Aligning donor and organisational interests: an analysis of college athletics fundraising officers

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
Matt R. Huml ◽  
Christopher M. McLeod
Keyword(s):  

This book is the second volume of the two-volume The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Sports which includes articles by nearly all of the important authors in the quickly growing field of sports economics. The two volumes consider in depth the ways that economics and sports interact with each other. To start with, economic analysis has helped with the understanding of many of the different institutions in sports. Secondly, quality data about individual productivity, salaries, career histories, teamwork, and managerial behavior has been useful in helping economists study topics as varied as the economics of discrimination, salary dispersion, and antitrust policy. The volumes are also rich from the point of view of the sports fan. Every major team sport is covered, and many interesting comparisons can be made especially between the North American League organization and the European-style promotion and relegation leagues. Golf, NASCAR, college athletics, women's sports, the Olympics, and even bowling are represented in these pages.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Paul Massaro ◽  
Travis T. Tygart ◽  
Timothy Neal ◽  
Ken Wright
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney Fort

It is widely held that collegiate athletic directors are trapped in an expenditure arms race.  But the arms race explanation completely omits the actual consideration of the university budgeting process.  In its place, the arms race logic imposes strained assumptions about the cooperative setting and the naïveté of university administrators, along with a curious distinction of one type of revenue to reach its conclusions.  And the interpretation of the data on spending and benefits from college sports has not been done particularly well in the past. This paper presents an alternative principal-agent explanation that is based on the observed actual financial (budget) relationship between university administrators and their athletic department and consistent with the entirety of the aggregate-level data on college athletics finance.  Empirically discerning between the two models is crucial since each generates decidedly different policy implications.


2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-62
Author(s):  
E. Paul Roetert
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 257-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jami S. Leichliter ◽  
Philip W. Meilman ◽  
Cheryl A. Presley ◽  
Jeffrey R. Cashin

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-35
Author(s):  
Cary A. Caro

AbstractConference realignment in NCAA college athletics impacted traditional rivalries and affiliations as it took shape from 2010 to 2013. As schools traded conferences, their college football programs were left to compete against new foes, and in new markets for high school athletes. The impact of brand recognition, prestige, and new conference affiliation on recruiting are examined herein. The findings of the market competitive externalities are important for every labour market in which business opt to compete.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document