scholarly journals Differences in receipt of opioid agonist treatment and time to enter treatment for opioid use disorder among specialty addiction programs in the United States, 2014-17

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. e0226349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin C. Yang ◽  
Andres Roman-Urrestarazu ◽  
Carol Brayne
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Agonist ◽  
Opioid Agonist Treatment

scholarly journals Naltrexone Implant for Opioid Use Disorder

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-62
Author(s):  
Amber N. Edinoff ◽  
Catherine A. Nix ◽  
Claudia V. Orellana ◽  
Samantha M. StPierre ◽  
Erin A. Crane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Endogenous Opioids ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Agonist ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Health Related

The continued rise in the availability of illicit opioids and opioid-related deaths in the United States has left physicians, researchers, and lawmakers desperate for solutions to this ongoing epidemic. The research into therapeutic options for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) began with the introduction of methadone in the 1960s. The approval of oral naltrexone initially showed much promise, as the drug was observed to be highly potent in antagonizing the effects of opioids while producing no opioid agonist effects of its own and having a favorable side effect profile. Patients that routinely take their naltrexone reported fewer days of heroin use and had more negative drug tests than those without treatment. Poor outcomes in OUD patients treated with naltrexone have been directly tied to short treatment time. Studies have shown that naltrexone given orally vs. as an implant at the 6-month interval showed a higher non-compliance rate among those who used oral medications at the 6-month mark and a slower return to use rate. There were concerns that naltrexone could possibly worsen negative symptoms seen in opiate use disorder related to blockade of endogenous opioids that are important for pleasurable stimuli. Studies have shown that naltrexone demonstrated no increase in levels of anxiety, depression and anhedonia in participants and another study found that those treated with naltrexone had a significant reduction in mental health-related hospitalizations. The latter study also concluded that there was no increased risk for mental health-related incidents in patients taking naltrexone via a long-acting implant. Although not yet FDA approved in the United States, naltrexone implant has shown promising results in Europe and Australia and may provide a novel treatment option for opioid addiction.

Buprenorphine for opioid dependence

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 286-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reisel Berger
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Opioid Dependence ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Agonist ◽  
Mu Opioid ◽  
Product Availability ◽  
Dosing Strategy

Opioid use disorder is a growing problem in the United States that can have devastating consequences on affected individuals. Buprenorphine is a partial mu-opioid agonist that can be used in the treatment of opioid dependence. In this article, the pharmacology of buprenorphine is discussed as is the dosing strategy. Formulations and product availability are mentioned and assessed. Several studies comparing the use of buprenorphine to methadone for opioid dependence are briefly reviewed.

scholarly journals Methadone Distribution Trends from 2017-2019 in the United States

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Furst ◽  
Nicholas J. Mynarski ◽  
Kenneth L. McCall ◽  
Brian J. Piper
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Distribution Patterns ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Treatment Programs ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Drug Enforcement ◽  
The Us

AbstractObjectiveMethadone is an evidence based treatment for opioid use disorder and is also employed for acute pain. The primary objective of this study was to explore methadone distribution patterns between the years 2017 and 2019 across the United States (US). This study builds upon previous literature that has analyzed prior years of US distribution patterns, and further outlines regional and state specific methadone trends.MethodsThe Drug Enforcement Administration’s Automated Reports and Consolidated Ordering System (ARCOS) was used to acquire the number of narcotic treatment programs (NTPs) per state and methadone distribution weight in grams. Methadone distribution by weight, corrected for state populations, and number of NTPs were compared from 2017 to 2019 between states, within regions, and nationally.ResultsBetween 2017 and 2019, the national distribution of methadone increased 12.30% for NTPs but decreased 34.57% for pain, for a total increase of 2.66%. While all states saw a decrease in distribution for pain, when compared regionally, the Northeast showed a significantly smaller decrease than all other regions. Additionally, the majority of states experienced an increase in distribution for NTPs and most states demonstrated a relatively stable or increasing number of NTPs, with an 11.49% increase in NTPs nationally. The number of NTPs per 100K in 2019 ranged from 2.08 in Rhode Island to 0.00 in Wyoming.ConclusionAlthough methadone distribution for OUD was increasing in the US, there were pronounced regional disparities.

Multi-site intervention to improve emergency department care for patients who live with opioid use disorder: A quantitative evaluation

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 784-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick McLane ◽  
Ken Scott ◽  
Zainab Suleman ◽  
Karen Yee ◽  
Brian R. Holroyd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Agonist ◽  
Emergency Department Care ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Opioid Agonist Treatment ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Disorder Treatment

ABSTRACTBackgroundOpioid use disorder is a major public health crisis, and evidence suggests ways of better serving patients who live with opioid use disorder in the emergency department (ED). A multi-disciplinary team developed a quality improvement project to implement this evidence.MethodsThe intervention was developed by an expert working group consisting of specialists and stakeholders. The group set goals of increasing prescribing of buprenorphine/naloxone and providing next day walk-in referrals to opioid use disorder treatment clinics. From May to September 2018, three Alberta ED sites and three opioid use disorder treatment clinics worked together to trial the intervention. We used administrative data to track the number of ED visits where patients were given buprenorphine/naloxone. Monthly ED prescribing rates before and after the intervention were considered and compared with eight nonintervention sites. We considered whether patients continued to fill opioid agonist treatment prescriptions at 30, 60, and 90 days after their index ED visit to measure continuity in treatment.ResultsThe intervention sites increased their prescribing of buprenorphine/naloxone during the intervention period and prescribed more buprenorphine/naloxone than the controls. Thirty-five of 47 patients (74.4%) discharged from the ED with buprenorphine/naloxone continued to fill opioid agonist treatment prescriptions 30 days and 60 days after their index ED visit. Thirty-four patients (72.3%) filled prescriptions at 90 days.ConclusionsEmergency clinicians can effectively initiate patients on buprenorphine/naloxone when supports for this standardized evidence-based care are in place within their practice setting and timely follow-up in community is available.

The Opioid Crisis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Aryana Bryan ◽  
Valerie Hruschak ◽  
Cory Dennis ◽  
Daniel Rosen ◽  
Gerald Cochran
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Social Work ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Work Practice ◽  
The United States ◽  
Social Work Practice ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Prescription Opioid ◽  
Opioid Use

Opioid-related deaths by overdoses quadrupled in the United States from the years 1999 to 2015. This rise in mortality predominately occurred in the wake of historic changes in pain management practices and aggressive marketing of opioid medications such as oxycontin. Prescription opioid misuse and subsequent addiction spilled over to heroin and fentanyl for many. This drug epidemic differed from others in its impact among non-Hispanic whites, leading to drastic changes in how the United States views addiction and chooses to respond. This article offers an overview of opioid use disorder (OUD), its treatment and its relationship with pain. It also discusses special populations affected and provides insight into future directions for research and social work practice surrounding opioid management in the United States. Because of the profession’s emphasis on the person and social environment as well as its focus on vulnerable and oppressed populations, social work plays a critical role in addressing the crisis.

scholarly journals Opioid agonist treatment and fatal overdose risk in a state‐wide US population receiving opioid use disorder services

Addiction ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 115 (9) ◽  
pp. 1683-1694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noa Krawczyk ◽  
Ramin Mojtabai ◽  
Elizabeth A. Stuart ◽  
Michael Fingerhood ◽  
Deborah Agus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Agonist ◽  
Opioid Agonist Treatment ◽  
Fatal Overdose
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document