scholarly journals Development of an all-optical framing camera and its application on the Z-pinch

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (25) ◽  
pp. 32074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Song ◽  
Bodong Peng ◽  
Hong-Xing Wang ◽  
Guzhou Song ◽  
Binkang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Z Pinch ◽  
1962 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1191-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. L. Curzon ◽  
R. J. Churchill

The Z-pinch discharge in nitrogen has been studied by means of a high-speed framing camera. Pressure dependence of pre-pinch striations and electrode effects is reported. Development of Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities after the first pinch is verified, and the dispersion relationship is evaluated for the fastest growing m = 0 mode at a pressure of 100 μ Hg.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 8721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilong Gao ◽  
Kai He ◽  
Jinshou Tian ◽  
Chunmin Zhang ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
...  

1963 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1547-1553
Author(s):  
F. L. Curzon ◽  
R. T. Hodgson ◽  
R. J. Churchill

The paper presents the first photographic evidence of the delayed implosion of the Z-pinch in nitrogen at pressures in excess of 375 μ Hg. Two implosions are observed before the discharge column is compressed to its minimum diameter. The time interval between the two implosions is found to increase linearly with pressure.The radius of the discharge column as a function of time is measured with a framing camera and is also calculated from the electrical characteristics of the discharge. By comparing the computed and measured values of the radius of the discharge column at given pressures, it has been shown that the second implosion does not arise from a transfer of the discharge current into material near the walls of the discharge vessel, in contrast to results commonly observed in very energetic discharges.


1997 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 656-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Muron ◽  
M. J. Hurst ◽  
M. S. Derzon
Keyword(s):  
Z Pinch ◽  

Author(s):  
R. Hegerl ◽  
A. Feltynowski ◽  
B. Grill

Till now correlation functions have been used in electron microscopy for two purposes: a) to find the common origin of two micrographs representing the same object, b) to check the optical parameters e. g. the focus. There is a third possibility of application, if all optical parameters are constant during a series of exposures. In this case all differences between the micrographs can only be caused by different noise distributions and by modifications of the object induced by radiation.Because of the electron noise, a discrete bright field image can be considered as a stochastic series Pm,where i denotes the number of the image and m (m = 1,.., M) the image element. Assuming a stable object, the expectation value of Pm would be Ηm for all images. The electron noise can be introduced by addition of stationary, mutual independent random variables nm with zero expectation and the variance. It is possible to treat the modifications of the object as a noise, too.


1988 ◽  
Vol 49 (C2) ◽  
pp. C2-459-C2-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. A.P. TOOLEY ◽  
B. S. WHERRETT ◽  
N. C. CRAFT ◽  
M. R. TAGHIZADEH ◽  
J. F. SNOWDON ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Golingo ◽  
U. Shumlak ◽  
B. Nelson
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document