The Evolving Regulatory Environment and Bedside Metabolic Monitoring of the Acute Care Patient

CHEST Journal ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 191S-197S ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Baer ◽  
Richard E. Belsey
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (e1) ◽  
pp. e9-e17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A Collins ◽  
Ronen Rozenblum ◽  
Wai Yin Leung ◽  
Constance RC Morrison ◽  
Diana L Stade ◽  
...  

Objective: To describe current practices and stakeholder perspectives of patient portals in the acute care setting. We aimed to: (1) identify key features, (2) recognize challenges, (3) understand current practices for design, configuration, and use, and (4) propose new directions for investigation and innovation. Materials and Methods: Mixed methods including surveys, interviews, focus groups, and site visits with stakeholders at leading academic medical centers. Thematic analyses to inform development of an explanatory model and recommendations. Results: Site surveys were administered to 5 institutions. Thirty interviews/focus groups were conducted at 4 site visits that included a total of 84 participants. Ten themes regarding content and functionality, engagement and culture, and access and security were identified, from which an explanatory model of current practices was developed. Key features included clinical data, messaging, glossary, patient education, patient personalization and family engagement tools, and tiered displays. Four actionable recommendations were identified by group consensus. Discussion: Design, development, and implementation of acute care patient portals should consider: (1) providing a single integrated experience across care settings, (2) humanizing the patient-clinician relationship via personalization tools, (3) providing equitable access, and (4) creating a clear organizational mission and strategy to achieve outcomes of interest. Conclusion: Portals should provide a single integrated experience across the inpatient and ambulatory settings. Core functionality includes tools that facilitate communication, personalize the patient, and deliver education to advance safe, coordinated, and dignified patient-centered care. Our findings can be used to inform a “road map” for future work related to acute care patient portals.


10.2196/13336 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. e13336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumiko O Schnock ◽  
Julia E Snyder ◽  
Theresa E Fuller ◽  
Megan Duckworth ◽  
Maxwell Grant ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
pp. 212-238
Author(s):  
Cassandra Stroup ◽  
Julie Benz ◽  
Shelene Thomas ◽  
Kathleen Whalen

This chapter addresses the innovative solutions implemented by faculty members at Regis University to pivot simulation experiences to a virtual platform during a global pandemic. Healthcare faculty ensured nursing and pharmacy students actively engaged in content and with one another without sacrificing the necessary interprofessional knowledge. The authors adapted a previously in-person acute care simulation to a virtual platform by utilizing technology and specific, intentional pre-simulation, during simulation, and post-stimulation knowledge checks. By following the standards for interprofessional, nursing, and pharmacy education, the authors were able to execute this simulation and implement meaningful feedback for continued advancement for future students. The continued goal of the simulation will be to provide students with high-stress, low-occurrence acute care patient experiences while working closely with other members of the healthcare team to enable students to experience required, necessary curriculum before graduation and working on the frontlines of healthcare.


2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 903-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy M. Treakle ◽  
Maureen Schultz ◽  
George P. Giannakos ◽  
Patrick C. Joyce ◽  
Fred M. Gordin

Objective.To analyze a decade of hospital staff and student exposures to blood and body fluids (BBF) and to identify risk factors relevant to prevention strategies.Design.Retrospective review of a 1999–2008 data set of BBF exposures. The data, maintained by occupational health staff, detailed the type of exposure, the setting in which the exposure occurred, and the occupational group of the BBF-exposed personnel.Setting.Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VA-DC), an inner-city tertiary care hospital.Participants.All healthcare workers and staff at the VA-DC.Methods.Review of database.Results.A review of 10 years of data revealed 564 occupational exposures to BBF, of which 66% were caused by needlesticks and 20% were caused by sharp objects. Exposures occurred most often in the acute care setting (which accounted for 39% of exposures) and the operating room (which accounted for 22%). There was a mean of 4.9 exposures per 10,000 acute care patient-days, 0.5 exposures per 10,000 long-term care patient-days, and 0.35 exposures per 10,000 outpatient visits. Housestaff accounted for the highest number of all exposures (196 [35%]). There were, on average, 15.2 exposures per 100 housestaff full-time equivalents. An average of only 1 exposure per year occurred in the hemodialysis center.Conclusions.Occupational exposures to BBF remain common, but rates vary widely by setting and occupational group. Overall rates are steady across a decade, despite the use of various antiexposure devices and provider education programs. Targeting occupational groups and hospital settings that have been shown to have the highest risk rates should become foundational to future preventative strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document