Speak of the Devil Jeffrey S. Victor .Satanic Panic: The Creation of a Contemporary Legend. Chicago and LaSalle, IL, Open Court, 1993.

1994 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-35
Author(s):  
Marilyn Nagy
1994 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Davis ◽  
Jeffrey S. Victor
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. 115-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Whitby

In a recent article which does much to enhance understanding of an important but neglected work, David M. Olster has drawn attention to the historical and political background against which George of Pisidia, panegyrist of the Emperor Heraclius (AD 610–641), composed his major surviving poem, the Hexaemeron. Olster rightly casts doubt on the validity of the distinct categories of ‘panegyrical’ and ‘theological’ into which George's poetry has traditionally been classified, and illuminates the significance of the Creation theme as a metaphor for political renewal at a time when the Byzantines achieved great victories against Persia after a prolonged period of disaster in the first decades of the seventh century. These observations lead him to the view that all of George's poetry should be interpreted in political and panegyrical rather than theological or religious terms.


1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 410
Author(s):  
Anson Shupe ◽  
Jeffrey S. Victor
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Adam Azmi Syahroni

Adam as is the first prophet and man that God created on this earth. Before Adam was created, Allah SWT had hinted to the angels that he would make Adam the Caliph on this earth. That makes the angels ask questions to each other, especially the Devil who is one of the inhabitants of the sky who hears the word of God. The creation of Adam (as) did not make Satan happy, but he hated so much that he was finally expelled by God from heaven and threatened to tempt Adam and his grandchildren. This article contains the values ​​of character education that can be taken in the story of Adam and Satan, both from the very first time Adam was created until he was revealed to the earth, where all of the events of Adam were not escaped from Satan's observation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-62
Author(s):  
N. R. Oinotkinova

The paper analyzes the plots and motives of Altai myths about the creation of the earth and man with the use of comparative material from the folklore of peoples with which the Altai people had close contacts in the past, in particular from Russian and Buryat-Mongolian folklore. The motives characteristic of these versions are considered: diving behind the earth; creation of the earth; the creation of man; the dog protects the human body; desecration of the human body; spilled elixir of immortality; lost heaven; the overthrow of the devil from heaven; competition of deities for primacy in the rule of the world. In the Altai folk tradition, two versions of the myth of the creation of the world and man are distinguished: the first is dualistic (pagan) and the second is “Buddhist”. In the dualistic version of the myth, the main characters are two deities – Ulgen and Erlik. In the plot of the “Buddhist” version of the myth, unlike the dualistic one, 4 deity brothers participate in the act of creation: Yuch-Kurbustan (Three Kurbustan) and Erlik. This story is joined by a Buddhist legend about how bodhisattvas competed in order for the victor to become the ruler of the world.


Author(s):  
S. Langdon

Dualism is a term introduced into modern theology by the Englishman, Thomas Hyde, in 1700, and was first used to describe sthe fundamental principle of Persian Zoroastrism, namely the independent existence of good and evil. Ormazd the good god and Ahriman the evil god in the theology of the Persians represent an absolute dualism. For them Ahriman, corresponding to Satan of Judaism and Christianity, is entirely independent of the creator god. Good and evil, God and the Devil, are primeval supreme powers. Now I wish to trace the history of Satan or the Devil in Christianity back through Judaism, Hebrew, and Babylonian religion to its origin among the Sumerians. I shall endeavour to prove this Persian dualism, which admits that God did not create the Devil, to be totally foreign to Sumerian, Babylonian, and Hebrew speculation; and I shall then briefly examine the evidence on which modern scholars admit dualism to have been held by the Jews of the Apocalyptic period and by early Christianity as set forth in the New Testament. It is my conviction that Persian religion never had any influence upon Judaism or early Christianity. Satan, the Devil (diabolus), is traceable directly to Babylonian theology; there he is the creation of the gods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document