scholarly journals Reward Expectation Modulates Local Field Potentials, Spiking Activity and Spike-Field Coherence in the Primary Motor Cortex

eNeuro ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. ENEURO.0178-19.2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junmo An ◽  
Taruna Yadav ◽  
John P. Hessburg ◽  
Joseph T. Francis
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nargess Heydari Beni ◽  
Reza Foodeh ◽  
Vahid Shalchyan ◽  
Mohammad Reza Daliri

2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 1500-1512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagi Perel ◽  
Patrick T. Sadtler ◽  
Emily R. Oby ◽  
Stephen I. Ryu ◽  
Elizabeth C. Tyler-Kabara ◽  
...  

A diversity of signals can be recorded with extracellular electrodes. It remains unclear whether different signal types convey similar or different information and whether they capture the same or different underlying neural phenomena. Some researchers focus on spiking activity, while others examine local field potentials, and still others posit that these are fundamentally the same signals. We examined the similarities and differences in the information contained in four signal types recorded simultaneously from multielectrode arrays implanted in primary motor cortex: well-isolated action potentials from putative single units, multiunit threshold crossings, and local field potentials (LFPs) at two distinct frequency bands. We quantified the tuning of these signal types to kinematic parameters of reaching movements. We found 1) threshold crossing activity is not a proxy for single-unit activity; 2) when examined on individual electrodes, threshold crossing activity more closely resembles LFP activity at frequencies between 100 and 300 Hz than it does single-unit activity; 3) when examined across multiple electrodes, threshold crossing activity and LFP integrate neural activity at different spatial scales; and 4) LFP power in the “beta band” (between 10 and 40 Hz) is a reliable indicator of movement onset but does not encode kinematic features on an instant-by-instant basis. These results show that the diverse signals recorded from extracellular electrodes provide somewhat distinct and complementary information. It may be that these signal types arise from biological phenomena that are partially distinct. These results also have practical implications for harnessing richer signals to improve brain-machine interface control.


2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (17) ◽  
pp. 7220-7233 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Shimamoto ◽  
E. S. Ryapolova-Webb ◽  
J. L. Ostrem ◽  
N. B. Galifianakis ◽  
K. J. Miller ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abed Khorasani ◽  
Nargess Heydari Beni ◽  
Vahid Shalchyan ◽  
Mohammad Reza Daliri

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 1603-1619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arjun K. Bansal ◽  
Carlos E. Vargas-Irwin ◽  
Wilson Truccolo ◽  
John P. Donoghue

A prominent feature of motor cortex field potentials during movement is a distinctive low-frequency local field potential ( lf-LFP) (<4 Hz), referred to as the movement event-related potential (mEP). The lf-LFP appears to be a global signal related to regional synaptic input, but its relationship to nearby output signaled by single unit spiking activity (SUA) or to movement remains to be established. Previous studies comparing information in primary motor cortex (MI) lf-LFPs and SUA in the context of planar reaching tasks concluded that lf-LFPs have more information than spikes about movement. However, the relative performance of these signals was based on a small number of simultaneously recorded channels and units, or for data averaged across sessions, which could miss information of larger-scale spiking populations. Here, we simultaneously recorded LFPs and SUA from two 96-microelectrode arrays implanted in two major motor cortical areas, MI and ventral premotor (PMv), while monkeys freely reached for and grasped objects swinging in front of them. We compared arm end point and grip aperture kinematics′ decoding accuracy for lf-LFP and SUA ensembles. The results show that lf-LFPs provide enough information to reconstruct kinematics in both areas with little difference in decoding performance between MI and PMv. Individual lf-LFP channels often provided more accurate decoding of single kinematic variables than any one single unit. However, the decoding performance of the best single unit among the large population usually exceeded that of the best single lf-LFP channel. Furthermore, ensembles of SUA outperformed the pool of lf-LFP channels, in disagreement with the previously reported superiority of lf-LFP decoding. Decoding results suggest that information in lf-LFPs recorded from intracortical arrays may allow the reconstruction of reach and grasp for real-time neuroprosthetic applications, thus potentially supplementing the ability to decode these same features from spiking populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document