scholarly journals A best-fit probability distribution for the estimation of rainfall in northern regions of Pakistan

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 432-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. T. Amin ◽  
M. Rizwan ◽  
A. A. Alazba
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Maximum Rainfall ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Goodness Of Fit Tests ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Northern Regions ◽  
Best Fit

AbstractThis study was designed to find the best-fit probability distribution of annual maximum rainfall based on a twenty-four-hour sample in the northern regions of Pakistan using four probability distributions: normal, log-normal, log-Pearson type-III and Gumbel max. Based on the scores of goodness of fit tests, the normal distribution was found to be the best-fit probability distribution at the Mardan rainfall gauging station. The log-Pearson type-III distribution was found to be the best-fit probability distribution at the rest of the rainfall gauging stations. The maximum values of expected rainfall were calculated using the best-fit probability distributions and can be used by design engineers in future research.

Temporal and spatial variations in annual rainfall distribution in Erbil province

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67
Author(s):  
Tariq H Karim ◽  
Dawod R Keya ◽  
Zahir A Amin
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Kendall Test ◽  
Distribution Functions ◽  
Annual Rainfall ◽  
Maximum Rainfall ◽  
Probability Distribution Functions ◽  
Goodness Of Fit Tests ◽  
Annual Maximum Rainfall ◽  
Best Fit

This study aimed to determine the best fit probability distribution of annual maximum rainfall using data from nine stations within Erbil province using different statistical analyses. Nine commonly used probability distribution functions, namely Normal, Lognormal (LN), one-parameter gamma (1P-G), 2P-G, 3P-G, Log Pearson, Weibull, Pareto, and Beta, were assessed. On the basis of maximum overall score, obtained by adding individual point scores from three selected goodness-of-fit tests, the best fit probability distribution was identified. Results showed that the 2P-G distribution and LN distribution were the best fit probability distribution functions for annual rainfall for the region. The analysis of annual rainfall records in Erbil city spanning from 1964 to 2013, covering three periods, also revealed significant temporal changes in the shape and scale parameter patterns of the fitted gamma distribution. Based on the reliable annual rainfall data in the region, the shape and scale parameters were then regionalized, hence it is possible to find the parameter values for any desired location within the study area. The Mann–Kendall test results indicated that there was a decreasing trend in rainfall over most of the study area in recent decades.

scholarly journals Flood Flow Probability Distribution Model Selection on Niger/Benue River Basins in Nigeria

2021 ◽  
pp. 76-94
Author(s):  
Itolima Ologhadien
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
River Basins ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Best Fit

Flood frequency analysis is a crucial component of flood risk management which seeks to establish a quantile relationship between peak discharges and their exceedance (or non-exceedance) probabilities, for planning, design and management of infrastructure in river basins. This paper evaluates the performance of five probability distribution models using the method of moments for parameter estimation, with five GoF-tests and Q-Q plots for selection of best –fit- distribution. The probability distributions models employed are; Gumbel (EV1), 2-parameter lognormal (LN2), log Pearson type III (LP3), Pearson type III(PR3), and Generalised Extreme Value( GEV). The five statistical goodness – of – fit tests, namely; modified index of agreement (Dmod), relative root mean square error (RRMSE), Nash – Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), Percent bias (PBIAS), ratio of RMSE and standard deviation of the measurement (RSR) were used to identify the most suitable distribution models. The study was conducted using annual maximum series of nine gauge stations in both Benue and Niger River Basins in Nigeria. The study reveals that GEV was the best – fit distribution in six gauging stations, LP3 was best – fit distribution in two gauging stations, and PR3 is best- fit distribution in one gauging station. This study has provided a significant contribution to knowledge in the choice of distribution models for predicting extreme hydrological events for design of water infrastructure in Nigeria. It is recommended that GEV, PR3 and LP3 should be considered in the development of regional flood frequency using the existing hydrological map of Nigeria.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Probability Distribution Models of Flood flow in Lower Niger Basin

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
Itolima Ologhadien
Keyword(s):  
Water Resources ◽  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Optimum Distribution ◽  
Water Resources Systems ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Pearson Type

