Access To Cancer Drugs In Medicare Part D: Formulary Placement And Beneficiary Cost Sharing In 2006

2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1240-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Bowman ◽  
Amy Rousseau ◽  
David Silk ◽  
Catherine Harrison
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeah Jung ◽  
Roger D. Feldman ◽  
Marshall McBean

Abstract Specialty drugs can bring substantial benefits to patients with debilitating conditions, such as cancer, but their costs are very high. Insurers/payers have increased patient cost-sharing for specialty drugs to manage specialty drug spending. We utilized Medicare Part D plan formulary data to create the initial price (cost-sharing in the initial coverage phase in Part D), and estimated the total demand (both on- and off-label uses) for specialty cancer drugs among elderly Medicare Part D enrollees with no low-income subsidies (non-LIS) as a function of the initial price. We corrected for potential endogeneity associated with plan choice by instrumenting the initial price of specialty cancer drugs with the initial prices of specialty drugs in unrelated classes. We report three findings. First, we found that elderly non-LIS beneficiaries with cancer were less likely to use a Part D specialty cancer drug when the initial price was high: the overall price elasticity of specialty cancer drug spending ranged between −0.72 and −0.75. Second, the price effect in Part D specialty cancer drug use was not significant among newly diagnosed patients. Finally, we found that use of Part B-covered cancer drugs was not responsive to the Part D specialty cancer drug price. As the demand for costly specialty drugs grows, it will be important to identify clinical circumstances where specialty drugs can be valuable and ensure access to high-value treatments.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-182
Author(s):  
V. Fung ◽  
M. Price ◽  
A. Busch ◽  
W. Dow ◽  
B. Fireman ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e190-e198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy J. Davidoff ◽  
Franklin B. Hendrick ◽  
Amer M. Zeidan ◽  
Maria R. Baer ◽  
Bruce C. Stuart ◽  
...  

Improved coordination between Part B and D benefits regarding issues of home injection of medications may create incentives that improve patient access and convenience.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. 1164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhruv S. Kazi ◽  
Christine Y. Lu ◽  
Grace A. Lin ◽  
Colette DeJong ◽  
R. Adams Dudley ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 122-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liran Einav ◽  
Amy Finkelstein ◽  
Maria Polyakova

We explore how private drug plans set cost sharing in the context of Medicare Part D. While publicly provided drug coverage typically involves uniform cost sharing across drugs, we document substantial heterogeneity in the cost sharing for different drugs within privately provided plans. We also document that private plans systematically set higher consumer cost sharing for drugs or classes associated with more elastic demand; to do so, we estimate price elasticities of demand across more than 150 drugs and across more than 100 therapeutic classes. We conclude by discussing the various channels that likely affect private plans’ cost-sharing decisions. (JEL G22, H51, I13, I18, L11, L65)


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 956-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haesuk Park ◽  
Karen L. Rascati ◽  
Kenneth A. Lawson ◽  
Jamie C. Barner ◽  
Kristin M. Richards ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document