scholarly journals S0628 Can Endoscopy Wait? The Diagnostic Test Performance of Clinical History in Diagnosing Diverticular Bleed Among Patients Without High Risk Features

2020 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. S315-S315
Author(s):  
Fariah Ahmad ◽  
Iftiker K. Ahmad ◽  
Barbara Pawlaczyk
2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (03) ◽  
pp. 260-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. A. Benish

Summary Objectives: This paper demonstrates that diagnostic test performance can be quantified as the average amount of information the test result (R) provides about the disease state (D). Methods: A fundamental concept of information theory, mutual information, is directly applicable to this problem. This statistic quantifies the amount of information that one random variable contains about another random variable. Prior to performing a diagnostic test, R and D are random variables. Hence, their mutual information, I(D;R), is the amount of information that R provides about D. Results: I(D;R) is a function of both 1) the pretest probabilities of the disease state and 2) the set of conditional probabilities relating each possible test result to each possible disease state. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a popular measure of diagnostic test performance which, in contrast to I(D;R), is independent of the pretest probabilities; it is a function of only the set of conditional probabilities. The AUC is not a measure of diagnostic information. Conclusions: Because I(D;R) is dependent upon pretest probabilities, knowledge of the setting in which a diagnostic test is employed is a necessary condition for quantifying the amount of information it provides. Advantages of I(D;R) over the AUC are that it can be calculated without invoking an arbitrary curve fitting routine, it is applicable to situations in which multiple diagnoses are under consideration, and it quantifies test performance in meaningful units (bits of information).


2003 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 1783-1784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor M Montori ◽  
Gordon H Guyatt

2020 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. e348
Author(s):  
Miles Mannas* ◽  
Sinan Khadhouri ◽  
Kevin M Gallagher ◽  
Kenneth R Mackenzie ◽  
Taimur T Shah ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 2002-2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Donovan ◽  
Fiona V Cresswell ◽  
Nguyen Thuy Thuong Thuong ◽  
David R Boulware ◽  
Guy E Thwaites ◽  
...  

Abstract The delayed diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) leads to poor outcomes, yet the current diagnostic methods for identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are inadequate. The first comparative study of the new GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) for TBM diagnosis suggested increased sensitivity of Xpert Ultra. Two subsequent studies have shown Xpert Ultra has improved sensitivity, but has insufficient negative predictive value to exclude TBM. Collecting and processing large volumes of CSF for mycobacterial testing are important for optimal diagnostic test performance. But clinical, radiological, and laboratory parameters remain essential for TBM diagnosis and empiric therapy is often needed. We therefore caution against the use of Xpert Ultra as a single diagnostic test for TBM; it cannot be used to “rule out” TBM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document