scholarly journals Proposed Serum Cholesterol Reference Measurement Procedure by Gas Chromatography–Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry

2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 614-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selvin H Edwards ◽  
Mary M Kimberly ◽  
Susan D Pyatt ◽  
Shelton L Stribling ◽  
Kara D Dobbin ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Our purpose was to establish a mass spectrometry reference measurement procedure (RMP) for cholesterol to use in the CDC's standardization programs. We explored a gas chromatography–isotope dilution mass spectrometry (GC-IDMS) procedure using a multilevel standard calibration curve to quantify samples with varying cholesterol concentrations. METHODS We calibrated the mass spectrometry instrument by isotope dilution with a pure primary standard reference material and an isotopically enriched cholesterol analog as the internal standard (IS). We diluted the serum samples with Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4, 0.05 mol/L, 0.25% Triton X-100) before analysis. We used 17 serum pools, 10 native samples, and 2 standard reference materials (SRMs). We compared the GC-IDMS measurements with the CDC's modified Abell–Levy–Brodie–Kendall (AK) RMP measurements and assessed method accuracy by analyzing 2 SRMs. We evaluated the procedure for lack of interference by analyzing serum spiked with a mixture of 7 sterols. RESULTS The mean percent bias between the AK and the GC-IDMS RMP was 1.6% for all samples examined. The mean percent bias from NIST's RMP was 0.5% for the SRMs. The total %CVs for SRM 1951b levels I and II were 0.61 and 0.73%, respectively. We found that none of the sterols investigated interfered with the cholesterol measurement. CONCLUSIONS The low imprecision, linear response, lack of interferences, and acceptable bias vs the NIST primary RMP qualifies this procedure as an RMP for determining serum cholesterol. The CDC will adopt and implement this GC-IDMS procedure for cholesterol standardization.

1999 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 1523-1529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Kessler ◽  
Lothar Siekmann

Abstract Background: A reference measurement procedure is needed to demonstrate the traceability of results of urea measurements in human serum. We developed a measurement procedure using the principle of isotope dilution gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Methods: [13C,15N2]Urea as internal standard was added to a serum sample and equilibrated with endogenous nonlabeled urea. For the preparation of calibrators, the same amount of labeled urea was mixed with known amounts of nonlabeled urea. The serum samples were treated with ethanol to remove proteins by precipitation. The labeled and nonlabeled urea of the samples was converted into a trimethylsilyl derivative of 2-hydroxypyrimidine. The gas chromatography/mass spectrometry system was adjusted to monitor m/z 153 and 168 for the nonlabeled urea derivative and m/z 156 and 171 for the isotopically labeled analogs. The results of the determination were calculated from peak ratios by a hyperbolic calculation function based on the theory of isotope dilution analysis. Results: The procedure was applied to control samples and patient samples and evaluated with respect to its trueness and precision. The standard uncertainty of the results was 0.47–1.72%. Conclusions:This reference measurement procedure allows values to be assigned to controls and calibrators that are traceable to the primary urea reference material of NIST and, therefore, to the Système International unit “mole” with a low degree of uncertainty. This procedure provides a tool for the highly accurate determination of urea in control materials as well as in patient sera.


2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 2101-2110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katleen Van Uytfanghe ◽  
Dietmar Stöckl ◽  
Jean M Kaufman ◽  
Tom Fiers ◽  
H Alec Ross ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To assess the analytical validity of free testosterone (FTe) measurements, a reference measurement procedure (RMP) is required. For steroids, isotope dilution–mass spectrometry is accepted as state-of-the-art technology. Because FTe is defined as the hormone fraction in serum water in equilibrium with the protein-bound fraction, the RMP should include a physical separation step. The use of equilibrium dialysis (ED) or ultrafiltration (UF) is advocated. Our objective was to develop such a candidate RMP. Methods: We selected UF combined with isotope dilution–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (ID-GC/MS) for direct measurement of Te in the ultrafiltrate. After optimization of the UF process, the complete procedure was validated by use of split-sample comparisons with indirect ED (iED) and symmetric dialysis (SyD). Results: The candidate RMP gave maximum within-day, between-day, and total CVs of 3.0%, 3.1%, and 4.3%. The Deming regression equations for the respective method comparisons were: UF-ID-GC/MS = 0.98(iED) − 53 pmol/L (r = 0.94; Sy|x= 42 pmol/L) and UF-ID-GC/MS = 0.92(SyD) + 21 pmol/L (r = 0.97; Sy|x= 31 pmol/L). Conclusions: We achieved the objective of a state-of-the-art candidate RMP, which agreed well with iED and SyD. However, we also demonstrated that a degree of discordance remains, which may require a decision from an authoritative organization on the recommended procedure to measure free hormone concentrations.


2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 750-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Kaiser ◽  
Theodorus Akerboom ◽  
Rüdiger Ohlendorf ◽  
Hans Reinauer

Abstract Background: Standardization of hemoglobin (Hb)A1c measurements is a process of considerable interest for quality assurance in diabetes management. To contribute to continuous quality improvement and fulfillment of the requirements for reference measurement procedures according to the standards of the International Organization for Standardization, we developed a calibration system of highest metrological order using isotope dilution–mass spectrometry with a reference material. Method: Samples were prepared by enzymatic cleavage based on the IFCC reference measurement procedure for LC-MS analysis. After digestion the samples were spiked with [D7]-labeled glycated and nonglycated hexapeptides as internal standards for quantification. LC-MS analysis was performed by using a C12 reversed-phase column and a gradient of acetonitrile/H2O containing 0.1% formic acid. Results: Calibration systems for HbA1c determination based on liquid chromatography–isotope dilution–mass spectrometry (LC-ID-MS) and on the IFCC reference measurement procedure were compared. A linear regression analysis demonstrated a correlation of r2 = 1.00 between the 2 different calibration systems. Mean deviation was 5.5% for the calibration and 3.3% for hemolysate samples, with a mean expanded uncertainty of 4.9%. Conclusions: This LC-ID-MS procedure allows the current IFCC reference measurement procedure for HbA1c to be raised to a higher order of accuracy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document