scholarly journals Accelerometers Identify New Behaviors and Show Little Difference in the Activity Budgets of Lactating Northern Fur Seals (Callorhinus ursinus) between Breeding Islands and Foraging Habitats in the Eastern Bering Sea

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e0118761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. Battaile ◽  
Kentaro Q. Sakamoto ◽  
Chad A. Nordstrom ◽  
David A. S. Rosen ◽  
Andrew W. Trites
2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Diaz Gomez ◽  
David A.S. Rosen ◽  
Andrew W. Trites

Understanding whether northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus (L., 1758)) are negatively affected by changes in prey quality or diversity could provide insights into their on-going population decline in the central Bering Sea. We investigated how six captive female fur seals assimilated energy from eight different diets consisting of four prey species (walleye pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus Pallas, 1814, formerly Theragra chalcogrammus (Pallas, 1814)), Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii Valenciennes in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1847), capelin (Mallotus villosus (Müller, 1776)), and magister armhook squid (Berryteuthis magister (Berry, 1913))) fed alone or in combination. Net energy was quantified by measuring fecal energy loss, urinary energy loss, and heat increment of feeding. Digestible energy (95.9%–96.7%) was high (reflecting low fecal energy loss) and was negatively affected by ingested mass and dietary protein content. Urinary energy loss (9.3%–26.7%) increased significantly for high-protein diets. Heat increment of feeding (4.3%–12.4%) was significantly lower for high-lipid diets. Overall, net energy gain (57.9%–83.0%) was affected by lipid content and varied significantly across diets. Mixed-species diets did not provide any energetic benefit over single-species diets. Our study demonstrates that diet quality was more important in terms of energy gain than diet diversity. These findings suggest that fur seals consuming low-quality prey in the Bering Sea would be more challenged to obtain sufficient energy to satisfy energetic and metabolic demands, independent of high prey abundance.


2009 ◽  
Vol 242 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Antonelis ◽  
E. H. Sinclair ◽  
R. R. Ream ◽  
B. W. Robson

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 975
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W. Short ◽  
Harold J. Geiger ◽  
Lowell W. Fritz ◽  
Jonathan J. Warrenchuk

The Pribilof northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) herd in the eastern Bering Sea has declined by ~70% since the 1970s, for elusive reasons. Competition for pollock (Gadus chalcogramma) with the commercial fishery has been suspected as a contributing factor, but no correlative relationship between fishing activity and fur seal population declines has heretofore been demonstrated. Here, we present evidence for a moderately strong inverse relationship between fishery catches of pollock and first-year survival of fur seals, based on three different approaches to evaluation. We suspect this relationship results from the dependence of lactating female fur seals on locating dense and extensive schools of pollock near the Pribilof Islands to efficiently provide nutrition for their pups, because the pollock fishery also targets these same schools, and when fished, the remnants of these schools are fragmented and dispersed, making them more difficult for fur seals to locate and exploit. Inadequately fed pups are less likely to survive their initial independent residence at sea as they migrate south from the Pribilof Islands in the fall. Our results imply that pollock catches above ~1,000,000 t within ~300 km of the Pribilof Islands may continue to suppress first-year survival of Pribilof fur seals below the estimated equilibrium survival value of 0.50, leading to continued decline of the population.


Mammal Study ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukino Hirakawa ◽  
Takanori Horimoto ◽  
Ippei Suzuki ◽  
Yoko Mitani

1977 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALVIN W. SMITH ◽  
RICHARD J. BROWN ◽  
DOUGLAS E. SKILLING ◽  
H. L. BRAY ◽  
MARK C. KEYES

1957 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ford Wilke ◽  
Karl W. Kenyon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document