The choice of optimum probability distribution model that would accurately simulate flood discharges at a particular location or region has remained a challenging problem to water resources engineers. In practice, several probability distributions are evaluated, and the optimum distribution is then used to establish the quantile - probability relationship for planning, design and management of water resources systems, risk assessment in flood plains and flood insurance. This paper presents the evaluation of five probability distributions models: Gumbel (EV1), 2-parameter lognormal (LN2), log pearson type III (LP3), Pearson type III(PR3), and Generalised Extreme Value (GEV) using the method of moments (MoM) for parameter estimation and annual maximum series of five hydrological stations in the lower Niger River Basin in Nigeria. The choice of optimum probability distribution model was made on five statistical goodness – of – fit measures; modified index of agreement (Dmod), relative root mean square error (RRMSE), Nash – Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), Percent bias (PBIAS), ratio of RMSE and standard deviation of the measurement (RSR), and probability plot correlation coefficient (PPCC). The results show that GEV is the optimum distribution in 3 stations, and LP3 in 2 stations. On the overall GEV is the best – fit distribution, seconded by PR3 and thirdly, LP3. Furthermore, GEV simulated discharges were in closest agreement with the observed flood discharges. It is recommended that GEV, PR3 and LP3 should be considered in the final selection of optimum probability distribution model in Nigeria.

scholarly journals ASSESSMENT OF THE BEST PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION METHOD IN RAINFALL FREQUENCY ANALYSIS FOR A TROPICAL REGION

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Luo Sheng Yong ◽  
Jing Lin Ng ◽  
Yuk Feng Huang ◽  
Chun Kit Ang
Keyword(s):  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Gumbel Distribution ◽  
Tropical Region ◽  
Distribution Method ◽  
Maximum Rainfall ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Goodness Of Fit Tests ◽  
Passing Rate ◽  
Pearson Type

The Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) curve defines the relationship between rainfall intensities at certain durations and with the frequencies. The IDF Curve is extensively used in many applications such as flood modelling and peak discharge estimation. Over the years, the frequent occurrence of flood has become a great challenge in Kelantan river basin. Herein, IDF curves using frequency analyses based on different distributions were developed and compared. The historical rainfall data at eight rainfall stations for the period of 1985-2019 were selected for the assessment purpose. The Gumbel, Normal and Log Pearson Type III distributions were fitted into the annual maximum rainfall series for durations varying from 30 minutes to 24 hours. The goodness of fit tests were then used to evaluate the performances of each frequency distribution. It was found that the Gumbel distribution gave the highest passing rate followed by the Log Pearson Type III and then the Normal distributions. The Gumbel distribution resulted in respective 86% and 75% passing rate since most of the p-values generated by both the K-S and the Mann-Whitney test were greater than 5% of significance level leading to the acceptance of the null hypothesis. Thus, the Gumbel distribution is suggested for the frequency analyses in this study.

scholarly journals Estimating the Best-Fitted Probability Distribution for Monthly Maximum Temperature at the Sylhet Station in Bangladesh

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-67
Author(s):  
Rashidul Hasan Rashidul Hasan
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Probability Model ◽  
Temperature Data ◽  
Maximum Temperature ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Goodness Of Fit Tests ◽  
Anderson Darling ◽  
Log Normal

The estimation of a suitable probability model depends mainly on the features of available temperature data at a particular place. As a result, existing probability distributions must be evaluated to establish an appropriate probability model that can deliver precise temperature estimation. The study intended to estimate the best-fitted probability model for the monthly maximum temperature at the Sylhet station in Bangladesh from January 2002 to December 2012 using several statistical analyses. Ten continuous probability distributions such as Exponential, Gamma, Log-Gamma, Beta, Normal, Log-Normal, Erlang, Power Function, Rayleigh, and Weibull distributions were fitted for these tasks using the maximum likelihood technique. To determine the model’s fit to the temperature data, several goodness-of-fit tests were applied, including the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Anderson-Darling test, and Chi-square test. The Beta distribution is found to be the best-fitted probability distribution based on the largest overall score derived from three specified goodness-of-fit tests for the monthly maximum temperature data at the Sylhet station.

scholarly journals Best Fitted Distribution For Meteorological Data In Kuala Krai

