Evaluate the effectiveness of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology in the prediction of thyroid cancer (TBSRTC) on fine needle aspiration (FNA) in Moscow region, Russia

Author(s):  
Timur Britvin ◽  
Olga Nechaeva ◽  
Alexey Krivosheev ◽  
Larisa Bavykina ◽  
Armine Kazaryan ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ahmed K. Aly ◽  
Mahmoud A. Ali ◽  
Apoorva Sharma ◽  
Michael A. Gubbels ◽  
Xing Zhao ◽  
...  

Introduction: Thyroid nodules are very common. Many are detected incidentally due to increased head and neck imaging. The majority are benign; however, malignancy can’t be excluded in many cases and tissue sampling is needed. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration is an easy and effective way to sample g thyroid nodules. Inadequate sampling was reported in 10-40% of the cases. Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) was proposed to assess obtained sample for adequacy. The aim of this study is to identify the benefit of applying ROSE with US-FNA of thyroid nodules within our institution. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent FNA for thyroid nodules with ROSE availability documented in their procedure note between January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively included. All procedures were done by experienced radiologists. Aspirated material was Diff Quik stained for immediate evaluation. The final cytological diagnosis and specimen adequacy was based on The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Specimen adequacy was compared between ROSE and non-ROSE groups. Results: 442 thyroid nodules were biopsied. ROSE was available for 65 nodules. Non-diagnostic rate with ROSE was 10.8% compared to 13.8% without ROSE with the difference being statistically insignificant. ROSE availability improved sample adequacy of nodules less than 3 cm with statistically significant difference of 100.0% with ROSE vs. 87% without ROSE. Conclusion: The current study does not justify the routine use of ROSE. However, ROSE availability is beneficial with smaller sized thyroid nodules and less experienced radiologists performing the procedure. Doi: 10.28991/SciMedJ-2021-0301-1 Full Text: PDF


2017 ◽  
Vol 141 (5) ◽  
pp. 684-689
Author(s):  
Qin Ye ◽  
Jennifer S. Woo ◽  
Qunzi Zhao ◽  
Ping Wang ◽  
Pintong Huang ◽  
...  

Context.— The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology recommends against the use of intraoperative frozen section (FS) during lobectomy of a thyroid nodule with a fine-needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosis of malignant. Bethesda recommendations for FS in the FNA category of suspicious for malignancy (SFM) is less well-defined. In some institutions in China, FS examination is performed during lobectomy even for FNA-proven malignant cases. Objective.— —To compare the efficacy of FNA versus FS in the evaluation of malignant thyroid lesions. Design.— A 3-year retrospective analysis from a single institution was performed on cases with an FNA diagnosis of SFM or malignant with subsequent FS examination during thyroidectomy. The results of FNA and FS findings were compared to the final thyroidectomy pathology. Results.— —A total of 5832 thyroidectomy procedures were performed: 1265 cases had FNA and FS results available. Fine-needle aspiration gave a diagnosis of SFM to 306 cases and a diagnosis of malignant to 821 cases. Of the SFM cases, 10.5% (32 of 306) had benign/indeterminate, 4.6% (14 of 306) suspicious, and 84.9% (260 of 306) malignant FS results. Final pathology showed 56.3% (18 of 32), 64.3% (9 of 14), and 100% (260 of 260) malignancy rates, respectively. For the malignant FNA group, 10.0% (82 of 821) had benign/indeterminate, 4.4% (36 of 821) suspicious, and 85.6% (703 of 821) malignant FS results. The final pathology showed 96.4% (79 of 82), 97.2% (35 of 36), and 99.9% (702 of 703) malignancy rates, respectively. Conclusions.— Frozen section should not be performed for the malignant FNA category because FS evaluation may result in 10% falsely negative findings. Performing FS for SFM may be better justified; however, more than half of FS cases read as benign in this category had malignant final pathology. Therefore, caution should be taken for FS results even in the SFM group.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aili Guo ◽  
Yuuki Kaminoh ◽  
Terra Forward ◽  
Frank L. Schwartz ◽  
Scott Jenkinson

Background. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) remains the first-line diagnostic in management of thyroid nodules and reduces unnecessary surgeries. However, it is still challenging since cytological results are not always straightforward. This study aimed to examine the results of thyroid FNA using the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC) to establish the level of accuracy of FNA procedures in a rural practice setting. Method. A retrospective chart review was conducted on existing thyroid FNA performed in a referral endocrine center between December 2011 and November 2015. Results. A total of 159 patients (18–88 years old) and 236 nodule aspirations were performed and submitted for evaluation. 79% were benign, 3% atypia/follicular lesion of unknown significance (AUS/FLUS), 5% follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN), 4% suspicious for malignancy (one case was indeed an atypical parathyroid neoplasm by surgical pathology), 2% malignant, and 7% nondiagnostic. Two cases also had advanced molecular analysis on FNA specimens before thyroidectomy. Conclusion. The diagnostic yield of FNA cytology from our practice in a rural setting suggests that accuracy and specificity are comparable to results from larger centers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document