The Effects of HQs Control Mechanisms on the Host Country National’s Procedural Justice Perceptions and Relative Deprivation of MNC Subsidiaries in Korea

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-33
Author(s):  
Chi-Yeon You ◽  
◽  
Jun-Young Bae
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Host Country ◽  
Relative Deprivation ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Justice Perceptions

Employees’ justice perceptions as a factor influencing successful outsourcing in the hospitality industry

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1619-1637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara ◽  
Jyh-Ming Ting-Ding
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Hospitality Industry ◽  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Justice Perceptions ◽  
Hotel Managers ◽  
The Way

Purpose This study aims to hypothesize that the more in-house staff perceive themselves as beneficiaries of the procedural justice (PJ) followed in the outsourcing, or perceive their outsourced peers as recipients of distributive (DJ) and interactional justice (IJ), the more they will show acceptance and positive evaluations of the outsourcing initiatives. Although prior research in the hospitality industry has extensively studied individual-level reactions to organizational justice, no study has been undertaken to examine how hotel staff support and value outsourcing initiatives based on the way they perceive management’s treatment of them and their peers. Design/methodology/approach Questionnaire data from 215 in-house employees working side-by-side with outsourced employees at 14 hotels in Gran Canaria (Spain) were analyzed by using structural equation modeling. Findings The results found that in-house employees who perceived themselves or their outsourced peers as recipients of organizational justice to a greater extent reported greater support for outsourcing by expressing higher levels of acceptance and better evaluations. The results also supported procedural justice (PJ) as playing a dominant role over distributive (DJ) and interactional justice (IJ). Research limitations/implications The findings suggest that by encouraging justice perceptions among in-house employees, mainly those related to properly discussing the outsourcing procedures with affected employees, hotel managers can promote successful outsourcing. Given that in-house employees reacted not only to the way they were treated by hotel management but also to the way their outsourced peers were treated, the findings also indicate that all (un)fair treatment in outsourcing, regardless of the recipient, should receive explicit attention by hotel managers. Originality/value This paper is one of the first to primarily focus on the individual level of analysis in examining and supporting organizational justice in hotel firms as a factor influencing outsourcing success.

Do Procedural Justice Perceptions in a Selection Testing Context Predict Applicant Attraction and Intention Toward the Organization?

2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl P. Maertz ◽  
Donald C. Mosley ◽  
Talya N. Bauer ◽  
Richard A. Posthuma ◽  
Michael A. Campion
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Applicant Attraction ◽  
Justice Perceptions ◽  
Selection Testing

A cross‐level study of procedural justice perceptions

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 700-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice H.Y. Hon ◽  
Jixia Yang ◽  
Lin Lu
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Justice Perceptions

Why Do the Affluent Find Inequality Increasingly Unjust? Changing Inequality and Justice Perceptions in Germany, 1994–2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 651-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Sachweh ◽  
Evelyn Sthamer
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Justice ◽  
General Social Survey ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Perceived Injustice ◽  
Social Survey ◽  
Explanatory Factors ◽  
Income Groups ◽  
Justice Perceptions ◽  
Over Time

AbstractIn the wake of rising inequality in Germany during the last 20 years, we document a corresponding increase in perceptions of injustice among the population. Based on data from the cumulated German General Social Survey (ALLBUS), we show that this increase in perceived injustice is driven mainly by a rising share of affluent respondents who find society unjust, resulting in a convergence across income groups towards more critical attitudes. We try to explain this puzzling development based on outcome-related justice assessments and perceptions of procedural justice. We find that outcome-related justice assessments cannot explain the trend over time, but affect the overall level of injustice perceptions. The influence of perceptions of procedural justice, however, is more pronounced among affluent respondents and partly explains the increase in injustice perceptions within this group. These results are robust for different operationalizations as well as model specifications and are not due to compositional effects. Since we cannot account entirely for the rise in injustice perceptions among the affluent, explanatory factors not covered by our data are likely to exist. We conclude with a discussion of potential explanations that future research should address.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document