scholarly journals Islet Autoantibody Standardization Program 2018 Workshop: Interlaboratory Comparison of Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Autoantibody Assay Performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 1141-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vito Lampasona ◽  
David L Pittman ◽  
Alistair J Williams ◽  
Peter Achenbach ◽  
Michael Schlosser ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND The Islet Autoantibody Standardization Program (IASP) aims to improve the performance of immunoassays measuring type 1 diabetes (T1D)-associated autoantibodies and the concordance of results among laboratories. IASP organizes international interlaboratory assay comparison studies in which blinded serum samples are distributed to participating laboratories, followed by centralized collection and analysis of results, providing participants with an unbiased comparative assessment. In this report, we describe the results of glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody (GADA) assays presented in the IASP 2018 workshop. METHODS In May 2018, IASP distributed to participants uniquely coded sera from 43 new-onset T1D patients, 7 multiple autoantibody-positive nondiabetic individuals, and 90 blood donors. Results were analyzed for the following metrics: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC), partial ROC-AUC at 95% specificity (pAUC95), and concordance of qualitative and quantitative results. RESULTS Thirty-seven laboratories submitted results from a total of 48 different GADA assays adopting 9 different formats. The median ROC-AUC and pAUC95 of all assays were 0.87 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.83–0.89] and 0.036 (IQR, 0.032–0.039), respectively. Large differences in pAUC95 (range, 0.001–0.0411) were observed across assays. Of formats widely adopted, bridge ELISAs showed the best median pAUC95 (0.039; range, 0.036–0.041). CONCLUSIONS Several novel assay formats submitted to this study showed heterogeneous performance. In 2018, the majority of the best performing GADA immunoassays consisted of novel or established nonradioactive tests that proved on a par or superior to the radiobinding assay, the previous gold standard assay format for GADA measurement.

Endocrine ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 286-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yorihiro Iwasaki ◽  
Yoshiyuki Hamamoto ◽  
Yukiko Kawasaki ◽  
Hiroki Ikeda ◽  
Sachiko Honjo ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Souhel Najjar ◽  
Daniel Pearlman ◽  
David Zagzag ◽  
John Golfinos ◽  
Orrin Devinsky

2003 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 908-915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matti Ankelo ◽  
Annette Westerlund-Karlsson ◽  
Jorma Ilonen ◽  
Mikael Knip ◽  
Kaisa Savola ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Type 1 diabetes mellitus results from destruction of the pancreatic insulin-producing beta cells by a chronic autoimmune process. Methods are needed for the detection of circulating autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65), a major marker of this process. Methods: Streptavidin-coated microtiter plates were incubated with biotinylated GAD65, and after incubation with serum samples from patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and control individuals, europium-labeled GAD65 was added. After washing steps, the delayed fluorescence was measured in duplicate in a fluorometer. Samples collected from 100 patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus and 100 healthy controls were measured by the new assay and by a radiobinding assay. Results: The detection limit of the new assay was 1.49 WHO units/mL, the calibration curve was linear to 4 140 WHO units/mL, and no hook effect was observed up to 41 400 WHO units/mL. The intraassay CV was 2.1–6.3% over the calibration range. For patient serum samples, the intraassay, interassay, and total CVs were 5.4–7.0%, 9.8–13%, and 12–14%, respectively. Compared with conventional radioimmunologic methods, the analytical range was broader and the analysis time required to perform the measurements was shorter. At a cutoff with 99% specificity, the new assay and the radiobinding assay were positive in 71 and 67 patients, respectively. Conclusions: The new assay provides a rapid and sensitive nonradioactive method applicable for large-scale screening for beta-cell autoimmunity. It has a broad linear analytical range, is easy to perform and automate, and has sensitivity and specificity comparable to those for the conventional radioisotope assay.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document