Text mining and visualisation of Protein-Protein Interactions

Author(s):  
Flora S. Tsai
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (D1) ◽  
pp. D605-D612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damian Szklarczyk ◽  
Annika L Gable ◽  
Katerina C Nastou ◽  
David Lyon ◽  
Rebecca Kirsch ◽  
...  

Abstract Cellular life depends on a complex web of functional associations between biomolecules. Among these associations, protein–protein interactions are particularly important due to their versatility, specificity and adaptability. The STRING database aims to integrate all known and predicted associations between proteins, including both physical interactions as well as functional associations. To achieve this, STRING collects and scores evidence from a number of sources: (i) automated text mining of the scientific literature, (ii) databases of interaction experiments and annotated complexes/pathways, (iii) computational interaction predictions from co-expression and from conserved genomic context and (iv) systematic transfers of interaction evidence from one organism to another. STRING aims for wide coverage; the upcoming version 11.5 of the resource will contain more than 14 000 organisms. In this update paper, we describe changes to the text-mining system, a new scoring-mode for physical interactions, as well as extensive user interface features for customizing, extending and sharing protein networks. In addition, we describe how to query STRING with genome-wide, experimental data, including the automated detection of enriched functionalities and potential biases in the user's query data. The STRING resource is available online, at https://string-db.org/.


Author(s):  
Oliver Giles ◽  
Anneli Karlsson ◽  
Spyroula Masiala ◽  
Simon White ◽  
Gianni Cesareni ◽  
...  

AbstractText mining is widely used within the life sciences as an evidence stream for inferring relationships between biological entities. In most cases, conventional string matching is used to identify cooccurrences of given entities within sentences. This limits the utility of text mining results, as they tend to contain significant noise due to weak inclusion criteria. We show that, in the indicative case of protein-protein interactions (PPIs), the majority of sentences containing cooccurrences (∽75%) do not describe any causal relationship. We further demonstrate the feasibility of fine tuning a strong domain-specific language model, BioBERT, to analyse sentences containing cooccurrences and accurately (F1 score: 88.95%) identify functional links between proteins. These strong results come in spite of the deep complexity of the language involved, which limits the accuracy even of expert curators. We establish guidelines for best practices in data creation to this end, including an examination of inter-annotator agreement, of semisupervision, and of rules based alternatives to manual curation, and explore the potential for downstream use of the model to accelerate curation of interactions in the SIGNOR database of causal protein interactions and the IntAct database of experimental evidence for physical protein interactions.


Author(s):  
Varsha D Badal ◽  
Petras J Kundrotas ◽  
Ilya A Vakser

Abstract Motivation Procedures for structural modeling of protein-protein complexes (protein docking) produce a number of models which need to be further analyzed and scored. Scoring can be based on independently determined constraints on the structure of the complex, such as knowledge of amino acids essential for the protein interaction. Previously, we showed that text mining of residues in freely available PubMed abstracts of papers on studies of protein-protein interactions may generate such constraints. However, absence of post-processing of the spotted residues reduced usability of the constraints, as a significant number of the residues were not relevant for the binding of the specific proteins. Results We explored filtering of the irrelevant residues by two machine learning approaches, Deep Recursive Neural Network (DRNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models with different training/testing schemes. The results showed that the DRNN model is superior to the SVM model when training is performed on the PMC-OA full-text articles and applied to classification (interface or non-interface) of the residues spotted in the PubMed abstracts. When both training and testing is performed on full-text articles or on abstracts, the performance of these models is similar. Thus, in such cases, there is no need to utilize computationally demanding DRNN approach, which is computationally expensive especially at the training stage. The reason is that SVM success is often determined by the similarity in data/text patterns in the training and the testing sets, whereas the sentence structures in the abstracts are, in general, different from those in the full text articles. Availability The code and the datasets generated in this study are available at https://gitlab.ku.edu/vakser-lab-public/text-mining/-/tree/2020-09-04. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


Database ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (0) ◽  
pp. bas017-bas017 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Krallinger ◽  
F. Leitner ◽  
M. Vazquez ◽  
D. Salgado ◽  
C. Marcelle ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiqiang Zeng ◽  
Hua Shi ◽  
Yun Wu ◽  
Zhiling Hong

Informatics methods, such as text mining and natural language processing, are always involved in bioinformatics research. In this study, we discuss text mining and natural language processing methods in bioinformatics from two perspectives. First, we aim to search for knowledge on biology, retrieve references using text mining methods, and reconstruct databases. For example, protein-protein interactions and gene-disease relationship can be mined from PubMed. Then, we analyze the applications of text mining and natural language processing techniques in bioinformatics, including predicting protein structure and function, detecting noncoding RNA. Finally, numerous methods and applications, as well as their contributions to bioinformatics, are discussed for future use by text mining and natural language processing researchers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document