scholarly journals Intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: a systematic review

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farizeh Jashek-Ahmed ◽  
Ivan Cabrilo ◽  
Jarnail Bal ◽  
Brett Sanders ◽  
Joan Grieve ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Transsphenoidal surgery is the gold standard for pituitary adenoma resection. Although rare, a serious complication of surgery is worsened vision post-operatively. Objective To determine whether, in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma, intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials (VEP) is a safe, reproducible, and effective technological adjunct in predicting postoperative visual function. Methods The PubMed and OVID platforms were searched between January 1993 and December 2020 to identify publications that (1) featured patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma, (2) used intraoperative optic nerve monitoring with VEP and (3) reported on safety or effectiveness. Reference lists were cross-checked and expert opinion sought to identify further publications. Results Eleven studies were included comprising ten case series and one prospective cohort study. All employed techniques to improve reliability. No safety issues were reported. The only comparative study included described a statistically significant improvement in post-operative visual field testing when VEP monitoring was used. The remaining case-series varied in conclusion. In nine studies, surgical manipulation was halted in the event of a VEP amplitude decrease suggesting a widespread consensus that this is a warning sign of injury to the anterior optic apparatus. Conclusions Despite limited and low-quality published evidence regarding intra-operative VEP monitoring, our review suggests that it is a safe, reproducible, and increasingly effective technique of predicting postoperative visual deficits. Further studies specific to transsphenoidal surgery are required to determine its utility in protecting visual function in the resection of complex pituitary tumours.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farizeh Ahmed ◽  
Ivan Cabrilo ◽  
Jarnail Bal ◽  
Brett Sanders ◽  
Joan Grieve ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundTranssphenoidal surgery is the gold standard for pituitary adenoma resection. Although rare, a serious complication of surgery is worsened vision post-operatively. ObjectiveTo determine whether, in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma, intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials (VEP) is a safe, reproducible and effective technological adjunct in predicting postoperative visual function. MethodsThe MEDLINE database was searched between January 1993 and June 2019 to identify publications that (1) featured patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma, (2) used intraoperative optic nerve monitoring with VEP and (3) reported on safety or effectiveness. Reference lists were cross-checked and expert opinion sought to identify further publications. ResultsTen studies were included comprising nine case series and one cohort study. All employed techniques to improve reliability. No safety issues were reported. The only comparative study included described a statistically significant improvement in post-operative visual field testing when VEP monitoring was used. The remaining case-series varied in conclusion. In nine studies, surgical manipulation was halted in the event of a VEP amplitude decrease suggesting a widespread consensus that this is a warning sign of injury to the anterior optic apparatus. ConclusionsDespite limited and low-quality published evidence regarding intra-operative VEP monitoring, our review suggests that it is a safe, reproducible and increasingly effective technique of predicting postoperative visual deficits. Further studies specific to transsphenoidal surgery are required to determine its utility in protecting visual function in the resection of complex pituitary tumours, and of other tumours in the anterior skull base.


2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 606-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinobu KAMIO ◽  
Naoto SAKAI ◽  
Tetsuro SAMESHIMA ◽  
Goro TAKAHASHI ◽  
Shinichiro KOIZUMI ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e0120525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeda Luo ◽  
Luca Regli ◽  
Oliver Bozinov ◽  
Johannes Sarnthein

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 429-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Wiedemayer ◽  
B. Fauser ◽  
I. E. Sandalcioglu ◽  
W. Armbruster ◽  
D. Stolke

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (5) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Артем Миронович ◽  
Artem Mironovich ◽  
Сергей Бояринов ◽  
Sergey Boyarinov

Diagnosis of causes of blindness in veterinary ophthalmology is an urgent issue. There are a large number of diseases of central and peripheral nervous system, which can lead to partial or complete loss of visual function in animals. Visual evoked potentials (VEP) of brain can be a reliable diagnostic research method to clarify the location of the disfunction and causes of blindness in dogs and cats. Together, the visual evoked potentials and electroretinography complement each other and give a greater idea of electrophysiology of visual process. In this article on the basis of large quantity of information we examine the ways of applying this method and the problems, connected with its use. It is important to understand that the VEP can reveal the functional disturbances of visual way, but does not give the information about the structural changes.


Author(s):  
E. Gutzwiller ◽  
I. Cabrilo ◽  
I. Radovanovic ◽  
K. Schaller ◽  
C. Boëx

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document