scholarly journals Branching law for finite subgroups of 𝐒𝐋 3 ℂ$\mathbf {SL}_3\mathbb {C}$ and McKay correspondence

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Butin ◽  
Gadi S. Perets

Abstract.Given a finite subgroup

2004 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 495-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Gomi ◽  
Iku Nakamura ◽  
Ken-ichi Shinoda

AbstractFor most of the finite subgroups of SL(3; C) we give explicit formulae for the Molien series of the coinvariant algebras, generalizing McKay's formulae [McKay99] for subgroups of SU(2). We also study the G-orbit Hilbert scheme HilbG(C3) for any finite subgroup G of SO(3), which is known to be a minimal (crepant) resolution of the orbit space C3/G. In this case the fiber over the origin of the Hilbert-Chow morphism from HilbG(C3) to C3/G consists of finitely many smooth rational curves, whose planar dual graph is identified with a certain subgraph of the representation graph of G. This is an SO(3) version of the McKay correspondence in the SU(2) case.


2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-173
Author(s):  
HARM DERKSEN

Suppose that H is a finite subgroup of a linear algebraic group, G. It was proved by Donkin that there exists a finite-dimensional rational representation of G whose restriction to H is free. This paper gives a short proof of this in characteristic 0. The author also studies more closely which representations of H can appear as a restriction of G.


2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-57
Author(s):  
ALVARO NOLLA DE CELIS

AbstractGiven a finite subgroup G⊂GL(2,ℂ), it is known that the minimal resolution of singularity ℂ2/G is the moduli space Y=G-Hilb(ℂ2) of G-clusters ⊂ℂ2. The explicit description of Y can be obtained by calculating every possible distinguished basis for as vector spaces. These basis are the so-called G-graphs. In this paper we classify G-graphs for any small binary dihedral subgroup G in GL(2,ℂ), and in the context of the special McKay correspondence we use this classification to give a combinatorial description of special representations of G appearing in Y in terms of its maximal normal cyclic subgroup H ⊴ G.


1978 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Majeed ◽  
A. W. Mason

In a recent paper [5] Tits proves that a linear group over a field of characteristic zero is either solvable-by-finite or else contains a non-cyclic free subgroup. In this note we determine all the infinite irreducible solvable-by-finite subgroups of GL(2, F), where F is an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. (Every reducible subgroup of GL(2, F) is metabelian.) In addition, we prove that an irreducible subgroup of GL(2, F) has an irreducible solvable-by-finite subgroup if and only if it contains an element of zero trace.


2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 399-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
NOEL BRADY

We prove that every finite subgroup of a hyperbolic group G can be conjugated to a 2δ+1 neighborhood of the identity element, where δ is the hyperbolicity constant for G with respect to a given generating set. This gives an upper bound for the size of such finite subgroups in terms of δ and the number of generators for G.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
LUIS JORGE SÁNCHEZ SALDAÑA

Abstract We say a group G satisfies properties (M) and (NM) if every nontrivial finite subgroup of G is contained in a unique maximal finite subgroup, and every nontrivial finite maximal subgroup is self-normalizing. We prove that the Bredon cohomological dimension and the virtual cohomological dimension coincide for groups that admit a cocompact model for EG and satisfy properties (M) and (NM). Among the examples of groups satisfying these hypothesis are cocompact and arithmetic Fuchsian groups, one-relator groups, the Hilbert modular group, and 3-manifold groups.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (02) ◽  
pp. 301-311
Author(s):  
Paolo Leonetti ◽  
Andrea Marino

Let [Formula: see text] be a commutative ring, [Formula: see text] a multivariate polynomial, and [Formula: see text] a finite subgroup of the group of units of [Formula: see text] satisfying a certain constraint, which always holds if [Formula: see text] is a field. Then, we evaluate [Formula: see text], where the summation is taken over all pairwise distinct [Formula: see text]. In particular, let [Formula: see text] be a power of an odd prime, [Formula: see text] a positive integer coprime with [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] integers such that [Formula: see text] divides [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] does not divide [Formula: see text] for all non-empty proper subsets [Formula: see text]; then [Formula: see text] where the summation is taken over all pairwise distinct [Formula: see text]th residues [Formula: see text] modulo [Formula: see text] coprime with [Formula: see text].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document