Does the ICD 10 classification accurately describe subtypes of borderline personality disorder?

2000 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Whewell ◽  
A. Ryman ◽  
D. Bonanno ◽  
N. Heather
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 723-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper N⊘rgaard Kjær ◽  
Robert Biskin ◽  
Claus Vestergaard ◽  
Povl Munk-J⊘rgensen

Patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) are known to present frequently in emergency rooms, and they have a high rate of suicide. The mortality rate of patients with BPD is still unclear. The Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register and The Danish Register for Causes of Death were used to identify patients with a first-ever diagnosis of BPD (ICD-10: F60.31) from 1995 through 2011 together with time and cause of death. A total of 10,545 patients with a BPD diagnosis were followed for a mean time of 7.98 years. A total of 547 deaths were registered. The standardized mortality ratio of patients with BPD compared to the general population was 8.3 (95% CI [7.6, 9.1]). More than three inpatient admissions per year or a comorbid diagnosis of substance use disorder correlated with a higher mortality rate. The increased mortality rate in patients with BPD treated in secondary care emphasizes that it is a severe mental disorder.


Author(s):  
Tom Burns ◽  
Mike Firn

This chapter deals with the controversial issue of personality disorder, whether these are meaningful diagnoses and, if so, how they affect management. The classification is entirely pragmatic: the definitions and classification in both ICD-10 and DSM-V are outlined along with proposals to abandon categories in favour of a dimensional approach. The issue of treatability is explored, but we conclude that ignoring personality and personality disorders is not a viable alternative for outreach workers. Most of the chapter deals with the management of dissocial personality disorder (usually in men) and borderline personality disorder (usually in women). Specific psychotherapies are not dealt with here; the focus is on how to use team work to manage individuals with severe mental illness and disorders of personality.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S71-S71
Author(s):  
N.P. Lekka ◽  
G. Carr ◽  
T. Gilpin ◽  
B. Eyo

IntroductionNICE guidelines advise to consider admission for patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) for the management of crises involving significant risk to self or others. Furthermore, to consider structured psychological interventions of greater than three months’ duration and twice-weekly sessions according to patients’ needs and wishes.ObjectivesWe aimed to assess reasons for admission and access to psychological interventions in an acute inpatient BPD population.MethodsCase notes of patients with a diagnosis of BPD (ICD-10 F60.3 and F60.31), discharged from four acute general adult wards in Sheffield during a period of twelve months were studied retrospectively, using a structured questionnaire based on BPD NICE guidance.ResultsOf the 83 identified BPD patients, seventy-eight percent were female and 82% between 16–45 years old. Eleven patients had four or more admissions. Eighty percent reported suicidal ideation at admission, with 50% having acted on it (70% by overdose, 50% cutting, 10% hanging). Of this cohort, 58% reported they intended to die. Psychosocial factors at admission were identified in 59 cases, including relationship breakdown (47.5%), alcohol/drug use (30.5%) and accommodation issues (17%). Disturbed/aggressive behaviour was documented in 27.1% of these cases. Sixty-eight percent of patients had psychology input in the 5 years preadmission: 38% (21 patients) received structured therapy, whilst 62% received only one assessment or advise to teams.ConclusionsPatients were mainly admitted for risk management. A high proportion received unstructured psychological interventions. Services offering structured psychological interventions should be supported, as hospitalisations only temporarily address BPD patients’ suicidality and psychosocial difficulties.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony P. Winston

Patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD; known in ICD–10 (World Health Organization, 1992) as emotionally unstable personality disorder) pose some of the most difficult management problems facing the clinical psychiatrist. They frequently present in crisis, but are often difficult to engage in any form of treatment. Their behaviour causes considerable anxiety but their ambivalence about treatment often leaves professionals feeling frustrated and resentful. These feelings can all too easily be transformed into therapeutic nihilism. As well as being a significant problem in its own right, comorbid personality disturbance complicates the management of other psychiatric disorders and has a negative effect on their prognosis (Reich & Vasile, 1993).


2019 ◽  
Vol 270 (8) ◽  
pp. 969-978
Author(s):  
Maja Zandersen ◽  
Josef Parnas

Abstract We have previously argued that the current borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis is over-inclusive and clinically and conceptually impossible to distinguish from the schizophrenia spectrum disorders. This study involves 30 patients clinically diagnosed with BPD as their main diagnosis by three BPD dedicated outpatient treatment facilities in Denmark. The patients underwent a careful and time-consuming psychiatric evaluation involving several senior level clinical psychiatrists and researchers and a comprehensive battery of psychopathological scales. The study found that the vast majority of patients (67% in DSM-5 and 77% in ICD-10) in fact met the criteria for a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, i.e., schizophrenia (20%) or schizotypal (personality) disorder (SPD). The schizophrenia spectrum group scored significantly higher on the level of disorders of core self as measured by the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experiences Scale (EASE). The BPD criterion of “identity disturbance” was significantly correlated with the mean total score of EASE. These findings are discussed in the light of changes from prototypical to polythetic diagnostic systems. We argue that the original prototypes/gestalts informing the creation of BPD and SPD have gone into oblivion during the evolution of polythetic criteria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document