scholarly journals Correction: Dynamics of Distraction: Competition among Auditory Streams Modulates Gain and Disrupts Inter-Trial Phase Coherence in the Human Electroencephalogram

Author(s):  
Karla D. Ponjavic-Conte ◽  
Dillon A. Hambrook ◽  
Sebastian Pavlovic ◽  
Matthew S. Tata
PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e53953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla D. Ponjavic-Conte ◽  
Dillon A. Hambrook ◽  
Sebastian Pavlovic ◽  
Matthew S. Tata

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J Davidson ◽  
David Alais ◽  
Jeroen JA van Boxtel ◽  
Naotsugu Tsuchiya

The attentional sampling hypothesis suggests that attention rhythmically enhances sensory processing when attending to a single (~8 Hz), or multiple (~4 Hz) objects. Here, we investigated whether attention samples sensory representations that are not part of the conscious percept during binocular rivalry. When crossmodally cued toward a conscious image, subsequent changes in consciousness occurred at ~8 Hz, consistent with the rates of undivided attentional sampling. However, when attention was cued toward the suppressed image, changes in consciousness slowed to ~3.5 Hz, indicating the division of attention away from the conscious visual image. In the electroencephalogram, we found that at attentional sampling frequencies, the strength of inter-trial phase-coherence over fronto-temporal and parieto-occipital regions correlated with changes in perception. When cues were not task-relevant, these effects disappeared, confirming that perceptual changes were dependent upon the allocation of attention, and that attention can flexibly sample away from a conscious image in a task-dependent manner.


NeuroImage ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 202 ◽  
pp. 116055
Author(s):  
M. Eidelman-Rothman ◽  
E. Ben-Simon ◽  
D. Freche ◽  
A. Keil ◽  
T. Hendler ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquin Rapela ◽  
Marissa Westerfield ◽  
Jeanne Townsend ◽  
Scott Makeig

AbstractExpecting events in time leads to more efficient behavior. A remarkable early finding in the study of temporal expectancy is the foreperiod effect on reaction times; i.e., the fact that the time period between a warning signal and an impendent stimuli, to which subjects are instructed to respond as quickly as possible, influences reaction times. Recently it has been shown that the phase of oscillatory activity preceding stimulus presentation is related to behavior. Here we connect both of these findings by reporting a novel foreperiod effect on the inter-trial phase coherence triggered by a stimulus to which subjects do not respond. Until now, inter-trial phase coherence has been used to describe a regularity in the phases of groups of trials. We propose a single-trial measure of inter-trial phase coherence and prove its soundness. Equipped with this measure, and using a multivariate decoding method, we demonstrate that the foreperiod duration modulates single-trial phase coherence. In principle, this modulation could be an artifact due to the decoding method used to detect it. We show that this is not the case, since the modulation can also be observed with a very simple averaging method. Although real, the single-trial modulation of inter-trial phase coherence by the foreperiod duration could just reflect a nuisance in our data. We argue against this possibility by showing that the strength of the modulation correlates with subjects’ behavioral measures, both error rates and mean-reaction times. We anticipate that the new foreperiod effect on inter-trial phase coherence, and the decoding method used here to detect it, will be important tools to understand cognition at the single-trial level. In Part II of this manuscript, we support this claim, by showing that attention modulates the strength of the new foreperiod effect in a trial-by-trial basis.


NeuroImage ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 912-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goran Papenberg ◽  
Dorothea Hämmerer ◽  
Viktor Müller ◽  
Ulman Lindenberger ◽  
Shu-Chen Li

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 390-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael X Cohen ◽  
Christian E. Elger ◽  
Juergen Fell

Electroencephalogram oscillations recorded both within and over the medial frontal cortex have been linked to a range of cognitive functions, including positive and negative feedback processing. Medial frontal oscillatory characteristics during decision making remain largely unknown. Here, we examined oscillatory activity of the human medial frontal cortex recorded while subjects played a competitive decision-making game. Distinct patterns of power and cross-trial phase coherence in multiple frequency bands were observed during different decision-related processes (e.g., feedback anticipation vs. feedback processing). Decision and feedback processing were accompanied by a broadband increase in cross-trial phase coherence at around 220 msec, and dynamic fluctuations in power. Feedback anticipation was accompanied by a shift in the power spectrum from relatively lower (delta and theta) to higher (alpha and beta) power. Power and cross-trial phase coherence were greater following losses compared to wins in theta, alpha, and beta frequency bands, but were greater following wins compared to losses in the delta band. Finally, we found that oscillation power in alpha and beta frequency bands were synchronized with the phase of delta and theta oscillations (“phase–amplitude coupling”). This synchronization differed between losses and wins, suggesting that phase–amplitude coupling might reflect a mechanism of feedback valence coding in the medial frontal cortex. Our findings link medial frontal oscillations to decision making, with relations among activity in different frequency bands suggesting a phase-utilizing coding of feedback valence information.


2020 ◽  
Vol 238 (5) ◽  
pp. 1177-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Engel ◽  
Adrian Schütz ◽  
Milosz Krala ◽  
Jakob C. B. Schwenk ◽  
Adam P. Morris ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew James Davidson ◽  
David Alais ◽  
Naotsugu Tsuchiya ◽  
Jeroen J.A. van Boxtel

AbstractThe attentional sampling hypothesis suggests that attention rhythmically enhances sensory processing when attending to a single (~8 Hz), or multiple (~4 Hz) objects. Here we investigated using binocular rivalry whether attention samples sensory representations that are not part of the conscious percept, during competition for perceptual dominance. When crossmodally cued toward a conscious image, subsequent changes in consciousness occurred at ~8 Hz, consistent with rates of undivided attentional sampling. However, when attention was cued toward the suppressed image, changes in consciousness slowed to ~3.5 Hz, indicating the division of attention away from the conscious visual image. In the electroencephalogram, we found that at 3.5 and 8 Hz, the strength of inter-trial phase coherence over fronto-temporal and parieto-occipital regions correlated with behavioral measures of changes in perception. When cues were not task-relevant, these effects disappeared, confirming that perceptual changes were dependent upon the allocation of attention, and that attention can flexibly sample away from a conscious image in a task-dependent manner.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document