scholarly journals Soil Washing Technology for Removing Heavy Metals from a Contaminated Soil: A Case Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 1029-1036
Author(s):  
Khalid Alaboudi ◽  
Berhan Ahmed ◽  
Graham Brodie
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zainab Siddiqui ◽  
◽  
S.M Ali Jawaid ◽  
Sandeep Vishen ◽  
Shreya Verma ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kanghee Cho ◽  
Eunji Myung ◽  
Hyunsoo Kim ◽  
Cheonyoung Park ◽  
Nagchoul Choi ◽  
...  

In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using a solution of sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid as an extraction method for soil-washing to remove Cu, Pb, Zn, and As from contaminated soil. We treated various soil particles, including seven fraction sizes, using sulfuric acid. In addition, to improve Cu, Pb, Zn, and As removal efficiencies, washing agents were compared through batch experiments. The results showed that each agent behaved differently when reacting with heavy metals (Cu, Pb, and Zn) and As. Sulfuric acid was more effective in extracting heavy metals than in extracting As. However, phosphoric acid was not effective in extracting heavy metals. Compared with each inorganic acid, As removal from soil by washing agents increased in the order of sulfuric acid (35.81%) < phosphoric acid (62.96%). Therefore, an enhanced mixture solution using sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid to simultaneously remove heavy metals and As from contaminated soils was investigated. Sulfuric acid at 0.6 M was adopted to combine with 0.6 M phosphoric acid to obtain the mixture solution (1:1) that was used to determine the effect for the simultaneous removal of both heavy metals and As from the contaminated soil. The removal efficiencies of As, Cu, Pb, and Zn were 70.5%, 79.6%, 80.1%, and 71.2%, respectively. The combination of sulfuric acid with phosphoric acid increased the overall As and heavy metal extraction efficiencies from the contaminated soil samples. With the combined effect of dissolving oxides and ion exchange under combined washings, the removal efficiencies of heavy metals and As were higher than those of single washings.


Chemosphere ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 290-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Sierra ◽  
D. Martínez-Blanco ◽  
Jesús A. Blanco ◽  
J.R. Gallego

2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 432-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofang Guo ◽  
Zebin Wei ◽  
C. J. Penn ◽  
Tianfen Xu ◽  
Qitang Wu

2019 ◽  
Vol 232 ◽  
pp. 895-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quan Zou ◽  
Honglin Xiang ◽  
Jianguo Jiang ◽  
Dean Li ◽  
Aikelaimu Aihemaiti ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 610-613 ◽  
pp. 2405-2409
Author(s):  
Li Mei Sun ◽  
Jiang Wu ◽  
Shuai Qi Meng

The paper presents that soil washing and bioremediation technologies were employed to treat the contaminated soil. Various works were conduced in parallel with each other and th results of the laboratouy studies were used to determine critical parameters. Four lixiviants, i.e. sulphuric acid, acetic acid, oxalic acid and ethylene diamine acetic acid were tests at three concentration levels respectively. The tests showed that the leaching of the heavy metals increases as the soil porosity increases. Silica sand was added to increase porosity of the contaminated soil. Hightest Mn removal was achieved mainly by sulphuric and oxalic acid at 0.001M at all soil samples. EDTA was significantly efficient in the removal of Ni and Zn. The recovery of heavy metals, particalarly Mn, decreased as the depth of samping increased. Heterogeneous bacteria and filamentous organism plate counts were conduced to evaluate the growth of the bacteria and filamentous organisms in the soil. The results from this study suggest that the leaching of heavy metals from the contaminated soil is to a large extent dependant on the pH of the leaching solution. By increasing the soil’s porosity and bioremediating the soil, higher extractions of metals were achieved.


2010 ◽  
Vol 178 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 578-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weihua Zhang ◽  
Lizhi Tong ◽  
Yuan Yuan ◽  
Zhiyong Liu ◽  
Hao Huang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document