Chapter 5—The Development of Bone Graft Materials Using Various Formulations of Demineralized Bone Matrix

2009 ◽  
pp. 96-96-17
Author(s):  
CT Laurencin ◽  
WW Tomford ◽  
M Borden
2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110251
Author(s):  
Vijay Kumar ◽  
Vidya Rattan ◽  
Sachin Rai ◽  
Satinder Pal Singh ◽  
Jai Kumar Mahajan

Objective: Comparison between bovine-derived demineralized bone matrix (DMBM) and iliac crest graft over long term for secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) in terms of radiological and clinical outcomes. Design: Prospective, randomized, parallel groups, double-blind, controlled trial. Setting: Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Health Science Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh. Participants: Twenty patients with UCLP. Interventions: Patients were allocated into group I (Iliac crest bone graft) and group II (DMBM) for SABG. Outcomes were assessed at 2 weeks, 6 months, and then after mean follow-up period of 63 months. Outcomes Measures: Volumetric analysis of the grafted bone in the alveolar cleft site was done through cone beam computed tomography using Cavalieri principle and modified assessment tool. Clinical assessment was performed in terms of pain, swelling, duration of hospital stay, cost of surgery, alar base symmetry, and donor site morbidity associated with iliac crest harvesting. Results: Volumetric analysis through Cavalieri principle revealed comparable bone uptake at follow-up of 6 months between group I (70%) and group II (69%). Modified assessment tool showed no significant difference between horizontal and vertical bone scores over short- and long-term follow-up. In group II, there was higher cost of surgery, but no donor site morbidity unlike group I. Conclusions: Demineralized bone matrix proved analogous to iliac crest bone graft as per volumetric analysis over shorter period. However, although statistically insignificant, net bone volume achieved was lower than the iliac crest graft at longer follow-up.


Spine ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 877-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen D. Cook ◽  
Jeanette E. Dalton ◽  
Ann B. Prewett ◽  
Thomas S. Whitecloud

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferdiansyah Ferdiansyah ◽  
Dwikora Novembri Utomo ◽  
Heri Suroto

Bone defect remains a big challenge for orthopedic surgeon. Bone grafting nowadays become the second common transplantation after blood transfusion. Autogenous bone graft is the gold standard in treatment of bone defect, but it’s source limitation and donor site morbidity makes some surgeon were looking for allograft or xenograft. There are some issues with allo- and xenograft about difficulty in corporation and rejection reaction. This study explores the immunogenicity of allograft and xenograft. Keyword :  freeze-dried xenograft, freeze-dried allograft, hydroxyapatite xenograft, demineralized bone matrix xenograft.


2011 ◽  
Vol 217-218 ◽  
pp. 1006-1013
Author(s):  
Zhi Yu Zhou ◽  
Li Jin Zou ◽  
Hai Sheng Li ◽  
Cody Bunger ◽  
Xue Nong Zou

An ideal bone graft material should have osteocondutive, osteroindurctive, and osteogenic features. Scientists and doctors have been trying to develop this kind of material for over one century. However, all the features of few materials used in clinic now have been qualified. Recently, COLLOSS, as the new generation bone graft material of demineralized bone matrix, almost achieved this height. The paper presents a general survey of COLLOSS including its extraction processes, biological characteristics, and application prospects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document