The Progress of Chinese Legal Protection in Genetic Resources

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhu Xuezhong ◽  
Zhou Yongtao ◽  
Tang Jie

AbstractThe Chinese legal protection and its development in genetic resources are subject to this paper. Since China is one of the countries with rich genetic resources, it is important to apply current legal systems and enact laws or regulations for the protection of intellectual property right in the field of genetic resources. This paper describes the present situation of the Chinese law system including laws and regulations issued by the State Council, Government Office and local governments on protection of intellectual property right in genetic resources and other suggestions being made. At the same time, this paper also discusses the trend of relevant laws and regulations of protection on Chinese genetic resources.

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Junli ◽  
Zhu Xuezhong ◽  
He Guangyuan

AbstractThis paper deals with the Chinese law system on protecting the biotechnology intellectual property right. This law system includes the copyright law and the patent law, etc. as well as the regulations being issued by the Chinese State Council and the Chinese Council Ministries and the authorized local governments, such as the Protection of New Varieties of Plants issued by the Chinese State Council. The establishment and application of this law system in the area of biotechnology have resulted in a rapid development of biotechnology and life sciences in China. In the meantime, optimized law system to protect the intellectual property right has been demanded, in order to fit the further exploitation, application and commercialization of the techniques and productions in the area of the biotechnology and the life sciences. The history, current situation and several special topics for Chinese laws to protect intellectual property right in biotechnology shall be presented and related suggestion raised.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-85
Author(s):  
Monica Florina Boța Moisin

Protection of cultural identity designs is a necessity in today’s society and should be the subject of a joint European cultural policy. Constantly present not only in the fashion industry but all creative industries, designs inspired by tradition are and cannot be regarded as “just a trend”. Creative design is fundamentally different than tradition inspired design, as the latter is strictly connected with the interpretation of the values, traditions and creative mantras of the generating communities.In view of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions autochthonous elements of identity design fall in the category of cultural goods. The discussion is placed in the field of public international law and calls for the development of cultural intellectual property, as an individual branch of law, within the national legal system. The main question of this paper is whether a cultural intellectual property right should be granted constitutional recognition. This paper further proposes the design and implementation of a protection system dedicated to safeguarding and promoting autochthonous elements of design through mechanisms that ensure authenticity, encourage creativity and innovation with respect of cultural identity, and positive exploitation of traditional knowledge. This core of this discussion stems from a project pilot initiated in Romania, supporting the development of a dedicated legal protection mechanism for IA – the Romanian Blouse, a Romanian element of ancestral fashion that has recurrently inspired fashion designers worldwide, and the cultural movement La Blouse Roumaine, that led to the recognition of a universal celebration of the Romanian Blouse on June 24th – The Universal Day of the Romanian Blouse.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (42) ◽  
pp. 99-116
Author(s):  
Oksana Korotiuk

The article is devoted to the content of the concepts "intellectual property" and "right of intellectual property", as well as to the possibility to use them as equivalent concepts. The author considers the features of a broad understanding of the intellectual property concept, in which it is revealed as a complex set of social relations arising at all levels of public life. According to this approach intellectual relations are only one type of the varieties of intellectual property relations, the totality of which only occasionally acts as the subject of legal regulation. Taking into account the above facts, the difference between the meaning of the concepts "intellectual property" (in the sense of this concept as a social relation) and "intellectual property right" is reflected in the content of the structural elements of the relations that denote these concepts: 1) Subjects of intellectual property rights are determined on the basis of compliance with certain legal requirements regarding legal personality, as well as the acquisition of subjective legal rights and obligations, which are provided to them by legal norms (by using their legal personality); the subjects of intellectual property become participants of social relations of different levels, including those, which are outside the legal regulation. Such interactions may be related to realization of creative abilities of a person, mental activity, etc.; 2) In the centre of understanding of the concept "object of intellectual property rights" is the content of intellectual property rights as a totality of personal non-property and property rights. The defining aspect of legal protection is the right to the created object of intellectual property rights. At the same time the object of intellectual property is a value in socio-philosophical sense that satisfies the social, economic, cultural, mental and other needs and interests of people. In this sense, an object by its nature is a blessing for a person; 3) Social connections between the subjects of intellectual relations are revealed through corresponding rights and obligations of the participants of these relations; in the relations of intellectual property social relations manifest themselves as interaction between people in different spheres of social life, based on the corresponding social statuses and roles, in which individuals carry out creative activity, realize their mental and cultural needs, etc. Understanding the concept "intellectual property" as identical with the concept “intellectual property right” is based on a normative approach. This approach shows that the concepts of “intellectual property” and “intellectual property right” have the same sense in the legislation and can denote both objects of intellectual property right and rights to such objects.


