Gender Features of the Kinship System and Terminology Among the Udeghe

Author(s):  
Albina Girfanova
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-103
Author(s):  
O.S. Andreeva ◽  
◽  
K.A. Volodina ◽  
E.B. Shurakova ◽  
◽  
...  

Philologos ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
M.Yu. Ezaova ◽  
◽  
M.L. Kardanov ◽  
D.H. Shugusheva ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Think India ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-192
Author(s):  
Dr. Oinam Ranjit Singh ◽  
Dr. Nushar Bargayary

The Bodo of the North Eastern region of India have their own kinship system to maintain social relationship since ancient periods. Kinship is the expression of social relationship. Kinship may be defined as connection or relationships between persons based on marriage or blood. In each and every society of the world, social relationship is considered to be the more important than the biological bond. The relationship is not socially recognized, it fall outside the realm of kinship. Since kinship is considered as universal, it plays a vital role in the socialization of individuals and the maintenance of social cohesion of the group. Thus, kinship is considered to be the study of the sum total of these relations. The kinship of the Bodo is bilateral. The kin related through the father is known as Bahagi in Bodo whereas the kin to the mother is called Kurma. The nature of social relationships, the kinship terms, kinship behaviours and prescriptive and proscriptive rules are the important themes of the present study.


Author(s):  
I.R. Shagina ◽  
◽  
T.A. Smakhtina ◽  
A.S. Kubekova ◽  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-108
Author(s):  
T. V. Slotina ◽  
◽  
Yu. S. Nedoshivina ◽  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-82
Author(s):  
А. N. Shvets ◽  
◽  
I. S. Arzhannikov ◽  
T. V. Havrylova ◽  
Y. N. Shvets ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1971 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan D. Coult ◽  
Robert W. Rabenstein
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Charles W. Nuckolls

This chapter explores the Kantian antinomies and the knowledge systems that develop out of them, then turns to antinomies that are not rationally construed, but embedded in cultural knowledge systems, like kinship. The example given is the case of the kinship system of south India, which pits different modes of solidarity against each other while insisting that both should exist as ends toward which the system should progress. The result is an analysis of antinomies as robust and powerful creators of knowledge systems by showing that knowledge systems are deeply paradoxical, and develop as dialectical structures in pursuit of resolutions that can never be achieved.


1945 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Spencer
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document