
Cultural Expectations ◽  
Good Publication ◽  
Publication Practices ◽  
Medical Writers

Numerous recommendations and guidelines aim to improve the quality, timeliness and transparency of medical publications. However, these guidelines use ambiguous language that can be challenging to interpret, particularly for speakers of English as a second language. Cultural expectations within the Asia-Pacific region raise additional challenges. Several studies have suggested that awareness and application of ethical publication practices in the Asia-Pacific region is relatively low compared with other regions. However, guidance on applying ethical publication practice guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region is lacking. This review aims to improve publication practices in the Asia-Pacific region by providing guidance on applying the 10 principles of the Good Publication Practice 3 (GPP3) guidelines and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship. Recommendations are provided for encore presentations, applying the ICMJE authorship criteria in the context of regional cultural expectations, and the role of study sponsors and professional medical writers. Ongoing barriers to compliance with guidelines are also highlighted, and additional guidance is provided to support authors submitting manuscripts for publication. The roles of regional journals, regulatory authorities and professional bodies in improving practices are also discussed.

scholarly journals A guide to applying the Good Publication Practice 3 guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Blair R. Hesp ◽  
Katsuhisa Arai ◽  
Magdalene Y. S. Chu ◽  
Stefanie Chuah ◽  
Jose Miguel B. Curameng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
International Committee ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Pacific Region ◽  
Asia Pacific Region ◽  
Journal Editors ◽  
Cultural Expectations ◽  
Good Publication ◽  
Publication Practices ◽  
Medical Writers

Abstract Numerous recommendations and guidelines aim to improve the quality, timeliness and transparency of medical publications. However, these guidelines use ambiguous language that can be challenging to interpret, particularly for speakers of English as a second language. Cultural expectations within the Asia-Pacific region raise additional challenges and several studies have suggested that awareness and application of ethical publication practices in the Asia-Pacific region is relatively low compared with other regions. However, guidance on applying ethical publication practice guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region is lacking. This commentary aims to improve publication practices in the Asia-Pacific region by providing guidance on applying the 10 principles of the Good Publication Practice 3 (GPP3) guidelines and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship. Recommendations are provided for encore presentations, applying the ICMJE authorship criteria in the context of regional cultural expectations, and the role of study sponsors and professional medical writers. Ongoing barriers to compliance with guidelines are also highlighted, and additional guidance is provided to support authors submitting manuscripts for publication. The roles of regional journals, regulatory authorities and professional bodies in improving practices are also discussed.

scholarly journals Epidemiological studies in the work of young scientists. Good publication practices

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-30
Author(s):  
Andrei Shpakou ◽  
Aleksander Szpakou
Keyword(s):  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Good Publication ◽  
Publication Practices

Badania epidemiologiczne zajmują ważną pozycję w pracach młodych naukowców. Jednym z najważniejszych celów epidemiologii chorób niezakaźnych jest badanie występowania cech stanów, zdarzeń związanych ze zdrowiem w określonych populacjach. To z kolei jest ściśle związane z oceną czynników wpływających na stan zdrowia, których znajomość jest podstawą informacji do wykorzystywania przez służbę zdrowia i inne instytucje. Młody naukowiec oprócz planowania i wykonywania badań musi opisywać ich wyniki oraz publikować w czasopismach. Tylko pełna publikacja w recenzowanym czasopiśmie ma największą wartość naukową. Artykuł przedstawia epidemiologię jako naukę i metodologię poprzez definicje, klasyfikacje i główne cele. W skrócie przedstawiono epidemiologię jako narzędzie dla oceny sytuacji zdrowotnej społeczeństwa i omówiono ważniejsze zasady dobrej praktyki publikacyjnej wyników badań epidemiologicznych.

scholarly journals A guide to applying the Good Publication Practice 3 Guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blair Hesp ◽  
Katsuhisa Arai ◽  
Magdalene Chu ◽  
Stefanie Chuah ◽  
Jose Miguel Curameng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
International Committee ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Pacific Region ◽  
Asia Pacific Region ◽  
Journal Editors ◽  
Cultural Expectations ◽  
Good Publication ◽  
Publication Practices ◽  
Medical Writers

Numerous recommendations and guidelines aim to improve the quality, timeliness and transparency of medical publications. However, these guidelines use ambiguous language that can be challenging to interpret, particularly for speakers of English as a second language. Cultural expectations within the Asia-Pacific region raise additional challenges. Several studies have suggested that awareness and application of ethical publication practices in the Asia-Pacific region is relatively low compared with other regions. However, guidance on applying ethical publication practice guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region is lacking. This review aims to improve publication practices in the Asia-Pacific region by providing guidance on applying the 10 principles of the Good Publication Practice 3 (GPP3) guidelines and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship. Recommendations are provided for encore presentations, applying the ICMJE authorship criteria in the context of regional cultural expectations, and the role of study sponsors and professional medical writers. Ongoing barriers to compliance with guidelines are also highlighted, and additional guidance is provided to support authors submitting manuscripts for publication. The roles of regional journals, regulatory authorities and professional bodies in improving practices are also discussed.

‘... Call the Mute Artifacts to Speech’: New Essays on the History of Archeology

2018 ◽  
pp. 1274-1279
Author(s):  
Elena V. Olimpieva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
20Th Century ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Early 20Th Century ◽  
Historical Overview ◽  
Historical Experience ◽  
Historical Material ◽  
Manuscript Tradition ◽  
History Of ◽  
Publication Practices ◽  
Controversial Nature

The article reviews O. A. Shashkova’s ‘... Call the Mute Artifacts to Speech.’ Essays on the History of Archaeography of the 15th - Early 20th Century. Wide array of sources and broad geographical frameworks allow Shashkova to present emergence and development of Russian and European archaeography from the 15th to early 20th century intelligibly enough for educational purposes. A whole chapter is devoted to the manuscript tradition and publishing of sources before Gutenberg. When considering the formation of archaeographical tradition, the author uses comparative method. O. A. Shashkova offers a historical overview and analyzes theoretical and practical issues of archaeography. The reviewer notes the significance of the chosen topic due to a need to reconsider the development of publishing in light of modern views on archaeography and to make it accessible to students and non-professionals. She notes traditional academic approach of O. A. Shashkova to presentation of the development publication practices. The review considers the possibility of using the ‘Essays...’ in studying the history of archaeography and offers possible directions for a broader consideration of historical experience, in particular, of Novikov’s publication projects. The review notes the controversial nature of the author’s approach to systematization of her large historical material in order to consider issues concerning the study of archaeographical practices. It stresses that coverage of issues of development of methods of preparation of publications separately from its historical and practical aspects hinders successful mastering of the material by an untrained reader. It concludes that the publication has high practical value for specialists in archaeography and students.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document