The Food Habits of Polar Bears of James Bay and Southwest Hudson Bay in Summer and Autumn

ARCTIC ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H. Russell
Keyword(s):  
1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (7) ◽  
pp. 1410-1419 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. Wolff ◽  
R. L. Jefferies

Morphological and electrophoretic variation has been documented within and among populations of Salicornia europaea L. (s.l.) in northeastern North America. Univariate and multivariate analyses (discriminant analyses) of measurements of floral and vegetative characters delimited three morphologically distinct groups of populations: Atlantic coast tetraploids (2n = 36), Hudson Bay diploids, and Atlantic coast and James Bay diploids (2n = 18). The two diploid groups were morphologically distinct from the midwestern diploid, S. rubra Nels., based on anther length, width of the scarious border of the fertile segment, and the overall width of the fertile segment. Electrophoretic evidence supported the delimitation of the three distinct morphological groups of populations of S. europaea with the exception of the population from James Bay, which had electrophoretic patterns identical with those of plants from Hudson Bay but resembled the Atlantic coast diploids morphologically. Most enzyme systems assayed were monomorphic. Only homozygous banding patterns were detected in diploid plants and electrophoretic variation was not observed within populations of S. europaea or S. rubra but was detected between groups of populations. Four multilocus phenotypes were evident; these corresponded to the major groups recognized on the basis of ploidy level and morphology. Reasons that may account for the paucity of isozymic variation are discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 168 ◽  
pp. 364-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.D. Morris ◽  
R.J. Letcher ◽  
M. Dyck ◽  
B. Chandramouli ◽  
J. Cosgrove

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 854-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
René M. Malenfant ◽  
Corey S. Davis ◽  
Evan S. Richardson ◽  
Nicholas J. Lunn ◽  
David W. Coltman

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 2675-2687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Castro de la Guardia ◽  
Andrew E. Derocher ◽  
Paul G. Myers ◽  
Arjen D. Terwisscha van Scheltinga ◽  
Nick J. Lunn

1932 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. B. HACHEY

The waters of Hudson bay differ markedly from the waters of Hudson strait and the waters of the open ocean. Intense stratification in the upper twenty-five metres, decreasing as the waters of the open ocean are approached, gives Hudson bay the character of a large estuary. Below fifty metres the waters are for all purposes dynamically dead, thus resulting in a cold saline body of water which probably undergoes very little change from season to season. The movements of the waters at various levels are dealt with to show that the inflow of waters from Fox channel and the many fresh-water drainage areas control the hydrographic conditions as found. The main water movement is from the James bay area to Hudson strait and thence to the open ocean.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document