1 The Neoclassical Theory of the Consumer

2020 ◽  
pp. 5-23
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
pp. 75-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Lawson

The author elaborates on methodological issues of current tendencies in neoclassical theory and demonstrates the necessity of an alternative model of science, which he calls "realist". According to this perspective, constant and regular conjunctions of economic life events should not be the main object of analysis. Rather, the author proposes to consider structures and mechanisms governing events in question. Instead of deductivism, which, as Lawson believes, is a fundamental feature of orthodox economics, the abductive method of economic explanation is proposed that entails investigation of major powers, on which any social phenomenon depends. Society is thereby regarded not as a closed, but rather as an open system.


1993 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm Knight ◽  
Norman Loayza ◽  
Delano Villanueva

2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 023003 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Arévalo ◽  
J.A. Alonso ◽  
K.J. McCarthy ◽  
J.L. Velasco

Author(s):  
D. Andrews

In classical political economy, the real wage derives its reality from its association with a given set of products that provides for the subsistence of workers through time. In neoclassical theory the connection between the real wage and a given set of products is broken, because the restriction of workers’ consumption to a particular set of products conflicts with the idea of individual consumer preference. Thus, the ‘reality’ of the real wage in neoclassical theory is grounded differently, in a particular standard of value that can be called an index number standard. The difficulties involved with this construction raise questions about the theoretical adequacy of the notion of real wage itself. In particular, this leads to a conclusion that stands in sharp contrast to the empiricist proclamations of neoclassical theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document