scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN MIDLINE INCISION OVER PARAMEDIAN INCISION IN CASES OF LAPAROTOMY

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (72) ◽  
pp. 15226-15229
Author(s):  
Suresh Karlatti ◽  
Uma R B
2021 ◽  
pp. 50-50
Author(s):  
Rajeev Ranjan Kumar ◽  
Raj Shekhar

Prospective randomized controlled study was conducted between October,2015 and September,2017 evaluating midline incision and paramedian incision in case of emergency laparotomies. A total of 60 cases were randomized into two groups of 30 each. Time taken for midline incision opening and closing was less 9.86 min as compared to paramedian incision is 19.08 min. This is due to opening and closure of abdomen in layered manner in paramedian incision. Three cases of burst abdomen were reported in midline incision as compared to one case in paramedian incision. Cases having previous abdominal scar were excluded from the present study. 4 cases of incisional hernia were reported in case of midline incision as compared to one case in paramedian incision.


2002 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. A. Burger ◽  
M. van't Riet ◽  
J. Jeekel

Background and Aims: The choice of incision for laparotomy depends on the area that needs to be exposed, the elective or emergency nature of the operation and personal preference. Type of incision may however have its influence on the occurrence of postoperative wound complications. Techniques and features of various incisions are discussed, as well as the incidence of their postoperative complications. Method: A medline search was conducted identifying prospective randomised trials, as well as retrospective studies with sufficient follow-up, comparing midline, paramedian, transverse and oblique incisions. Results: Significant differences in wound infection and wound dehiscence rates were not reported. Transverse, oblique and paramedian incisions caused significantly less incisional hernias than midline incisions. However, trials comparing transverse and midline incisions for larger laparotomies did not show significant differences. All four trials comparing lateral paramedian with midline incisions reported incisional hernia rates of 0 % after the lateral paramedian incision. Differences with the midline incision were significant. Conclusion: Transverse or oblique incisions should be preferred for small unilateral operations. The paramedian incision should be used for major elective laparotomies. The use of the midline incision should be restricted to operations in which unlimited access to the abdominal cavity is useful or necessary.


2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Hughes ◽  
Niazy M. Selim

Incisional hernia is a potential complication of all abdominal incisions and still remains a significant problem financially and medically. Presently, there is a lack of general consensus among surgeons in regard to the optimal treatment. The midline incision is the most common used abdominal incision and it carries a high incidence of incisional hernia (up to 15%). The paramedian incision was known to lead to a small incidence of incisional hernias. This discussion is meant to bring the paramedian incision back to the picture as a hope to decrease the incidence of incisional hernia.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Oliveira Ferreira de Souza ◽  
Éve‐Marie Frigon ◽  
Robert Tremblay‐Laliberté ◽  
Christian Casanova ◽  
Denis Boire

Author(s):  
M. O. Magnusson ◽  
D. G. Osborne ◽  
T. Shimoji ◽  
W. S. Kiser ◽  
W. A. Hawk

Short term experimental and clinical preservation of kidneys is presently best accomplished by hypothermic continuous pulsatile perfusion with cryoprecipitated and millipore filtered plasma. This study was undertaken to observe ultrastructural changes occurring during 24-hour preservation using the above mentioned method.A kidney was removed through a midline incision from healthy mongrel dogs under pentobarbital anesthesia. The kidneys were flushed immediately after removal with chilled electrolyte solution and placed on a LI-400 preservation system and perfused at 8-10°C. Serial kidney biopsies were obtained at 0-½-1-2-4-8-16 and 24 hours of preservation. All biopsies were prepared for electron microscopy. At the end of the preservation period the kidneys were autografted.


2001 ◽  
Vol 268 (6) ◽  
pp. 1739-1748
Author(s):  
Aitor Hierro ◽  
Jesus M. Arizmendi ◽  
Javier De Las Rivas ◽  
M. Angeles Urbaneja ◽  
Adelina Prado ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document