How can knowledge sharing be influenced by organisational social capital, workplace friendship, team culture and public service motivation in the public sector

Author(s):  
Ngan Thi Thanh Vo ◽  
Vuong Phuong Dinh ◽  
Phuong Nguyen ◽  
Ngan Thi Thanh Nguyen ◽  
Quyen Thi Thuy Nguyen
Author(s):  
Phuong V. Nguyen ◽  
Ngan Thi Thanh Nguyen ◽  
Quyen Thi Thuy Nguyen

This paper aims to establish a research model of knowledge sharing in the public sector and attempts to explain why some public organizations can benefit from knowledge sharing while others cannot. The antecedents of knowledge sharing in the model consist of attitude, public service motivation, organizational social capital, workplace friendship, and team culture. Based on a survey of 343 managers of public organizations in Southern Vietnam, the results illustrate that attitude toward knowledge sharing, organizational social capital, and workplace friendship significantly influence knowledge sharing. By contrast, there is no evidence supporting direct impacts of public service motivation and team culture on knowledge sharing. The study also highlights some theoretical contributions and makes specific recommendations for motivating public servants to participate in knowledge sharing activities.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Sally Jansen van Vuuren

<p>This thesis explores the dynamics of knowledge sharing, through the context of interorganisational collaboration in the public sector. The growth of collaboration across public sector organisations places increasing importance on knowledge sharing, yet it is an area that has historically proved difficult for the sector. Knowledge sharing research increasingly emphasises the importance of social capital in facilitating and influencing knowledge sharing behaviours, yet the public sector’s approach to knowledge sharing has predominantly focussed on the use of information and communication technology (ICT) tools. The aim of this research is to better understand the dynamics of knowledge sharing, and the roles that social capital and ICT play in knowledge sharing. This is a contemporary and important research topic. Public sector commitment to increasing collaboration requires a strong focus on inter-organisational knowledge sharing. This multiple-case, multi-method research incorporates a research design that blends qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. The research extends and deepens current understanding of the dynamics of knowledge sharing and contributes to the existing body of knowledge in the areas of knowledge sharing, social capital, and ICT. It also provides valuable empirical evidence relating to public sector based sharing at the inter-organisational level. The research found that social capital is a significant concern for collaborative teams. Factors such as trust, group identity and shared purpose and goals were identified as important considerations for team members. Despite the sector’s focus on ICT tools as key knowledge sharing mechanisms, the actual availability of tools was limited. Further, individuals’ use of tools was low due to their perceptions of the available tools as difficult to use and of limited usefulness. A key outcome of the research was the development of a conceptual framework that can be used to support the work of academics and practitioners engaged in the field of collaboration and knowledge sharing. The framework identifies six important antecedents that influence the development of social capital, and the availability and use of ICT. These antecedents include collaboration design, leadership, the perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of ICT, and individual technical ability. The final antecedent identifies individual’s commitment to the ‘intrinsic value of public sector work’ as a key collaboration factor.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 67-86
Author(s):  
Jonghwan Eun

The demand for innovation in public organizations is increasing. In this study, I explore factors that contribute to the innovative behavior of civil servants at the individual level. The theoretical distinction between public and private organizations has long been a subject of debate, and certain characteristics of innovation in public organizations mimic innovation in the private sector, even though the purpose of innovation in public organizations is to secure public goods. In order to examine the innovative behavior of public employees who face such contradictory circumstances, I parameterized the characteristics of each sector, using whether or not the employee had worked in the private sector prior to entering the public service as the characteristic for the private sector and the effect of public service motivation on innovative behavior as the characteristic for the public sector and found that at the individual level, the two are not mutually exclusive.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document