High prevalence of pituitary dysfunction following blast traumatic brain injury: results from the UK Blast Injury Outcome Study of Armed Forces Personnel (BIOSAP)

2013 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Claire Feeney ◽  
David Baxter ◽  
David Sharp ◽  
Debbie Peters ◽  
Timothy Ham ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. bmjmilitary-2020-001655
Author(s):  
J W Denny ◽  
R J Brown ◽  
M G Head ◽  
J Batchelor ◽  
A S Dickinson

IntroductionThere is little systematic tracking or detailed analysis of investments in research and development for blast injury to support decision-making around research future funding.MethodsThis study examined global investments into blast injury-related research from public and philanthropic funders across 2000–2019. Research databases were searched using keywords, and open data were extracted from funder websites. Data collected included study title, abstract, award amount, funder and year. Individual awards were categorised to compare amounts invested into different blast injuries, the scientific approaches taken and analysis of research investment into blast traumatic brain injury (TBI).ResultsA total of 806 awards were identified into blast injury-related research globally, equating to US$902.1 million (m, £565.9m GBP). There was a general increase in year-on-year investment between 2003 and 2009 followed by a consistent decline in annual funding since 2010. Pre-clinical research received $671.3 m (74.4%) of investment. Brain-related injury research received $427.7 m (47.4%), orthopaedic injury $138.6 m (15.4%), eye injury $63.7 m (7.0%) and ear injury $60.5m (6.7%). Blast TBI research received a total investment of $384.3 m, representing 42.6% of all blast injury-related research. The U.S. Department of Defense funded $719.3 m (80%).ConclusionsInvestment data suggest that blast TBI research has received greater funding than other blast injury health areas. The funding pattern observed can be seen as reactive, driven by the response to the War on Terror, the rising profile of blast TBI and congressionally mandated research.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. E47-E56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol A. Hawley ◽  
H. Thomas de Burgh ◽  
Robert J. Russell ◽  
Andrew Mead

Author(s):  
Jiangyue Zhang ◽  
Narayan Yoganandan ◽  
Frank A. Pintar ◽  
Steven F. Son ◽  
Thomas A. Gennarelli

Traumatic brain injury from explosive devices has become the signature wound of the U.S. armed forces in Iraq and Afghanistan [1–4]. However, due to the complicated nature of this specific form of brain injury, little is known about the injury mechanisms. Physical head models have been used in blunt and penetrating head trauma studies to obtain biomechanical data and correlate to mechanisms of injury [5–8]. The current study is designed to investigate intracranial head/brain injury biomechanics under blast loading using a physical head model.


2013 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 527-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Baxter ◽  
David J. Sharp ◽  
Claire Feeney ◽  
Debbie Papadopoulou ◽  
Timothy E. Ham ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 112 (08) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Schneider ◽  
HJ Schneider ◽  
F von Rosen ◽  
B Husemann ◽  
B Saller ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halle Quang ◽  
Skye McDonald ◽  
Phuong Huynh-Le ◽  
Tuong-Vu Nguyen ◽  
Ngoc-Anh Le ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Martin ◽  
Lara Zimmermann ◽  
Kee D. Kim ◽  
Marike Zwienenberg ◽  
Kiarash Shahlaie

Traumatic brain injury remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Patients with severe traumatic brain injury are best treated with a multidisciplinary, evidence-based, protocol-directed approach, which has been shown to decrease mortality and improve functional outcomes. Therapy is directed at the prevention of secondary brain injury through optimizing cerebral blood flow and the delivery of metabolic fuel (ie, oxygen and glucose). This is accomplished through the measurement and treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), the strict avoidance of hypotension and hypoxemia, and in some instances, surgical management. The treatment of elevated ICP is approached in a protocolized, tiered manner, with escalation of care occurring in the setting of refractory intracranial hypertension, culminating in either decompressive surgery or barbiturate coma. With such an approach, the rates of mortality secondary to traumatic brain injury are declining despite an increasing incidence of traumatic brain injury. This review contains 3 figures, 5 tables and 69 reference Key Words: blast traumatic brain injury, brain oxygenation, cerebral perfusion pressure, decompressive craniectomy, hyperosmolar therapy, intracranial pressure, neurocritical care, penetrating traumatic brain injury, severe traumatic brain injury


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document