scholarly journals Clinical characterization of chromosome 5q21.1–21.3 microduplication: A case report

Open Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1123-1127
Author(s):  
Shuang Chen ◽  
Yang Yu ◽  
Han Zhang ◽  
Leilei Li ◽  
Yuting Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Microarray Analysis ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
Chromosome 5 ◽  
Left Lateral Ventricle ◽  
Pulsed Doppler Ultrasound

AbstractChromosomal microdeletions and microduplications likely represent the main genetic etiologies for children with developmental delay or intellectual disability. Through prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis, some microdeletions or microduplications can be detected before birth to avoid unnecessary abortions or birth defects. Although some microdeletions or microduplications of chromosome 5 have been reported, numerous microduplications remain undescribed. We describe herein a case of a 30-year-old woman carrying a fetus with a chromosome 5q21.1–q21.3 microduplication. Because noninvasive prenatal testing indicated a fetal chromosome 5 abnormality, the patient underwent amniocentesis at 22 weeks 4 days of gestation. Karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis were performed on amniotic fluid cells. Fetal behavioral and structural abnormalities were assessed by color and pulsed Doppler ultrasound. Clinical characteristics of the newborn were assessed during the follow-up. The left lateral ventricle appeared widened on ultrasound, but the infant appeared normal at birth. The 5q21.1–q21.3 microduplication in the fetus was inherited from his mother. There are seven genes in this duplication region, but their main functions are unclear. According to this case report, microduplication in this region could represent a benign mutation. Clinicians should pay attention to the breakpoints and the genes involved when counseling patients with microdeletions and microduplications.

scholarly journals Chromosomal Microarray Analysis versus Karyotyping in Fetuses with Increased Nuchal Translucency

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Cicatiello ◽  
Piero Pignataro ◽  
Antonella Izzo ◽  
Nunzia Mollo ◽  
Lucia Pezone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Microarray Analysis ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Normal Karyotype ◽  
Nuchal Translucency ◽  
Cystic Hygroma ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
Chromosomal Anomalies ◽  
Increased Nuchal Translucency

We have carried out a retrospective study of chromosome anomalies associated with increased nuchal translucency (NT) in order to compare yield rates of karyotype, chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), and non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in this condition. Presenting with increased NT or cystic hygroma ≥3.5 mm as an isolated sign, 249 fetuses underwent karyotype and/or CMA from 11 to 18 gestational weeks. Karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses detected 103 chromosomal anomalies including 95 aneuploidies and eight chromosomal rearrangements or derivatives. Further, seven pathogenic copy number variants (CNV), five likely pathogenic CNVs, and 15 variants of unknown significance (VOUS) were detected by CMA in fetuses with normal karyotype. Genetic testing is now facing new challenges due to results with uncertain clinical impacts. Additional investigations will be necessary to interpret these findings. More than 15% of the anomalies that we have diagnosed with invasive techniques could not be detected by NIPT. It is therefore definitely not recommended in the case of ultrasound anomalies. These results, while corroborating the use of CMA in fetuses with increased NT as a second tier after rapid aneuploidy testing, do not suggest a dismissal of karyotype analysis.

scholarly journals A retrospective study of noninvasive prenatal testing for chromosome aneuploidies and subchromosomal copy number variations in 24359 single pregnancies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
yuefang Liu ◽  
Longfei Cheng ◽  
Yuan Peng ◽  
Zhe Liang ◽  
Xin Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis

Abstract Background: With the development of whole-genome sequencing, small subchromosomal deletions and duplications could be found by non-invasive prenatal testing(NIPT). Our study is aimed to review the efficacy of NIPT as a screening test for aneuploidies and subchromosomal copy number variations (CNVs) in 24359 single pregnancies.Methods: A total of 24359 single pregnancies with different clinical features were retrospectively analyzed. Pathogenicity of abnormal NIPT results were assessed according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics(ACMG). Chromosome aneuploidies and subchromosomal CNVs were confirmed by karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis(CMA). Results: A total of 442 pregnancies (442/24359,1.9%) were with abnormal NIPT results. The positive predictive value (PPV) for trisomy 21(T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), and sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) was 84.8%, 54.2%, 11.1% an 40.5% respectively. The PPV for subchromosomal CNVs was 59.0% (46/78). The clinical information, prenatal diagnosis results and follow-up results of 46 true positive cases, 6 cases with subchromosomal CNVs inconsistent with NIPT and 1 case of false negative were also demonstrated in detail.Conclusion: Our data have potential significance in demonstrating the significance of NIPT not only for common whole chromosome aneuploidies but also for subchromosomal CNV. Besides, the clinical information, prenatal diagnosis results and follow-up results of 52 cases with subchromosomal CNV and 1 case of false negative would provide important guidance for genetic counseling.

scholarly journals “Something Extra on Chromosome 5”: Parents’ Understanding of Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) Results

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1116-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Walser ◽  
Allison Werner-Lin ◽  
Amita Russell ◽  
Ronald J. Wapner ◽  
Barbara A. Bernhardt
Keyword(s):  
Microarray Analysis ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
Chromosome 5

scholarly journals A prenatal diagnosis case of partial duplication 21q21.1-q21.2 with normal phenotype maternally inherited

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunyan Jin ◽  
Zhiping Gu ◽  
Xiaohan Jiang ◽  
Pei Yu ◽  
Tianhui Xu
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Pregnant Woman ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Chromosome 21 ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
Serological Screening ◽  
Partial Duplication ◽  
Her Family ◽  
Clinical Consequences

Abstract Background Down syndrome is characterized by trisomy 21 or partial duplication of chromosome 21. Extensive studies have focused on the identification of the Down Syndrome Critical Region (DSCR). We aim to provide evidence that duplication of 21q21.1-q21.2 should not be included in the DSCR and it has no clinical consequences on the phenotype. Case presentation Because serological screening was not performed at the appropriate gestational age, noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) analysis was performed for a pregnant woman with normal prenatal examinations at 22 weeks of gestation. The NIPT results revealed a 5.8 Mb maternally inherited duplication of 21q21.1-q21.2. To assess whether the fetus also carried this duplication, ultrasound-guided amniocentesis was conducted, and the result of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) with amniotic fluid showed a 6.7 Mb duplication of 21q21.1-q21.2 (ranging from position 18,981,715 to 25,707,009). This partial duplication of 21q21.1-q21.2 in the fetus was maternally inherited. After genetic counseling, the pregnant woman and her family decided to continue the pregnancy. Conclusion Our case clearly indicates that 21q21.1-q21.2 duplication is not included in the DSCR and most likely has no clinical consequences on phenotype.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document