scholarly journals Forest structure indicators based on tree size inequality and their relationships to airborne laser scanning

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (205) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén Valbuena

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (sup1) ◽  
pp. S18-S31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén Valbuena ◽  
Matti Maltamo ◽  
Susana Martín-Fernández ◽  
Petteri Packalen ◽  
Cristina Pascual ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 433 ◽  
pp. 111-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Adnan ◽  
Matti Maltamo ◽  
David A. Coomes ◽  
Antonio García-Abril ◽  
Yadvinder Malhi ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
P. Crespo-Peremarch ◽  
L. A. Ruiz

<p class="Bodytext">This PhD thesis addresses the development of full-waveform airborne laser scanning (ALS<sub>FW</sub>) processing and analysis methods to characterize the vertical forest structure, in particular the understory vegetation. In this sense, the influence of several factors such as pulse density, voxel parameters (voxel size and assignation value), scan angle at acquisition, radiometric correction and regression methods is analyzed on the extraction of ALS<sub>FW</sub> metric values and on the estimate of forest attributes. Additionally, a new software tool to process ALS<sub>FW</sub> data is presented, which includes new metrics related to understory vegetation. On the other hand, occlusion caused by vegetation in the ALS<sub>FW</sub>, discrete airborne laser scanning (ALS<sub>D</sub>) and terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) signal is characterized along the vertical structure. Finally, understory vegetation density is detected and determined by ALS<sub>FW</sub> data, as well as characterized by using the new proposed metrics.</p>



2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1854
Author(s):  
Dominik Seidel ◽  
Peter Annighöfer ◽  
Martin Ehbrecht ◽  
Paul Magdon ◽  
Stephan Wöllauer ◽  
...  

The three-dimensional forest structure is an important driver of several ecosystem functions and services. Recent advancements in laser scanning technologies have set the path to measuring structural complexity directly from 3D point clouds. Here, we show that the box-dimension (Db) from fractal analysis, a measure of structural complexity, can be obtained from airborne laser scanning data. Based on 66 plots across different forest types in Germany, each 1 ha in size, we tested the performance of the Db by evaluating it against conventional ground-based measures of forest structure and commonly used stand characteristics. We found that the Db was related (0.34 < R < 0.51) to stand age, management intensity, microclimatic stability, and several measures characterizing the overall stand structural complexity. For the basal area, we could not find a significant relationship, indicating that structural complexity is not tied to the basal area of a forest. We also showed that Db derived from airborne data holds the potential to distinguish forest types, management types, and the developmental phases of forests. We conclude that the box-dimension is a promising measure to describe the structural complexity of forests in an ecologically meaningful way.





2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 583-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jussi Peuhkurinen ◽  
Lauri Mehtätalo ◽  
Matti Maltamo

Airborne laser scanning based forest inventories employ two major methods: individual tree detection (ITD) and the area-based statistical approach (ABSA). ITD is based on the assumption that trees are of a certain form and can be delineated using airborne laser scanning techniques, whereas ABSA is an empirical method based on the relations between area-level forest attributes and laser echo height distributions. These two methods are compared here within the same test area in terms of their usefulness for estimating mean forest stand characteristics and tree size distributions. All evaluations were performed using leave-one-out cross validation. The average errors in volume and basal area did not differ significantly between the methods. ABSA resulted in overall better accuracies when estimating the diameter and height of the basal area median tree and the number of stems, whereas ITD produced significantly biased estimates for the number of stems and the mean tree size. Tree size distributions were estimated with slightly better accuracy using ABSA. More comprehensive investigations revealed that both methods were not able to estimate forest structure (tree size distribution and spatial distribution of tree locations), which in turn, affected the estimation accuracies.



2016 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 346-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas C. Coops ◽  
Piotr Tompaski ◽  
Wiebe Nijland ◽  
Gregory J.M. Rickbeil ◽  
Scott E. Nielsen ◽  
...  




Author(s):  
Francesca Bottalico ◽  
Gherardo Chirici ◽  
Raffaello Giannini ◽  
Salvatore Mele ◽  
Matteo Mura ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document