scholarly journals Together or separate? Contributions from neuroeducation to the debate on sex segregation in schools

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (Extra 295) ◽  
pp. 545-558
Author(s):  
Sonia Reverter

This article analyses the debate on the desirability of separating children by sex in schools. The study reviews the neuroscientific arguments that can inform decisions on this issue. The author starts from the understanding that the education debate should centre its decision not on neuroscientific findings, which are still inconclusive, but on a proposal that evaluates the aim of education. As a new field of study, neuroeducation has the opportunity to draw into the dialogue all the disciplines participating to that end.

2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 924-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Charles ◽  
Karen Bradley

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A Moorhouse

Data from 39 countries for the years 2008–2011 are used to explore how features of a country’s labor market influence sex segregation by field of study in higher education. A new feature of this empirical study is the use of the system generalized method of moments (system-GMM) to analyze these relationships. Two new labor market variables are included in this study: a measure of a country’s economic protections for women and the national unemployment rate. After controlling for the level of economic development and characteristics of each country’s tertiary system, the results indicate that labor market variables have an important impact on sex segregation by field of study. All else equal, countries that protect women’s economic rights are associated with lower levels of sex segregation by field. Although the finding is less robust, the empirical evidence also supports that countries with higher unemployment rates experience lower levels of sex segregation.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumiya Uchikoshi ◽  
Ryota Mugiyama ◽  
Megumi Oguro

There is much evidence to suggest that the gender wage gap in Japan is one of the highest in rich countries, while gender inequality in education at the vertical level is becoming increasingly equalized. A small number of studies suggest that the remaining gender gap can be attributed to horizontal segregation with respect to field of study, particularly female underrepresentation in STEM fields, and little is known about trends in sex segregation by field in Japan specifically. By using publicly available education statistics, the current study investigates these trends from 1975 through 2019. We paid particular attention to (1) different trends in non-STEM, STEM, and health fields, and (2) heterogeneity across national, public, and private institutions. The results of applying Duncan’s dissimilarity index to 68 fields of study among four-year university students reveal that the overall trend in sex segregation in field of study has decreased over the 45 years by 43%. We also found that trends differ based on both institutional characteristics of universities and academic field, as the declining segregation trend is mainly driven by the massive integration of men and women in non-STEM fields in private institutions. The declining trend in segregation has been slow in recent years, especially at national and public institutions. We explored potential mechanisms for these stalling trends, and suggest that the driving forces are (1) a slower integration of women in STEM fields and (2) a rise in segregation in health fields. These results provide support for the theory of a stalled gender revolution in Japan. This study concludes that the desegregation may not be linked to the gender equality in the labor market, and that horizontal segregation may even increase because of the growing demand for the workforce to deal with population aging in the future.


1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-191
Author(s):  
Paula England
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence D. Smith ◽  
Lindsay R. Owings ◽  
Carisa K. Perry-Parrish
Keyword(s):  

1969 ◽  
Vol 60 (4, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 284-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald L. Thistlethwaite

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Dahl ◽  
Dan-Olof Rooth ◽  
Anders Stenberg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document