scholarly journals Training of clinical reasoning with a Serious Game versus small-group problem-based learning: A prospective study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. e0203851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angélina Middeke ◽  
Sven Anders ◽  
Madita Schuelper ◽  
Tobias Raupach ◽  
Nikolai Schuelper
F1000Research ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Dittus ◽  
Vanya Grover ◽  
Georgia Panagopoulos ◽  
Kenar Jhaveri

Background: Recent changes in healthcare delivery have necessitated residency education reform. To adapt to these changes, graduate medical education can adopt a chief resident-led clinical curriculum. Chief residents are ideal clinical instructors, as they are recent graduates who have excelled in their residency programs. To effectively use the limited time available for education, chief residents can implement active learning techniques. We present a chief resident-led, small-group, problem-based curriculum for teaching first-year internal medicine residents, and provide preliminary data supporting the efficacy of this approach.Methods: The seminar consisted of 11 4-week modules. Week 1 was a team-based crossword competition. Weeks 2-4 were small-group, problem-based clinical reasoning sessions taught by chief residents. The program was evaluated via pre- and post-module multiple-choice tests. Resident satisfaction data were collected via self-reported, anonymous surveys.Results: Preliminary results revealed a statistically significant increase from pre-test to post-test score for 9 of the 11 modules. The chest pain, fever, abdominal pain, shock, syncope, jaundice, dizziness, anemia, and acute kidney injury modules achieved statistical significance. Additionally, resident satisfaction surveys show that this teaching approach was an enjoyable experience for our residents.Discussion: Our chief seminar is an evidence-based, clinical reasoning approach for graduate medical education that uses active learning techniques. This is an effective and enjoyable method for educating internal medicine residents. Because of its reproducibility, it can be applied throughout residency education.


2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Schoenfeld-Tacher ◽  
Janice M. Bright ◽  
Sherry L. McConnell ◽  
Wanda S. Marley ◽  
Lori R. Kogan

Author(s):  
Susan Hawkins ◽  
Mark Hertweck ◽  
Anthony Goreczny ◽  
John Laird

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess changes in expectations and perceptions among physician assistant (PA) program matriculants regarding small group problem-based learning (PBL) from the beginning to the end of the first didactic year. Some of the stress experienced by students entering health science professional programs using PBL may be due to lack of awareness of the goals and norms of PBL which differ from those of traditional lecture-based curricula. A change in student expectations as a result of participation in PBL would indicate that these goals and norms can be learned through participation. Methods: The authors developed the PBL Readiness Questionnaire, a 71-item 10-point Likert scale regarding student expectations of the PBL experience regarding self, others and the facilitator. Questionnaire items were developed using data from a student survey as well as literature on characteristics associated with successful performance in a PBL setting. The questionnaire was administered to 60 PA students at the beginning of the first year fall semester and again at the end of the first year spring semester. Results: Analysis revealed a significant change from pre to posttest on total score as well as on the subscales of Expectations of Self and Expectations of Facilitators. The subscale of Expectations of Others approached significance. Conclusions: The change in Expectations of Facilitator may reflect the different role of facilitator vs. lecturer. Facilitators challenge physician assistant students with questions rather than providing information. The change in Expectations of Self could indicate that physician assistant students do not have accurate expectations of their own role in this type of group setting, and the experience of participating in PBL may positively affect their expectations. An area for future study would be a psychometric analysis of the questionnaire items in order to refine the tool and ascertain the reliability and validity of items and subscales.


1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 315-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
J W Tysinger ◽  
L K Klonis ◽  
J Z Sadler ◽  
J M Wagner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document