Victim/Survivor Perception of Bystander Helpfulness in Dating Abuse Situations

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-498
Author(s):  
Jill C. Hoxmeier
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie M. Edwards ◽  
Christine A. Gidycz

2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052098548
Author(s):  
Emily F. Rothman ◽  
Carlos A. Cuevas ◽  
Elizabeth A. Mumford ◽  
Eva Bahrami ◽  
Bruce G. Taylor

This article describes a new instrument that assesses adolescent dating abuse (ADA) victimization and perpetration. The Measure of Adolescent Relationship Harassment and Abuse (MARSHA) is a comprehensive instrument that includes items on physical, sexual, and psychological ADA, as well as cyber dating abuse, social control, and invasion of privacy. Data for this study came from a population-based, nationally representative sample of adolescents ages 11 to 21 years old ( N = 1,257). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted for the victimization and perpetration versions of the MARSHA, and convergent and divergent validity were assessed using the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) and the juvenile victimization questionnaire (JVQ), respectively. Results suggest that the MARSHA has good reliability and validity, and that each subscale had good internal consistency. The authors propose that the MARSHA may be a strong alternative to the CADRI or the conflict tactics scale (CTS) because it reflects contemporary forms of abuse, such as online harassment and pressure to send nude selfies, and the nonconsensual dissemination of sexually explicit images.


Public Health ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 147-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Van Ouytsel ◽  
K. Ponnet ◽  
M. Walrave ◽  
J.R. Temple

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 733-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily F. Rothman ◽  
Anita Nagaswaran ◽  
Renee M. Johnson ◽  
Kelley M. Adams ◽  
Juliane Scrivens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 1206-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Mumford ◽  
Bruce G. Taylor ◽  
Peggy C. Giordano

Research has pointed to the salience of friendships in predicting abuse in adolescent dating relationships. The current study investigates the perpetration of physical and sexual dating abuse as predicted by individual conditional tolerance for dating abuse within the context of friendship behaviors and group characteristics. Using two waves of the National Survey of Teen Relationships and Intimate Violence (STRiV; N = 511 daters aged 12-18 years), we investigated the effects of baseline individual tolerance for hitting dating partners and friendship factors on perpetration of physical and sexual adolescent dating abuse (ADA) approximately 1 year later. Conditional tolerance for hitting boyfriends was associated with ADA perpetration in the absence of friendship characteristics. Daters who reported recent discussion of a problem with friends and female daters who named all-girl friendship groups were more likely to report ADA perpetration. Close friendships are an avenue for preventing ADA perpetration. Furthermore, ADA perpetration may be reduced by targeting conditional tolerance for violence particularly against male partners within female friendship groups.


2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Ann Freeman ◽  
Barri Rosenbluth ◽  
Laura Cotton
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 026540752110652
Author(s):  
Yu Lu ◽  
Joris Van Ouytsel ◽  
Jeff R. Temple

While studies have identified associations between cyber and in-person dating abuse, most research has relied on cross-sectional data, limiting the ability to determine temporality. This study tested the longitudinal associations between cyber and physical and psychological forms of in-person dating abuse. Data were from an ongoing longitudinal study following a group of high school students originally recruited in Southeast Texas, US, into their young adulthood. Three waves of data (Waves 4–6) were used, with each wave collected one year apart. At Wave 4, participants’ age ranged from 16 years to 20 years (mean = 18.1, median = 18.0, SD = .78). The analytical sample consisted of 879 adolescents/young adults (59% female, 41% male; 32% Hispanics, 28% Black, 29% White, and 11% other) who completed the dating abuse questions. Cross-lagged panel analysis showed that dating abuse victimization and perpetration were predictive of subsequent dating abuse of the same type. Cyber dating abuse perpetration was found to predict subsequent physical dating abuse perpetration as well as physical dating abuse victimization, but not vice versa. Further, cyber dating abuse perpetration predicted psychological dating abuse victimization, but not vice versa. Cyber dating abuse victimization was not significantly associated with either physical or psychological dating abuse temporally. Overall, findings suggest that cyber dating abuse perpetration may be a risk marker for both physical and psychological forms of in-person dating abuse. Interventions may benefit from targeting cyber dating abuse perpetration as means to prevent in-person dating abuse.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document