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-25
Author(s):  
Siti Mariam Norrulashikin ◽  
Fadhilah Yusof ◽  
Siti Rohani Mohd Nor ◽  
Nur Arina Bazilah Kamisan
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Meteorological Data ◽  
Cumulative Distribution ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Data Series ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Goodness Of Fit Tests

Modeling meteorological variables is a vital aspect of climate change studies. Awareness of the frequency and magnitude of climate change is a critical concern for mitigating the risks associated with climate change. Probability distribution models are valuable tools for a frequency study of climate variables since it measures how the probability distribution able to fit well in the data series. Monthly meteorological data including average temperature, wind speed, and rainfall were analyzed in order to determine the most suited probability distribution model for Kuala Krai district. The probability distributions that were used in the analysis were Beta, Burr, Gamma, Lognormal, and Weibull distributions. To estimate the parameters for each distribution, the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) was employed. Goodness-of-fit tests such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and Anderson-Darling tests were conducted to assess the best suited model, and the test's reliability. Results from statistical studies indicate that Burr distributions better characterize the meteorological data of our research. The graph of probability density function, cumulative distribution function as well as Q-Q plot are presented.

scholarly journals Selecting the best probability distribution for at-site flood frequency analysis; a study of Torne River

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmood Ul Hassan ◽  
Omar Hayat ◽  
Zahra Noreen
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Direct Method ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Likelihood Estimation ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Goodness Of Fit Tests ◽  
Pearson Type

AbstractAt-site flood frequency analysis is a direct method of estimation of flood frequency at a particular site. The appropriate selection of probability distribution and a parameter estimation method are important for at-site flood frequency analysis. Generalized extreme value, three-parameter log-normal, generalized logistic, Pearson type-III and Gumbel distributions have been considered to describe the annual maximum steam flow at five gauging sites of Torne River in Sweden. To estimate the parameters of distributions, maximum likelihood estimation and L-moments methods are used. The performance of these distributions is assessed based on goodness-of-fit tests and accuracy measures. At most sites, the best-fitted distributions are with LM estimation method. Finally, the most suitable distribution at each site is used to predict the maximum flood magnitude for different return periods.

Best-fit probability distribution model for predicting annual maximum rainfall of Pusa (Bihar)

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
pp. 100-104
Author(s):  
J. Kumar ◽  
R. Suresh ◽  
Jyoti .
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Gumbel Distribution ◽  
Annual Rainfall ◽  
Annual Maximum ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Maximum Rainfall ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Annual Maximum Rainfall ◽  
Pearson Type Iii Distribution

In present study an attempt has been made to evaluate the suitable probability distribution models for predicting 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7-days annual maximum rainfall amounts based on 39 years (1964 to 2002) daily rainfall data. Three probability distribution models namely: Log Normal distribution, Log Pearson Type-III distribution and Gumbel distribution models were considered to evaluate their goodness of fit. The Weibull’s method was used for computation of observed rainfall values at1, 5, 20, 30, 50, 95 and 99 percent probability levels. The Log Pearson type –III distribution was found suitable for 1 and 2 days maximum annual rainfall, while Gumbel distribution was found to be the best for predicting 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7- days annual maximum rainfall amounts. The relationships between annual maximum rainfall and return periods were also developed. The non – linear relationships (i.e. logarithmic) were found to be most suitable for all the cases.

scholarly journals Best fitting probability distributions for annual maximum discharge data of the river Kopili, Assam

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-52
Author(s):  
Abhijit Bhuyan ◽  
Munindra Borah
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Annual Maximum ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
Generalized Pareto ◽  
Maximum Discharge ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Best Fitting ◽  
Log Normal

In this study our main objective is to determine the best fitting probability distribution for annual maximum flood discharge data of river Kopili, Assam. Various probability distributions i.e. Gumbel (G), generalized extreme value (GEV), normal (N), log-normal (LN3), generalized logistic (GLO), generalized pareto (GPA) and Pearson type-III (PE3) have been used for our study. The L-moments methods have been used for estimating the parameters of all the distributions. The root mean square error (RMSE), model efficiency and D-index (fit in the top six values) together with L-moment ratio diagram is used for goodness of fit measure. It has been observed that Generalized Pareto is the best fitting probability distribution for annual maximum discharge data of river Kopili.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document