scholarly journals Task-switching Cost and Intrinsic Functional Connectivity in the Human Brain: Toward Understanding Individual Differences in Cognitive Flexibility

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e0145826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shouhang Yin ◽  
Ting Wang ◽  
Weigang Pan ◽  
Yijun Liu ◽  
Antao Chen
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine G. Warthen ◽  
Robert C. Welsh ◽  
Benjamin Sanford ◽  
Vincent Koppelmans ◽  
Margit Burmeister ◽  
...  

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a neurotransmitter that has been implicated in the development of anxiety and mood disorders. Low levels of NPY have been associated with risk for these disorders, and high levels with resilience. Anxiety and depression are associated with altered intrinsic functional connectivity of brain networks, but the effect of NPY on functional connectivity is not known. Here, we test the hypothesis that individual differences in NPY expression affect resting functional connectivity of the default mode and salience networks. We evaluated static connectivity using graph theoretical techniques and dynamic connectivity with Leading Eigenvector Dynamics Analysis (LEiDA). To increase our power of detecting NPY effects, we genotyped 221 individuals and identified 29 healthy subjects at the extremes of genetically predicted NPY expression (12 high, 17 low). Static connectivity analysis revealed that lower levels of NPY were associated with shorter path lengths, higher global efficiency, higher clustering, higher small-worldness, and average higher node strength within the salience network, whereas subjects with high NPY expression displayed higher modularity and node eccentricity within the salience network. Dynamic connectivity analysis showed that the salience network of low-NPY subjects spent more time in a highly coordinated state relative to high-NPY subjects, and the salience network of high-NPY subjects switched between states more frequently. No group differences were found for static or dynamic connectivity of the default mode network. These findings suggest that genetically driven individual differences in NPY expression influence risk of mood and anxiety disorders by altering the intrinsic functional connectivity of the salience network.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (17) ◽  
pp. 4230-4242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Kucyi ◽  
Jessica Schrouff ◽  
Stephan Bickel ◽  
Brett L. Foster ◽  
James M. Shine ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 892-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaozheng Qin ◽  
Christina B. Young ◽  
Xujun Duan ◽  
Tianwen Chen ◽  
Kaustubh Supekar ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 176-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria N. Poole ◽  
Meghan E. Robinson ◽  
Omar Singleton ◽  
Joseph DeGutis ◽  
William P. Milberg ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 2385-2399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana J. N. Armbruster ◽  
Kai Ueltzhöffer ◽  
Ulrike Basten ◽  
Christian J. Fiebach

The pFC is critical for cognitive flexibility (i.e., our ability to flexibly adjust behavior to changing environmental demands), but also for cognitive stability (i.e., our ability to follow behavioral plans in the face of distraction). Behavioral research suggests that individuals differ in their cognitive flexibility and stability, and neurocomputational theories of working memory relate this variability to the concept of attractor stability in recurrently connected neural networks. We introduce a novel task paradigm to simultaneously assess flexible switching between task rules (cognitive flexibility) and task performance in the presence of irrelevant distractors (cognitive stability) and to furthermore assess the individual “spontaneous switching rate” in response to ambiguous stimuli to quantify the individual dispositional cognitive flexibility in a theoretically motivated way (i.e., as a proxy for attractor stability). Using fMRI in healthy human participants, a common network consisting of parietal and frontal areas was found for task switching and distractor inhibition. More flexible persons showed reduced activation and reduced functional coupling in frontal areas, including the inferior frontal junction, during task switching. Most importantly, the individual spontaneous switching rate antagonistically affected the functional coupling between inferior frontal junction and the superior frontal gyrus during task switching and distractor inhibition, respectively, indicating that individual differences in cognitive flexibility and stability are indeed related to a common prefrontal neural mechanism. We suggest that the concept of attractor stability of prefrontal working memory networks is a meaningful model for individual differences in cognitive stability versus flexibility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document