Author(s):  
Irma Rachmawati Maruf

 As an archipelago,  Indonesia consists of 17.507 islands. The regions of Indonesia have some of their indigenous ethnic groups.  However, in the light of the geographical aspect, Indonesia has 128 ethnics groups which have different cultures. Meanwhile, since the end of 1990s, the topic of genetic resources, traditional knowledge and Indigenous heritage ambit of Intellectual property discussions.  Batik and Angklung  are Indonesian Indigenous heritage which have been acknowledged by UNESCO as Intangible Cultural Heritage. One of the purposes of the acknowledgment is  to avoid  any claim from another country which has the same culture. Besides batik and angklung, there are so many indigenous heritages that  have not been acknowledged as Intangible Cultural Heritage. Due to this condition, the research is made to know what the protection should be given by law to Indigenous heritage in international law perspective. There is also how the implementation of International convention to Indonesian law can protect and maintain the cultural heritage.The method used in this study is a juridical normative with the specifications of analytical description. The research was conducted by collecting primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials through library and field research, and then analyzed with qualitative method.Based on the results of this study, it is revealed that: Firstly, the legal basis of the application of the Implementation of Protection of Indonesian Indigenous heritage have been already very relevant but still insufficient in implementation. Hence, it is not impossible that   Indonesian  government can take  economic advantages of Indigenous Heritage.  Secondly, there are various forms  of Legal protection of Indigenous Heritage, these are Law of Intellectual Property Right and Legal Protection besides Intellectual Property.Keyword : Indigenous Heritage, Intangible Cultural Heritage, Intelectual Property Right Law.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Horislavska Inna ◽  
◽  
Piddubnyi Oleksii ◽  

Intellectual property rights are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. A patent for an animal breed is the exclusive right of the inventor to his selection achievement, it is a legal monopoly provided by the state, and patent protection prevents commercial use without the consent of its owner. Today's challenges are directly related to food security. The practical application of breeding achievements in animal husbandry, in particular, is the genetic improvement of animals from the «economic side», which directly affects the level of investment and rewards for breeders, and thus the need for effective legal protection of intellectual property rights. Based on the analysis of normative legal acts regulating the procedure for obtaining legal protection of selection achievements in animal husbandry, the article examines problematic positions and suggests ways to resolve conflicts in the legal regulation of these issues. The methods of our study were chosen taking into account the purpose and objectives of the study. The study used philosophical, general scientific and special legal methods of scientific knowledge. Keywords: object of intellectual property right, selection achievement, selection achievement in animal husbandry, protection of intellectual property right


Author(s):  
Ian J. Lloyd

Database protection in Europe took the form of the EC Directive of 11 March 1996 on The Legal Protection of Databases which was implemented in the United Kingdom by the Copyright and Rights in Databases Regulations 1997. The Database Directive creates a new form of intellectual property right—the database right. This chapter discusses the scope and extent of the Directive.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 67-84
Author(s):  
Tejia GUMILAR

Industrial era requires legal protection of intellectual property. Idea and innovation become valuable inventions that must be protected from unauthorized use by unauthorized persons. For this purpose a reliable description of an invention is very important. Terminology must be specified enough to describe protected product in detail. In the globalized world of industry, properly translated terminology is necessary for translation of patents into another language. In this paper the author presents comparative studies on the technical terminology of a intellectual property right, called protection of the utility model, in German, Polish and Indonesian.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
Mirjana Milosevic ◽  
Charassri Nualsri

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (7) ◽  
pp. 1301-1329
Author(s):  
Ali Raza ◽  
Moreno Muffatto ◽  
Saadat Saeed

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to clarify the relationship between entrepreneurial cognition and innovative entrepreneurial activity (IEA) across countries using an institutional perspective. Design/methodology/approach The paper tests theoretical model using data collected by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, the Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness study and the Index of Economic Freedom (IEF). A multi-level analysis is performed based on set of 1,004,620 observations from 49 countries spanning 13 years (2001–2013). Findings The results suggest that in terms of formal regulations; the relationship between entrepreneurial cognitions and IEA becomes stronger when there is an increase in intellectual property right and business freedom regulations in a country. On the other hand, in terms of informal institutions the relationship between entrepreneurial cognitions and IEA becomes stronger when the level of institutional collectivism and uncertainty decreases and performance orientation increases. Originality/value The study indicates that entrepreneurship by innovation increases when the individuals possess high level of entrepreneurial cognition under suitable institutional conditions (e.g. intellectual property right, business freedom, institutional collectivism, uncertainty avoidance and performance orientation).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document