scholarly journals Clinical Utility and Limitations of Intraoperative Monitoring of Visual Evoked Potentials

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e0120525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeda Luo ◽  
Luca Regli ◽  
Oliver Bozinov ◽  
Johannes Sarnthein
PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e0133819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeda Luo ◽  
Luca Regli ◽  
Oliver Bozinov ◽  
Johannes Sarnthein

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 606-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinobu KAMIO ◽  
Naoto SAKAI ◽  
Tetsuro SAMESHIMA ◽  
Goro TAKAHASHI ◽  
Shinichiro KOIZUMI ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 429-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Wiedemayer ◽  
B. Fauser ◽  
I. E. Sandalcioglu ◽  
W. Armbruster ◽  
D. Stolke

Author(s):  
E. Gutzwiller ◽  
I. Cabrilo ◽  
I. Radovanovic ◽  
K. Schaller ◽  
C. Boëx

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. e204
Author(s):  
Maria del Mar Moreno-Galera ◽  
Vizmary Montes ◽  
Lidia Cabañes-Martinez ◽  
Laura López-Viñas ◽  
Jose Luis Boada Cuellar ◽  
...  

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farizeh Jashek-Ahmed ◽  
Ivan Cabrilo ◽  
Jarnail Bal ◽  
Brett Sanders ◽  
Joan Grieve ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Transsphenoidal surgery is the gold standard for pituitary adenoma resection. Although rare, a serious complication of surgery is worsened vision post-operatively. Objective To determine whether, in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma, intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials (VEP) is a safe, reproducible, and effective technological adjunct in predicting postoperative visual function. Methods The PubMed and OVID platforms were searched between January 1993 and December 2020 to identify publications that (1) featured patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma, (2) used intraoperative optic nerve monitoring with VEP and (3) reported on safety or effectiveness. Reference lists were cross-checked and expert opinion sought to identify further publications. Results Eleven studies were included comprising ten case series and one prospective cohort study. All employed techniques to improve reliability. No safety issues were reported. The only comparative study included described a statistically significant improvement in post-operative visual field testing when VEP monitoring was used. The remaining case-series varied in conclusion. In nine studies, surgical manipulation was halted in the event of a VEP amplitude decrease suggesting a widespread consensus that this is a warning sign of injury to the anterior optic apparatus. Conclusions Despite limited and low-quality published evidence regarding intra-operative VEP monitoring, our review suggests that it is a safe, reproducible, and increasingly effective technique of predicting postoperative visual deficits. Further studies specific to transsphenoidal surgery are required to determine its utility in protecting visual function in the resection of complex pituitary tumours.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document