scholarly journals Fine-Scale Habitat Heterogeneity Influences Occupancy in Terrestrial Mammals in a Temperate Region of Australia

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e0138681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Stirnemann ◽  
Alessio Mortelliti ◽  
Philip Gibbons ◽  
David B. Lindenmayer
PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e0140802
Author(s):  
Ingrid Stirnemann ◽  
Alessio Mortelliti ◽  
Philip Gibbons ◽  
David B. Lindenmayer

2020 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica R. Grasty ◽  
Pamela G. Thompson ◽  
Elizabeth C. Hendrickson ◽  
Avery E. Pheil ◽  
Mitchell B. Cruzan

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Justin Cooper ◽  
William J McShea ◽  
David A Luther ◽  
Tavis Forrester

SummaryDeclining species richness is a global concern; however, the coarse-scale metrics used at regional or landscape levels might not accurately represent the important habitat characteristics needed to estimate species richness. Currently, there exists a lack of knowledge with regard to the spatial extent necessary to correlate remotely sensed habitat metrics to species richness and animal surveys. We provide a protocol for determining the best scale to use when merging remotely sensed habitat and animal survey data as a step towards improving estimates of vertebrate species richness on broad scales. We test the relative importance of fine-resolution habitat heterogeneity and productivity metrics at multiple spatial scales as predictors of species richness for birds, frogs and mammals using a Bayesian approach and a combination of passive monitoring technologies. Model performance was different for each taxonomic group and dependent on the scale at which habitat heterogeneity and productivity were measured. Optimal scales included a 20-m radius for bats and frogs, an 80-m radius for birds and a 180-m radius for terrestrial mammals. Our results indicate that optimal scales do exist when merging remotely sensed habitat measures with ground-based surveys, but they differ between vertebrate groups. Additionally, the selection of a measurement scale is highly influential to our understanding of the relationships between species richness and habitat characteristics.


Biotropica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duncan M. Kimuyu ◽  
David Kenfack ◽  
Paul M. Musili ◽  
Robert O. Ang’ila

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sacha Zahnd ◽  
Amaranta Fontcuberta ◽  
Mesut Koken ◽  
Aline Cardinaux ◽  
Michel Chapuisat

Abstract Background Social insects vary widely in social organization, yet the genetical and ecological factors influencing this variation remain poorly known. In particular, whether spatially varying selection influences the maintenance of social polymorphisms in ants has been rarely investigated. To fill this gap, we examined whether fine-scale habitat heterogeneity contributes to the co-existence of alternative forms of social organization within populations. Single-queen colonies (monogyne social form) are generally associated with better colonization abilities, whereas multiple-queen colonies (polygyne social form) are predicted to be better competitors and monopolize saturated habitats. We hypothesize that each social form colonizes and thrives in distinct local habitats, as a result of their alternative dispersal and colony founding strategies. Here, we test this hypothesis in the Alpine silver ant, in which a supergene controls polymorphic social organization. Results Monogyne and polygyne colonies predominate in distinct habitats of the same population. The analysis of 59 sampling plots distributed across six habitats revealed that single-queen colonies mostly occupy unconnected habitats that were most likely reached by flight. This includes young habitats isolated by water and old habitats isolated by vegetation. In contrast, multiple-queen colonies were abundant in young, continuous and saturated habitats. Hence, alternative social forms colonize and monopolize distinct niches at a very local scale. Conclusions Alternative social forms colonized and monopolized different local habitats, in accordance with differences in colonization and competition abilities. The monogyne social form displays a colonizer phenotype, by efficiently occupying empty habitats, while the polygyne social form exhibits a competitor phenotype, thriving in saturated habitats. The combination of the two phenotypes, coupled with fine-scale habitat heterogeneity, may allow the coexistence of alternative social forms within populations. Overall, these results suggest that spatially varying selection may be one of the mechanisms contributing to the maintenance of genetic polymorphisms in social organization.


Biotropica ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 694-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael F. Jorge ◽  
Pedro I. Simões ◽  
William E. Magnusson ◽  
Albertina P. Lima

2010 ◽  
Vol 136 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 69-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorna J. Cole ◽  
Meg L. Pollock ◽  
Duncan Robertson ◽  
John P. Holland ◽  
David I. McCracken ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document