scholarly journals Implementing the European Sports Leadership Programme: A vehicle to help development graduate workplace competencies

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie A. Brunton ◽  
Francisco José Cánovas-Alvarez ◽  
Lourdes Meroño ◽  
Alejandro Leiva-Arcas ◽  
José L. Arias-Estero ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Inga Minelgaite ◽  
Svala Guðmundsdóttir ◽  
Árelía E. Guðmundsdóttir ◽  
Olga Stangej
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. e12315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulriikka Savela-Huovinen ◽  
Hanni Muukkonen ◽  
Auli Toom

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob Guardiola ◽  
Larry Hanneman ◽  
Steven Mickelson ◽  
Thomas Brumm

Author(s):  
Michael Healy

Providers, industry, and governments have embraced microcredentialing as a solution to the volatility and velocity of changes in labour markets, workplace competencies, and the needs of the 21st century lifelong learner (Oliver, 2019). However, microcredentials do not, in and of themselves, guarantee career or employment success. Seeking a microcredential is one adaptive career behaviour that people might enact in pursuit of their career goals (Lent & Brown, 2013). Similarly, holding a microcredential is one form of employability capital that people might highlight when seeking employment (Tomlinson & Anderson, 2020).


2020 ◽  
pp. 101269022091184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam B Evans ◽  
Gertrud U Pfister

Gender inequity in sport organisation boards, particularly in decision-making positions, remains a significant issue. Considerable research exists on the topic yet attempts to integrate non-academic perspectives on this literature are relatively limited. We present a systematic narrative review, constructed in conjunction with the work of a ‘reflective panel’ which included sport, business and academic professionals from Europe and North America. The panel helped to inform the search strategy and reflected upon the narrative produced. In total, 154 peer-reviewed articles, book chapters and grey literature publications were included. The resultant narrative is presented according to several scales of abstraction; macro-scale studies of global/national trends; meso-scale studies of processes (re)producing gender inequity; and microscopic studies of lived experiences of gender inequity. There is consensus in the literature that, globally, women continue to be under-represented in leadership positions. Patriarchal selection practices and organisational cultures reinforce this inequity, despite evidence that men in leadership roles recognise the problem. While gender equity policies exist, actions to pursue gender equity are more limited. Patriarchal language, gendered stereotypes and person-profiling still persist, resulting in specific emotional and practical challenges for women in sports leadership positions. The reflective panel recognised an over-representation of studies from a liberal ‘Western’ tradition that conceptualises gender inequity in a specific socio-cultural and political way. Studies also often overlook the effects of the intersectionality. Finally, we suggest areas for further research, including a need to understand the electoral procedures of sports organisations beyond ‘formal’ channels, to better understand women’s lived experiences of inequity and to investigate the experiences of women who either step down or are not appointed to leadership positions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document