scholarly journals Nonlinear Inverse Problems with Integral Overdetermination for Nonstationary Differential Equations of High Order

Author(s):  
A.I. Kozhanov ◽  
◽  
L.A. Telesheva ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 727-738
Author(s):  
Victor Sadovnichii ◽  
Yaudat Talgatovich Sultanaev ◽  
Azamat Akhtyamov

AbstractWe consider a new class of inverse problems on the recovery of the coefficients of differential equations from a finite set of eigenvalues of a boundary value problem with unseparated boundary conditions. A finite number of eigenvalues is possible only for problems in which the roots of the characteristic equation are multiple. The article describes solutions to such a problem for equations of the second, third, and fourth orders on a graph with three, four, and five edges. The inverse problem with an arbitrary number of edges is solved similarly.


Author(s):  
Adrien Laurent ◽  
Gilles Vilmart

AbstractWe derive a new methodology for the construction of high-order integrators for sampling the invariant measure of ergodic stochastic differential equations with dynamics constrained on a manifold. We obtain the order conditions for sampling the invariant measure for a class of Runge–Kutta methods applied to the constrained overdamped Langevin equation. The analysis is valid for arbitrarily high order and relies on an extension of the exotic aromatic Butcher-series formalism. To illustrate the methodology, a method of order two is introduced, and numerical experiments on the sphere, the torus and the special linear group confirm the theoretical findings.


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 611-659
Author(s):  
Martin Hanke-Bourgeois ◽  
Andreas Kirsch ◽  
William Rundell ◽  
Matti Lassas

Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. R251-R269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bas Peters ◽  
Brendan R. Smithyman ◽  
Felix J. Herrmann

Nonlinear inverse problems are often hampered by local minima because of missing low frequencies and far offsets in the data, lack of access to good starting models, noise, and modeling errors. A well-known approach to counter these deficiencies is to include prior information on the unknown model, which regularizes the inverse problem. Although conventional regularization methods have resulted in enormous progress in ill-posed (geophysical) inverse problems, challenges remain when the prior information consists of multiple pieces. To handle this situation, we have developed an optimization framework that allows us to add multiple pieces of prior information in the form of constraints. The proposed framework is more suitable for full-waveform inversion (FWI) because it offers assurances that multiple constraints are imposed uniquely at each iteration, irrespective of the order in which they are invoked. To project onto the intersection of multiple sets uniquely, we use Dykstra’s algorithm that does not rely on trade-off parameters. In that sense, our approach differs substantially from approaches, such as Tikhonov/penalty regularization and gradient filtering. None of these offer assurances, which makes them less suitable to FWI, where unrealistic intermediate results effectively derail the inversion. By working with intersections of sets, we avoid trade-off parameters and keep objective calculations separate from projections that are often much faster to compute than objectives/gradients in 3D. These features allow for easy integration into existing code bases. Working with constraints also allows for heuristics, where we built up the complexity of the model by a gradual relaxation of the constraints. This strategy helps to avoid convergence to local minima that represent unrealistic models. Using multiple constraints, we obtain better FWI results compared with a quadratic penalty method, whereas all definitions of the constraints are in terms of physical units and follow from the prior knowledge directly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document