Prevalence of non-carcinoid syndrome (non-CS) diarrhoea in patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs): a systematic literature review (SLR)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohid S Khan ◽  
Thomas Walter ◽  
Amy Buchanan-Hughes ◽  
Lucie Keeber ◽  
Marion Feuilly ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina Clair Cockburn ◽  
Zaher Toumi ◽  
Alison Mackie ◽  
Peter Julyan

Abstract Background:Radioguided surgery (RGS) for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) has been suggested as a way to improve intraoperative lesion detection. This systematic literature review of reports of the use of RGS for GEP-NETs was performed to determine if there is a benefit.Methods: A literature search was conducted using Google Scholar and PubMed, and snowballing from any relevant literature. Full-text studies were included if they were published in the English Language and reported outcomes of RGS on human subjects with GEP-NETs. Qualitative data synthesis was performed. Results: 26 papers including a total of 209 patients were included. The tracers used were predominantly indium-111 pentetreotide, gallium-68 DOTA-Peptides, and technetium-99m EDDA/HYNIC-Peptides. Heterogeneous protocols make comparisons difficult, but most papers reported a benefit from the use of RGS in tumours in the gastrointestinal tract; utility in localisation of pancreatic tumours was less clear. Time between tracer administration and operation varied; from 16 hours to 8 days with indium-111, 0-24 hours with technetium-99m and 19-193 minutes with gallium-68. Eight teams reported the thresholding technique used for discrimination – four used a ratio, four statistical methods, and one looked at the sensitivity and specificity of different cut-offs. Six teams performed follow-up of 24 patients (three pancreas, eight gastrinoma, 13 gastrointestinal tract) for between 3 months and 3 years. Two patients relapsed (one pancreas, one gastrinoma) between six and 12 months post-surgery. Conclusions:RGS appears to aid in localisation of gastrointestinal NETs, but the benefit is more equivocal in pancreatic NETs. Further work into outcomes is warranted.


Author(s):  
Katrina Clair Cockburn ◽  
Zaher Toumi ◽  
Alison Mackie ◽  
Peter Julyan

Abstract Background Radioguided surgery (RGS) for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) has been suggested as a way to improve intraoperative lesion detection. This systematic literature review of reports of the use of RGS for GEP-NETs was performed to determine if there is a benefit. Methods A literature search was conducted using Google Scholar and PubMed, and snowballing from any relevant literature. Full-text studies were included if they were published in the English language and reported outcomes of RGS on human subjects with GEP-NETs. Qualitative data synthesis was performed. Results Twenty-six papers including a total of 209 patients were included. The tracers used were predominantly indium-111 pentetreotide, gallium-68 DOTA-peptides, and technetium-99m EDDA/HYNIC-peptides. Heterogeneous protocols make comparisons difficult, but most papers reported a benefit from the use of RGS in tumours in the gastrointestinal tract; utility in localisation of pancreatic tumours was less clear. Time between tracer administration and operation varied: from 16 h to 8 days with indium-111, 0–24 h with technetium-99m, and 19–193 min with gallium-68. Eight teams reported the thresholding technique used for discrimination—four used a ratio, four statistical methods, and one looked at the sensitivity and specificity of different cut-offs. Six teams performed follow-up of 24 patients (three pancreas, eight gastrinoma, 13 gastrointestinal tract) for between 3 months and 3 years. Two patients relapsed (one pancreas, one gastrinoma) between 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Conclusions RGS appears to aid in localisation of gastrointestinal NETs, but the benefit is more equivocal in pancreatic NETs. Further work into outcomes is warranted.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather T. Snyder ◽  
Maggie R. Boyle ◽  
Lacey Gosnell ◽  
Julia A. Hammond ◽  
Haley Huey

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 600-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Beel ◽  
Carla Jeffries ◽  
Charlotte Brownlow ◽  
Sonya Winterbotham ◽  
Jan du Preez

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Bumgarner ◽  
Elizabeth J. Polinsky ◽  
Katharine G. Herman ◽  
Joanne M. Fordiani ◽  
Carmen P. Lewis ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine E. Gould ◽  
Brian C. Kok ◽  
Vanessa K. Ma ◽  
Aimee Marie L. Zapata ◽  
Jason E. Owen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document