scholarly journals Is Preoperative Exercise Training the New Holy Grail for Patients Undergoing Major Surgery?

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-589
Author(s):  
Daniel Steffens ◽  
Michael Solomon ◽  
Linda Denehy
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Fialho Fontenele Garcia ◽  
Vinicius Cavalheri ◽  
Adriana Claudia Lunardi

Abstract Background Abdominal cancer surgeries have a high incidence of postoperative complications. One strategy to prevent postoperative complications is preoperative exercise training. There are no systematic reviews that have compared the effects of preoperative exercise training programs of different length, frequency and duration on pre and postoperative clinical outcomes as well as on length of hospital stay (LOS) and in-hospital and late mortality in people with abdominal cancer. Methods Searches for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of preoperative exercise training for people undergoing major surgery for abdominal cancer will be conducted in Pubmed, EMBASE, PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) and the Cochrane Library. There will be no restrictions on the language or date of publication in the search. The primary outcomes of the systematic review will be incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications as well as post-intervention and postoperative exercise capacity. The risk of bias of included RCTs will be assessed using the PEDro scale. The quality of evidence will be rated using the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Subgroup analyzes will be conducted based on: intervention performed with or without supervision; types of exercises; and frequency and duration of the intervention. Discussion Our hypothesis is that preoperative exercise training will reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in people undergoing major surgery for abdominal cancer by improving their preoperative exercise capacity. We will also explore the effects of the program on LOS and mortality. Systematic review registration: This systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (Prospective International Register of Systematic Reviews) (number CRD42020199765).


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 486-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Sebio Garcia ◽  
Maria Isabel Yáñez Brage ◽  
Esther Giménez Moolhuyzen ◽  
Catherine L. Granger ◽  
Linda Denehy

BJS Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Christensen ◽  
C. Simonsen ◽  
A. Banck-Petersen ◽  
S. Thorsen-Streit ◽  
A. Herrstedt ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17047-17047
Author(s):  
C. J. Peddle ◽  
N. D. Eves ◽  
K. S. Courneya ◽  
M. Haykowsky ◽  
J. R. Mackey ◽  
...  

17047 Background: Exercise capacity is a strong independent predictor of surgical outcome in patients with operable NSCLC and thus an established clinical tool to assess preoperative eligibility. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of preoperative exercise training on exercise capacity in operable lung cancer. Methods: Using a single-group design, participants with suspected operable lung cancer were screened for eligibility at the time of diagnosis. Twenty-six patients were recruited and offered exercise training until surgical resection. Exercise training consisted of 5 endurance cycle ergometry sessions per week at 60 to 100% of patient’s baseline exercise capacity. Patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) including peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), six minute walk distance (6MWD), and a pulmonary function test at baseline, immediately prior and 30 days post surgical resection. Results: The mean time from diagnosis to resection was 67 ± 27 days. During this time, 6 patients were deemed ineligible and were removed from the analysis. Of the remaining 20 patients, 18 completed exercise training and 13 performed CPET post resection. The overall adherence rate was 72% (range 0%–100%) with patients completing a mean of 30 exercise sessions (range 0–75). Intention-to-treat analysis indicated that VO2peak and 6MWD increased by 2.3 mL · kg−1 · min−1 [95% CI, 1.0 to 3.7; p = .002] and 40m [95% CI, 16 to 64; p=.003] respectively, from baseline to presurgery but decreased from pre to post resection [VO2peak, −2.7 mL · kg−1 · min−1, 95% CI, −3.9 to −1.6; p < .001; 6 MWD, −44 m, 95% CI, −94 to 6.4; p = .082]. There were no differences between baseline and postsurgical exercise capacity. Per protocol analyses indicated that patients who achieved acceptable exercise adherence (≥80% of prescribed sessions, n = 12) increased VO2peak and 6MWD by 3.2 mL · kg−1 · min−1 [95% CI, 1.1 to 5.4; p = .005] and 49 meters [95% CI, 12 to 85; p = .013], respectively. Conclusion: Preoperative exercise training is associated with improvements in exercise capacity in patients with operable NSCLC, particularly if acceptable adherence is achieved. This benefit may have important implications for surgical outcome and postsurgical recovery in this population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Thorax ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. thoraxjnl-2021-217242
Author(s):  
Francis-Edouard Gravier ◽  
Pauline Smondack ◽  
Guillaume Prieur ◽  
Clement Medrinal ◽  
Yann Combret ◽  
...  

IntroductionExercise training before lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer is believed to decrease postoperative complications (POC) by improving cardiorespiratory fitness. However, this intervention lacks a strong evidence base.AimTo assess the effectiveness of preoperative exercise training compared with usual care on POC and other secondary outcomes in patients with scheduled lung resection.MethodsA systematic search of randomised trials was conducted by two authors. Meta-analysis was performed, and the effect of exercise training was estimated by risk ratios (RR) and mean differences, with their CIs. Clinical usefulness was estimated according to minimal important difference values (MID).ResultsFourteen studies involving 791 participants were included. Compared with usual care, exercise training reduced overall POC (10 studies, 617 participants, RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75) and clinically relevant POC (4 studies, 302 participants, Clavien-Dindo score ≥2 RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.69). The estimate of the effect of exercise training on mortality was very imprecise (6 studies, 456 participants, RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.22). The main risks of bias were a lack of participant blinding and selective reporting. Exercise training appeared to improve exercise capacity, pulmonary function and also quality of life and depression, although the clinical usefulness of the changes was unclear. The quality of the evidence was graded for each outcome.ConclusionPreoperative exercise training leads to a worthwhile reduction in postoperative complications. These estimates were both accurate and large enough to make recommendations for clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document