Abstract
Ensemble sensitivity is often a diagonal approximation to the multivariate regression, leading to a simple univariate regression. Comparatively, the multivariate ensemble sensitivity retains the full covariance matrix when computing the multivariate regression. The performances of both univariate and multivariate ensemble sensitivities in multiscale flows have not been thoroughly examined, and the demonstration of the latter in realistic applications has been sparse. A high-resolution ensemble forecast of Typhoon Haiyan (2013) is used to examine the performances of the two ensemble sensitivities. Compared to the multivariate sensitivity, the univariate sensitivity overestimates the forecast metric, especially at higher levels. To increase the predicted Haiyan’s intensity, multivariate ensemble sensitivity gives initial perturbations characterized by a warming area around the center of the storm, an increased moisture area around the eyewall, a stronger primary circulation around the radius of maximum wind, and stronger inflow at low levels and stronger outflow at high levels. Perturbed initial condition experiments verify that the predicted response from the multivariate sensitivity is more accurate than that from the univariate sensitivity. Therefore, the ability of multivariate sensitivity to provide more accurate predicted responses than the univariate sensitivity has been demonstrated in a realistic multiscale flow application.
Setting the Stage for Cosmic Chronometers. II. Impact of Stellar Population Synthesis Models Systematics and Full Covariance Matrix
